Literature DB >> 19912305

Attitude towards genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a comparison of affected and unaffected women.

M Bruno1, M Digennaro, S Tommasi, B Stea, T Danese, F Schittulli, A Paradiso.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate women's awareness and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk, to identify socio-demographic factors, to analyse the reasons for wanting or not wanting to be tested and finally to determine whether breast cancer patients and healthy women have different attitudes towards genetic testing. Consecutive series of 879 women without and with breast cancer participated in a 20-item self-completing questionnaire. Among breast cancer patients, 57% answered that they would definitely or probably accept being tested, compared with 84% of women without breast cancer. At the multiple logistic regression analysis only to have a diagnosis of breast cancer conditioned significantly the interest to have genetic testing. Surprisingly, a family history of breast cancer was found to have no significant impact. The most frequently cited reason for being interested in genetic testing was 'to learn about your children's risk'. Although women's awareness about breast cancer genes is inadequate, the interest in genetic testing is substantial and higher both in healthy women and in women with breast cancer. These results provide important indications for the development of educational strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19912305     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01067.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  8 in total

1.  Adherence patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for referral to cancer genetic professionals.

Authors:  Terri Febbraro; Katina Robison; Jennifer Scalia Wilbur; Jessica Laprise; Amy Bregar; Vrishali Lopes; Robert Legare; Ashley Stuckey
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  High acceptance of an early dyslexia screening test involving genetic analyses in Germany.

Authors:  Arndt Wilcke; Bent Müller; Gesa Schaadt; Holger Kirsten; Johannes Boltze
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Breast Cancer Genetics Knowledge and Testing Intentions among Nigerian Professional Women.

Authors:  Samuel O Ngene; Babatunde Adedokun; Prisca Adejumo; Olufunmilayo Olopade
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Looking to the future: incorporating genomic information into disparities research to reduce measurement error and selection bias.

Authors:  Alexandra E Shields; William H Crown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Why Breast Cancer Risk by the Numbers Is Not Enough: Evaluation of a Decision Aid in Multi-Ethnic, Low-Numerate Women.

Authors:  Rita Kukafka; Haeseung Yi; Tong Xiao; Parijatham Thomas; Alejandra Aguirre; Cindy Smalletz; Raven David; Katherine Crew
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Incorporating genomics into breast and prostate cancer screening: assessing the implications.

Authors:  Susmita Chowdhury; Tom Dent; Nora Pashayan; Alison Hall; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Nina Hallowell; Per Hall; Paul Pharoah; Hilary Burton
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Does a medical history of hypertension influence disclosing genetic testing results of the risk for salt-sensitive hypertension, in primary care?

Authors:  Masanobu Okayama; Taro Takeshima; Masanori Harada; Ryusuke Ae; Eiji Kajii
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2016-07-27

8.  Primary care patient willingness for genetic testing for salt-sensitive hypertension: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Masanobu Okayama; Taro Takeshima; Ryusuke Ae; Masanori Harada; Eiji Kajii
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.497

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.