Literature DB >> 1991257

Expectant management of localized prostatic cancer.

W F Whitmore1, J A Warner, I M Thompson.   

Abstract

Seventy-five patients with clinical Stage B histologically proven prostatic cancer accumulated over a 40-year period and receiving no therapy for at least 1 year after histologic diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-nine patients had Stage B1 lesions, 37 had B2, and nine had B3 lesions; median follow-up for these patients was 124, 120, and 96 months, respectively. Five ultimately received pelvic lymph node dissection with iodine-125 implantation, 23 had transurethral resection of the prostate, and 18 had endocrine therapy. Of those tumors which progressed, 18 of 19 (95%) B1, 26 of 29 (90%) B2, and four of four (100%) B3 lesions demonstrated local progression first. Six of 29 (21%) B1, 17 of 37 (46%) B2, and two of nine (22%) B3 tumors developed recognized distant metastasis. Actuarial survival at 15 years was 67%, 39%, and 63% for patients with B1, B2, and B3 lesions, respectively. These data indicate the varied and potentially protracted course of patients with clinical Stage B prostatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1991257     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910215)67:4<1091::aid-cncr2820670437>3.0.co;2-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  13 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: what are the results and how safe is it?

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Prostate cancer, screening, and prostate-specific antigen: promise or peril?

Authors:  J D Voss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Localised carcinoma of the prostate: a paradigm of uncertainty.

Authors:  S S Sandhu; A V Kaisary
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 2. Ten potential pitfalls in determining the clinical significance of benefits.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Attitude of African-Americans regarding prostate cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  S B Robinson; M Ashley; M A Haynes
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1996-04

6.  An audit of the investigation and treatment of localised prostatic cancer in the south west region.

Authors:  R N Lodge
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Expectant management as an option for men with stage T1c prostate cancer: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J L Mohler; B T Williams; J A Freeman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: trials and tribulations.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Radical prostatectomy: lower rates among African-American men.

Authors:  P J Imperato; R P Nenner; T O Will
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  Precision Medicine in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Development of the Canary-Early Detection Research Network Active Surveillance Biopsy Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Donna P Ankerst; Jing Xia; Ian M Thompson; Josef Hoefler; Lisa F Newcomb; James D Brooks; Peter R Carroll; William J Ellis; Martin E Gleave; Raymond S Lance; Peter S Nelson; Andrew A Wagner; John T Wei; Ruth Etzioni; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.