Literature DB >> 19916102

Anthrax letters: personal exposure, building contamination, and effectiveness of immediate mitigation measures.

Bill Kournikakis1, Jim Ho, Scott Duncan.   

Abstract

This report is the first detailed and quantitative study of potential mitigation procedures intended to deal with anthrax letters using a simulated anthrax letter release within an actual office building. Spore aerosols were created by opening letters containing 0.1 g of dry powdered Bacillus atrophaeus spores. Culturable aerosol samples were collected using slit-to-agar and filter-based samplers. Five test scenarios were designed to determine whether simple mitigation procedures or activities carried out by the person who opened the letter made a significant difference to aerosol concentrations in comparison to a control scenario where no activity took place. Surface contamination of the letter opener was measured at 10 body points for Scenarios 1 to 4. A sixth scenario, based on published Centers for Disease Control and Prevention anthrax letter response guidelines, used letters containing 1 g of spores. Results demonstrated that the spore aerosol spread throughout the building in less than 4.5 min. Potential mitigation techniques such as closing the office door or shutting off the ventilation system were not effective. Activities carried out by the letter opener including moving, walking to another location, and spraying water onto the contaminated desk with a hand sprayer all resulted in significantly higher aerosol concentrations in comparison to control. The potential total inhalational hazard for the letter opener during the five test scenarios ranged from 4.1 x 10(5) to 1.6 x 10(6) colony forming units (CFU) compared to 3.9 x 10(5) CFU for the control. Surface contamination of the letter opener (Scenarios 1 to 4) was highest on the right hip (4.8 x 10(4) to 1.0 x 10(5) CFU/cm(- 2)) and lowest on the right or left side of the head (2.2 x 10(2) to 3.7 x 10(3) CFU/cm(-2)). The statistically based methodology used in this study provided the means to objectively assess anthrax letter protocols to determine their effectiveness under realistic conditions. Potential mitigation procedures tested in this study did not reduce aerosol hazard or surface contamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19916102     DOI: 10.1080/15459620903389558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  7 in total

1.  Pediatric anthrax clinical management.

Authors:  John S Bradley; Georgina Peacock; Steven E Krug; William A Bower; Amanda C Cohn; Dana Meaney-Delman; Andrew T Pavia
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Detection and tracking of a novel genetically tagged biological simulant in the environment.

Authors:  Peter A Emanuel; Patricia E Buckley; Tiffany A Sutton; Jason M Edmonds; Andrew M Bailey; Bryan A Rivers; Michael H Kim; William J Ginley; Christopher C Keiser; Robert W Doherty; F Joseph Kragl; Fiona E Narayanan; Sarah E Katoski; Sari Paikoff; Samuel P Leppert; John B Strawbridge; Daniel R VanReenen; Sally S Biberos; Douglas Moore; Douglas W Phillips; Lisa R Mingioni; Ogba Melles; Daniel G Ondercin; Beth Hirsh; Kendall M Bieschke; Crystal L Harris; Kristin M Omberg; Vipin K Rastogi; Sheila Van Cuyk; Henry S Gibbons
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Public health emergency planning for children in chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) disasters.

Authors:  Michael T Bartenfeld; Georgina Peacock; Stephanie E Griese
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2014-07-11

4.  Genomic signatures of strain selection and enhancement in Bacillus atrophaeus var. globigii, a historical biowarfare simulant.

Authors:  Henry S Gibbons; Stacey M Broomall; Lauren A McNew; Hajnalka Daligault; Carol Chapman; David Bruce; Mark Karavis; Michael Krepps; Paul A McGregor; Charles Hong; Kyong H Park; Arya Akmal; Andrew Feldman; Jeffrey S Lin; Wenling E Chang; Brandon W Higgs; Plamen Demirev; John Lindquist; Alvin Liem; Ed Fochler; Timothy D Read; Roxanne Tapia; Shannon Johnson; Kimberly A Bishop-Lilly; Chris Detter; Cliff Han; Shanmuga Sozhamannan; C Nicole Rosenzweig; Evan W Skowronski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Surrogate strains of human pathogens for field release.

Authors:  Sangjin Park; Chang-Hwan Kim; Seong Tae Jeong; Sang Yup Lee
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 6.  Possible use of bacteriophages active against Bacillus anthracis and other B. cereus group members in the face of a bioterrorism threat.

Authors:  Ewa Jończyk-Matysiak; Marlena Kłak; Beata Weber-Dąbrowska; Jan Borysowski; Andrzej Górski
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Evaluation of a microfluidic chip system for preparation of bacterial DNA from swabs, air, and surface water samples.

Authors:  Sandra Julich; Helmut Hotzel; Claudia Gärtner; Daniel Trouchet; Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly Ahmed; Nicole Kemper; Herbert Tomaso
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.856

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.