Literature DB >> 19911626

Integrating gaze direction and sexual dimorphism of face shape when perceiving the dominance of others.

Julie C Main1, Benedict C Jones, Lisa M DeBruine, Anthony C Little.   

Abstract

Although gaze direction and face shape have each been shown to affect perceptions of the dominance of others, the question whether gaze direction and face shape have independent main effects on perceptions of dominance, and whether these effects interact, has not yet been studied. To investigate this issue, we compared dominance ratings of faces with masculinised shapes and direct gaze, masculinised shapes and averted gaze, feminised shapes and direct gaze, and feminised shapes and averted gaze. While faces with direct gaze were generally rated as more dominant than those with averted gaze, this effect of gaze direction was greater when judging faces with masculinised shapes than when judging faces with feminised shapes. Additionally, faces with masculinised shapes were rated as more dominant than those with feminised shapes when faces were presented with direct gaze, but not when faces were presented with averted gaze. Collectively, these findings reveal an interaction between the effects of gaze direction and sexually dimorphic facial cues on judgments of the dominance of others, presenting novel evidence for the existence of complex integrative processes that underpin social perception of faces. Integrating information from face shape and gaze cues may increase the efficiency with which we perceive the dominance of others.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19911626     DOI: 10.1068/p6347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  7 in total

Review 1.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Intergroup threat gates social attention in humans.

Authors:  Yujie Chen; Yufang Zhao
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Facing aggression: cues differ for female versus male faces.

Authors:  Shawn N Geniole; Amanda E Keyes; Catherine J Mondloch; Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Direct Speaker Gaze Promotes Trust in Truth-Ambiguous Statements.

Authors:  Helene Kreysa; Luise Kessler; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Africans and Europeans differ in their facial perception of dominance and sex-typicality: a multidimensional Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Vojtěch Fiala; Petr Tureček; Robert Mbe Akoko; Šimon Pokorný; Karel Kleisner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers.

Authors:  Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine; Julie C Main; Anthony C Little; Lisa L M Welling; David R Feinberg; Bernard P Tiddeman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Cues of Social Status: Associations Between Attractiveness, Dominance, and Status.

Authors:  Danny Rahal; Melissa R Fales; Martie G Haselton; George M Slavich; Theodore F Robles
Journal:  Evol Psychol       Date:  2021-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.