Literature DB >> 19916204

Minimally invasive haemodynamic monitoring.

Christoph K Hofer1, Maurizio Cecconi, Gernot Marx, Giorgio della Rocca.   

Abstract

Different minimally invasive haemodynamic monitoring techniques are commercially available today and in the recent years they have proved adequate in replacing the pulmonary artery catheter under certain clinical conditions.Moreover, several of these techniques provide additional new parameters primarily related to preload assessment.Therefore, in order to be used in daily clinical practice, the diversity of minimally invasive haemodynamic monitoring requires knowledge of the different techniques, the different parameters provided by the devices and their clinical validity. The aim of the present article is to review the most widely used minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring techniques; emphasize the new parameters available for preload assessment;and propose a modular stepwise monitoring concept.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19916204     DOI: 10.1097/eja.0b013e3283300d55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  12 in total

1.  Continuous cardiac output measurement by un-calibrated pulse wave analysis and pulmonary artery catheter in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michael T Ganter; Jamal A Alhashemi; Adel M Al-Shabasy; Ursina M Schmid; Peter Schott; Sanaa A Shalabi; Ahmed M Badri; Sonja Hartnack; Christoph K Hofer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring.

Authors:  Yatin Mehta; Dheeraj Arora
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-26

Review 3.  [Cardiogenic shock].

Authors:  S Rasche; C Georgi
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Early hemodynamic assessment and treatment of elderly patients in the medical ICU.

Authors:  Gorazd Voga; Lucija Gabršček-Parežnik
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Pulse pressure analysis: to make a long story short.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  [Cardiogenic shock].

Authors:  S Rasche; C Georgi
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Cardiac output assessed by invasive and minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Allison J Lee; Jennifer Hochman Cohn; J Sudharma Ranasinghe
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-07-06

8.  Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy-what is the evidence in surgical patients? The effect on different risk groups.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Carlos Corredor; Nishkantha Arulkumaran; Gihan Abuella; Jonathan Ball; R Michael Grounds; Mark Hamilton; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Jaap Jan Vos; Marieke Poterman; Pieternel Papineau Salm; Kai Van Amsterdam; Michel M R F Struys; Thomas W L Scheeren; Alain F Kalmar
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 10.  Clinical review: Does it matter which hemodynamic monitoring system is used?

Authors:  Davinder Ramsingh; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.