BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of hematopoietic progenitor cells using liquid nitrogen and controlled-rate freezing requires complex equipment and highly trained staff and is expensive. We compared the liquid nitrogen method with methods using a combination of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) for cryopreservation followed by storage in mechanical freezers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were collected from normal donors by apheresis and allocated to one of four preservation and storage conditions: 1) 10% DMSO with freezing in liquid nitrogen and storage in liquid nitrogen, 2) 5% DMSO and 6% HES with freezing and storage in a -80 degrees C mechanical freezer, 3) 5% DMSO and 6% HES with freezing in a -80 degrees C mechanical freezer and storage in a -135 degrees C mechanical freezer, or 4) 5% DMSO and 6% HES with freezing and storage both in a 135 degrees C mechanical freezer. Cells were stored for 5 years during which total nucleated cells (TNCs), cell viability, CD34+ cell content, and colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage content were determined. RESULTS: There were some significant differences in the variables measured during freezing and the 5 years of storage compared to the values before freezing and storage; however, these differences were not consistent and do not favor one protocol over the others. Samples stored for 24 hours before cryopreservation showed a significant decrease in TNCs, but no other significant changes during the 5 years. CONCLUSION: In vitro measurements indicate that PBSCs can be successfully frozen and stored using a combination of DMSO and HES providing smaller amounts of DMSO and allowing simplified freezing and storage conditions.
BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of hematopoietic progenitor cells using liquid nitrogen and controlled-rate freezing requires complex equipment and highly trained staff and is expensive. We compared the liquid nitrogen method with methods using a combination of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) for cryopreservation followed by storage in mechanical freezers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were collected from normal donors by apheresis and allocated to one of four preservation and storage conditions: 1) 10% DMSO with freezing in liquid nitrogen and storage in liquid nitrogen, 2) 5% DMSO and 6% HES with freezing and storage in a -80 degrees C mechanical freezer, 3) 5% DMSO and 6% HES with freezing in a -80 degrees C mechanical freezer and storage in a -135 degrees C mechanical freezer, or 4) 5% DMSO and 6% HES with freezing and storage both in a 135 degrees C mechanical freezer. Cells were stored for 5 years during which total nucleated cells (TNCs), cell viability, CD34+ cell content, and colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage content were determined. RESULTS: There were some significant differences in the variables measured during freezing and the 5 years of storage compared to the values before freezing and storage; however, these differences were not consistent and do not favor one protocol over the others. Samples stored for 24 hours before cryopreservation showed a significant decrease in TNCs, but no other significant changes during the 5 years. CONCLUSION: In vitro measurements indicate that PBSCs can be successfully frozen and stored using a combination of DMSO and HES providing smaller amounts of DMSO and allowing simplified freezing and storage conditions.
Authors: T Shima; H Iwasaki; T Yamauchi; M Kadowaki; M Kiyosuke; T Mochimaru; K Takenaka; T Miyamoto; K Akashi; T Teshima Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Rebekah S Rasooly; Daniel R Gossett; Marianne K Henderson; Allison Hubel; Stephen N Thibodeau Journal: Biopreserv Biobank Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Virginia Fisher; Hanh Khuu; Virginia David-Ocampo; Karen Byrne; Steven Pavletic; Michael Bishop; Daniel H Fowler; A John Barrett; David F Stroncek Journal: Transfusion Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: G Detry; L Calvet; N Straetmans; A Cabrespine; C Ravoet; J O Bay; H Petre; C Paillard; B Husson; E Merlin; L Boon-Falleur; O Tournilhac; A Delannoy; P Halle Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: T Leemhuis; D Padley; C Keever-Taylor; D Niederwieser; T Teshima; F Lanza; C Chabannon; P Szabolcs; A Bazarbachi; M B C Koh Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: John Underwood; Mahvish Rahim; Carijo West; Rebecca Britton; Elaine Skipworth; Vicki Graves; Steven Sexton; Hillary Harris; Dave Schwering; Anthony Sinn; Karen E Pollok; Kent A Robertson; W Scott Goebel; Kerry M Hege Journal: World J Stem Cells Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 5.326