Literature DB >> 19910765

Neck muscle load distribution in lateral, frontal, and rear-end impacts: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Sofia Hedenstierna1, Peter Halldin, Gunter P Siegmund.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A finite element (FE) model of the human neck was used to study the distribution of neck muscle loads during multidirectional impacts. The computed load distributions were compared to experimental electromyography (EMG) recordings.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify passive muscle loads in nonactive cervical muscles during impacts of varying direction and energy, using a three-dimensional (3D) continuum FE muscle model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Experimental and numerical studies have confirmed the importance of muscles in the impact response of the neck. Although EMG has been used to measure the relative activity levels in neck muscles during impact tests, this technique has not been able to measure all neck muscles and cannot directly quantify the force distribution between the muscles. A numerical model can give additional insight into muscle loading during impact.
METHODS: An FE model with solid element musculature was used to simulate frontal, lateral, and rear-end vehicle impacts at 4 peak accelerations. The peak cross-sectional forces, internal energies, and effective strains were calculated for each muscle and impact configuration. The computed load distribution was compared with experimental EMG data.
RESULTS: The load distribution in the cervical muscles varied with load direction. Peak sectional forces, internal energies, and strains increased in most muscles with increasing impact acceleration. The dominant muscles identified by the model for each direction were splenius capitis, levator scapulae, and sternocleidomastoid in lateral impacts, splenius capitis, and trapezoid in frontal impacts, and sternocleidomastoid, rectus capitis posterior minor, and hyoids in rear-end impacts. This corresponded with the most active muscles identified by EMG recordings, although within these muscles the distribution of forces and EMG levels were not the same.
CONCLUSION: The passive muscle forces, strains, and energies computed using a continuum FE model of the cervical musculature distinguished between impact directions and peak accelerations, and on the basis of prior studies, isolated the most important muscles for each direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19910765     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b46bdd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Distribution characteristics of meridian sinew (jingjin) syndrome in 313 cases of whiplash-associated disorders.

Authors:  Ye-meng Chen; Yan Zhao; Xiao-lin Xue; Qun-ce Zhang; Xiu-yan Wu; Hui Li; Xin Zheng; Joanna Zhao; Frank D He; Jun-hui Kong; Tian-fang Wang
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 1.978

2.  Effect of the Suboccipital Musculature on Symptom Severity and Recovery after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  S Fakhran; C Qu; L M Alhilali
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Simulated effects of head movement on contact pressures between headforms and N95 filtering facepiece respirators-part 1: headform model and validation.

Authors:  Zhipeng Lei; Xuewu Ji; Ning Li; James Yang; Ziqing Zhuang; Dana Rottach
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-09-03

4.  EXERCISE, MANUAL THERAPY AND POSTURAL RE-EDUCATION FOR UNCONTROLLED EAR TWITCHING AND RELATED IMPAIRMENTS AFTER WHIPLASH INJURY: A CASE REPORT.

Authors:  Kelsey Flanders; Heather Feldner
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-10

5.  A Novel Approach to Measuring Muscle Mechanics in Vehicle Collision Conditions.

Authors:  Simon Krašna; Srđan Đorđević; Marija Hribernik; Ana Trajkovski
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Morphology and composition of the ventral neck muscles in individuals with chronic whiplash related disorders compared to matched healthy controls: a cross-sectional case-control study.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Anette Karlsson; Gunnel Peterson; Hanna Borén; Peter Zsigmond; James M Elliott; Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 7.  Application of Simulation Methods in Cervical Spine Dynamics.

Authors:  Meng-Si Sun; Xin-Yi Cai; Qing Liu; Cheng-Fei Du; Zhong-Jun Mo
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.682

8.  Estimating the Effects of Awareness on Neck-Muscle Loading in Frontal Impacts with EMG and MC Sensors.

Authors:  Simon Krašna; Srđan Đorđević
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.