Literature DB >> 1991115

Effects of bulge composition and flanking sequence on the kinking of DNA by bulged bases.

Y H Wang1, J Griffith.   

Abstract

We recently showed that bulged bases kink duplex DNA, with the degree of kinking increasing in roughly equal increments as the number of bases in the bulge increases from one to four [Hsieh, C.-H., & Griffith, J.D. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 4833-4837]. Here we have examined the kinking of DNA by single A, C, G, or T bulges with different neighboring base pairs. Synthetic 30 base pair (bp) duplex DNAs containing 2 single-base bulges spaced by 10 bp were ligated head to tail, and their electrophoretic behavior in highly cross-linked gels was examined. All bulge-containing DNAs showed marked electrophoretic retardations as compared to non-bulge-containing DNA. Regardless of the sequence of the flanking base pairs, purine bulges produced greater retardations than pyrimidine bulges. Furthermore, C and T bulges produced the same retardations as did G and A bulges. Bulged DNA containing different flanking base pairs showed marked differences in electrophoretic mobility. For C-bulged DNA, the greatest retardations were observed with G.C neighbors, the least with T.A neighbors, and an intermediate amount with a mixture of neighboring base pairs. For A-bulged DNA, the retardations were greatest with G.C neighbors, less with T.A neighbors, even less with a mixture of neighboring base pairs, and finally least with C.G neighbors. Thus flanking base pairs affect C-bulged DNA and A-bulged DNA differently, and G.C and C.G flanking base pairs were seen to have very different effects. These results imply an important role of base stacking in determining how neighboring base pairs influence the kinking of DNA by a single-base bulge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1991115     DOI: 10.1021/bi00219a028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  19 in total

Review 1.  Methods for subtyping and molecular comparison of human viral genomes.

Authors:  M Arens
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Position and degree of mismatches and the mobility of DNA heteroduplexes.

Authors:  D A Upchurch; R Shankarappa; J I Mullins
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Distinguishing "looped-out" and "stacked-in" DNA bulge conformation using fluorescent 2-aminopurine replacing a purine base.

Authors:  Yugao Jiao; Sandra Stringfellow; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2002-04

4.  Conformations of an adenine bulge in a DNA octamer and its influence on DNA structure from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  M Feig; M Zacharias; B M Pettitt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Evolutionary variants of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 V3 region characterized by using a heteroduplex tracking assay.

Authors:  J A Nelson; S A Fiscus; R Swanstrom
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  A practical approach to genetic screening for influenza virus variants.

Authors:  S Zou
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Kinking of DNA and RNA helices by bulged nucleotides observed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer.

Authors:  C Gohlke; A I Murchie; D M Lilley; R M Clegg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Kinking of DNA and RNA by base bulges.

Authors:  D M Lilley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  RNA helical imperfections regulate activation of the protein kinase PKR: effects of bulge position, size, and geometry.

Authors:  Laurie A Heinicke; Subba Rao Nallagatla; Chelsea M Hull; Philip C Bevilacqua
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.942

10.  Structural analysis of slipped-strand DNA (S-DNA) formed in (CTG)n. (CAG)n repeats from the myotonic dystrophy locus.

Authors:  C E Pearson; Y H Wang; J D Griffith; R R Sinden
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.