OBJECTIVES: To compare two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) measurements of ablation zones (AZs) related to the shaft of two different large-volume monopolar multi-tined expandable electrodes. METHODS: Percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation was performed in 12 pigs (81.6 +/- 7.8 kg) using two electrodes (LeVeen 5 cm, Rita XL 5 cm; n = 6 in each group). Contrast-enhanced CT with the electrode shaft in place evaluated the AZ. The largest sphere centred on the electrode shaft within the AZ was calculated (1) based on the 2D axial CT image in the plane of the shaft assuming rotational symmetry of the AZ and (2) using prototype software and the 3D volume data of the AZ measured with CT. RESULTS: The mean largest diameter of a sphere centred on the electrode shaft was always smaller using the 3D data of the AZ than using 2D CT measurements assuming rotational symmetry of the AZ (3D vs 2D): LeVeen 18.2 +/- 4.8 mm; 24.5 +/- 3.1 mm; p = 0.001; Rita XL 20.0 +/- 3.7 mm; 28.8 +/- 4.9 mm; p = 0.0002. All AZ showed indentations around the tines. CONCLUSIONS: Two-dimensional CT measurements assuming rotational symmetry of the AZ overestimate the largest ablated sphere centred on the electrode shaft compared with 3D CT measurements.
OBJECTIVES: To compare two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) measurements of ablation zones (AZs) related to the shaft of two different large-volume monopolar multi-tined expandable electrodes. METHODS: Percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation was performed in 12 pigs (81.6 +/- 7.8 kg) using two electrodes (LeVeen 5 cm, Rita XL 5 cm; n = 6 in each group). Contrast-enhanced CT with the electrode shaft in place evaluated the AZ. The largest sphere centred on the electrode shaft within the AZ was calculated (1) based on the 2D axial CT image in the plane of the shaft assuming rotational symmetry of the AZ and (2) using prototype software and the 3D volume data of the AZ measured with CT. RESULTS: The mean largest diameter of a sphere centred on the electrode shaft was always smaller using the 3D data of the AZ than using 2D CT measurements assuming rotational symmetry of the AZ (3D vs 2D): LeVeen 18.2 +/- 4.8 mm; 24.5 +/- 3.1 mm; p = 0.001; Rita XL 20.0 +/- 3.7 mm; 28.8 +/- 4.9 mm; p = 0.0002. All AZ showed indentations around the tines. CONCLUSIONS: Two-dimensional CT measurements assuming rotational symmetry of the AZ overestimate the largest ablated sphere centred on the electrode shaft compared with 3D CT measurements.
Authors: David S K Lu; Steven S Raman; Darko J Vodopich; Michael Wang; James Sayre; Charles Lassman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Christopher Bangard; Axel Gossmann; Hans U Kasper; Martin Hellmich; Jürgen H Fischer; Arnulf Hölscher; Klaus Lackner; Dirk L Stippel Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2006-05-04 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Dirk L Stippel; Christopher Bangard; Klaus Prenzel; Selim Yavuzyasar; Jürgen H Fischer; Arnulf H Hölscher Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Stefaan Mulier; Yicheng Ni; Lars Frich; Fernando Burdio; Alban L Denys; Jean-François De Wispelaere; Benoît Dupas; Nagy Habib; Michael Hoey; Maarten C Jansen; Marc Lacrosse; Raymond Leveillee; Yi Miao; Peter Mulier; Didier Mutter; Kelvin K Ng; Roberto Santambrogio; Dirk Stippel; Katsuyoshi Tamaki; Thomas M van Gulik; Guy Marchal; Luc Michel Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-01-24 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jeong Min Lee; Joon Koo Han; Jae Young Lee; Se Hyung Kim; Jin Young Choi; Min Woo Lee; Seung Hong Choi; Hong Eo; Byung Ihn Choi Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2006 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 3.500