Literature DB >> 19916002

Prediction of hybrid performance in maize using molecular markers and joint analyses of hybrids and parental inbreds.

Tobias A Schrag1, Jens Möhring, Albrecht E Melchinger, Barbara Kusterer, Baldev S Dhillon, Hans-Peter Piepho, Matthias Frisch.   

Abstract

The identification of superior hybrids is important for the success of a hybrid breeding program. However, field evaluation of all possible crosses among inbred lines requires extremely large resources. Therefore, efforts have been made to predict hybrid performance (HP) by using field data of related genotypes and molecular markers. In the present study, the main objective was to assess the usefulness of pedigree information in combination with the covariance between general combining ability (GCA) and per se performance of parental lines for HP prediction. In addition, we compared the prediction efficiency of AFLP and SSR marker data, estimated marker effects separately for reciprocal allelic configurations (among heterotic groups) of heterozygous marker loci in hybrids, and imputed missing AFLP marker data for marker-based HP prediction. Unbalanced field data of 400 maize dent x flint hybrids from 9 factorials and of 79 inbred parents were subjected to joint analyses with mixed linear models. The inbreds were genotyped with 910 AFLP and 256 SSR markers. Efficiency of prediction (R (2)) was estimated by cross-validation for hybrids having no or one parent evaluated in testcrosses. Best linear unbiased prediction of GCA and specific combining ability resulted in the highest efficiencies for HP prediction for both traits (R (2) = 0.6-0.9), if pedigree and line per se data were used. However, without such data, HP for grain yield was more efficiently predicted using molecular markers. The additional modifications of the marker-based approaches had no clear effect. Our study showed the high potential of joint analyses of hybrids and parental inbred lines for the prediction of performance of untested hybrids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19916002     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-009-1208-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  15 in total

1.  Chromosomal regions involved in hybrid performance and heterosis: their AFLP(R)-based identification and practical use in prediction models.

Authors:  M Vuylsteke; M Kuiper; P Stam
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Molecular marker-based prediction of hybrid performance in maize using unbalanced data from multiple experiments with factorial crosses.

Authors:  Tobias A Schrag; Jens Möhring; Hans Peter Maurer; Baldev S Dhillon; Albrecht E Melchinger; Hans-Peter Piepho; Anker P Sørensen; Matthias Frisch
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  The effect of population structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci.

Authors:  A Charcosset; L Essioux
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity.

Authors:  R Bernardo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Prediction of maize single-cross hybrid performance: support vector machine regression versus best linear prediction.

Authors:  Steven Maenhout; Bernard De Baets; Geert Haesaert
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  P Vos; R Hogers; M Bleeker; M Reijans; T van de Lee; M Hornes; A Frijters; J Pot; J Peleman; M Kuiper
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Linkage disequilibrium in European elite maize germplasm investigated with SSRs.

Authors:  Benjamin Stich; Albrecht E Melchinger; Matthias Frisch; Hans P Maurer; Martin Heckenberger; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations.

Authors:  C O Gardner; A S Eberhart
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Maize introduction into Europe: the history reviewed in the light of molecular data.

Authors:  C Rebourg; M Chastanet; B Gouesnard; C Welcker; P Dubreuil; A Charcosset
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-11-27       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  In silico mapping of quantitative trait loci in maize.

Authors:  B Parisseaux; R Bernardo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  33 in total

1.  Identification of combining ability loci for five yield-related traits in maize using a set of testcrosses with introgression lines.

Authors:  Huanhuan Qi; Juan Huang; Qi Zheng; Yaqun Huang; Renxue Shao; Liying Zhu; Zuxin Zhang; Fazhan Qiu; Guangcheng Zhou; Yonglian Zheng; Bing Yue
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genome properties and prospects of genomic prediction of hybrid performance in a breeding program of maize.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Tobias A Schrag; Wolfgang Schipprack; Eva Bauer; Henner Simianer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Transcriptome-based distance measures for grouping of germplasm and prediction of hybrid performance in maize.

Authors:  Matthias Frisch; Alexander Thiemann; Junjie Fu; Tobias A Schrag; Stefan Scholten; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Prediction of maize single-cross hybrid performance: support vector machine regression versus best linear prediction.

Authors:  Steven Maenhout; Bernard De Baets; Geert Haesaert
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Best linear unbiased prediction and optimum allocation of test resources in maize breeding with doubled haploids.

Authors:  Xuefei Mi; Thilo Wegenast; H Friedrich Utz; Baldev S Dhillon; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Beyond Genomic Prediction: Combining Different Types of omics Data Can Improve Prediction of Hybrid Performance in Maize.

Authors:  Tobias A Schrag; Matthias Westhues; Wolfgang Schipprack; Felix Seifert; Alexander Thiemann; Stefan Scholten; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Correlation between parental transcriptome and field data for the characterization of heterosis in Zea mays L.

Authors:  Alexander Thiemann; Junjie Fu; Tobias A Schrag; Albrecht E Melchinger; Matthias Frisch; Stefan Scholten
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Broadening the genetic base of European maize heterotic pools with US Cornbelt germplasm using field and molecular marker data.

Authors:  Jochen C Reif; Sandra Fischer; Tobias A Schrag; Kendall R Lamkey; Dietrich Klein; Baldev S Dhillon; H Friedrich Utz; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Prediction of hybrid biomass in Arabidopsis thaliana by selected parental SNP and metabolic markers.

Authors:  Matthias Steinfath; Tanja Gärtner; Jan Lisec; Rhonda C Meyer; Thomas Altmann; Lothar Willmitzer; Joachim Selbig
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Genetic diversity analysis of elite European maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines using AFLP, SSR, and SNP markers reveals ascertainment bias for a subset of SNPs.

Authors:  Elisabetta Frascaroli; Tobias A Schrag; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.