Literature DB >> 1991036

Differential segregation of human and hamster cathepsin D in transfected baby-hamster kidney cells.

C Isidoro1, M Horst, F M Baccino, A Hasilik.   

Abstract

The segregation of human cathepsin D, studied in baby-hamster kidney cells (BHK) transfected with human cathepsin D cDNA and compared with that of hamster cathepsin D in the same cells, showed that, in cells that expressed human cathepsin D at a low rate, most of the enzyme remained intracellular. In contrast, when the enzyme was expressed at a high rate, most was secreted. The segregation was examined with an anti-(human cathepsin D) antibody that reacted with the human enzyme exclusively and an anti-(rat cathepsin D) antibody that reacted with both enzymes. In one protocol the cells were metabolically labelled and the two antibodies were used in sequence to precipitate the enzymes from extracts of cells and medium. High expression of the human enzyme did not interfere with the segregation of hamster cathepsin D. In another protocol the activity of cathepsin D in cells and medium was measured before and after titration with anti-(human cathepsin D) antiserum. Human cathepsin D was found predominantly in the medium, and hamster cathepsin D mainly in the cells. In the presence of 10 mM-NH4Cl the intracellular segregation of hamster cathepsin D was strongly inhibited, while the segregation of human cathepsin D was only slightly diminished. In BHK cells, at least two systems participate in the sorting of the two cathepsins, one of them being rather insensitive to NH4Cl.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1991036      PMCID: PMC1149854          DOI: 10.1042/bj2730363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem J        ISSN: 0264-6021            Impact factor:   3.857


  31 in total

1.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.

Authors:  O H LOWRY; N J ROSEBROUGH; A L FARR; R J RANDALL
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Changes in rat liver immunoreactive cathepsin D after cycloheximide.

Authors:  M Musi; L Tessitore; G Bonelli; O V Kazakova; F M Baccino
Journal:  Biochem Int       Date:  1985-02

3.  Enhanced degradation of cathepsin D synthesized in the presence of the threonine analog beta-hydroxynorvaline.

Authors:  M Hentze; A Hasilik; K von Figura
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.013

4.  Biosynthesis of lysosomal enzymes in fibroblasts. Phosphorylation of mannose residues.

Authors:  A Hasilik; E F Neufeld
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1980-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Cathepsinogen D: characterization and activation to cathepsin D and inhibitory peptides.

Authors:  V Puizdar; V Turk
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1981-09-28       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Early events in the biosynthesis of the lysosomal enzyme cathepsin D.

Authors:  A H Erickson; G Blobel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1979-12-10       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Processing of human cathepsin D in lysosomes in vitro.

Authors:  V Gieselmann; A Hasilik; K von Figura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1985-03-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  I-cell disease and pseudo-Hurler polydystrophy: heterozygote detection and characteristics of the altered N-acetyl-glucosamine-phosphotransferase in genetic variants.

Authors:  O T Mueller; L E Little; A L Miller; C B Lozzio; T B Shows
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1985-08-30       Impact factor: 3.786

9.  Lysosomal enzyme precursors in human fibroblasts. Activation of cathepsin D precursor in vitro and activity of beta-hexosaminidase A precursor towards ganglioside GM2.

Authors:  A Hasilik; K von Figura; E Conzelmann; H Nehrkorn; K Sandhoff
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1982-07

10.  Biosynthesis of lysosomal hydrolases: their synthesis in bound polysomes and the role of co- and post-translational processing in determining their subcellular distribution.

Authors:  M G Rosenfeld; G Kreibich; D Popov; K Kato; D D Sabatini
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The early and late processing of lysosomal enzymes: proteolysis and compartmentation.

Authors:  A Hasilik
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1992-02-15

2.  Effect of carbohydrate position on lysosomal transport of procathepsin L.

Authors:  R G Lingeman; D S Joy; M A Sherman; S E Kane
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  Lysosomal proteolysis and autophagy require presenilin 1 and are disrupted by Alzheimer-related PS1 mutations.

Authors:  Ju-Hyun Lee; W Haung Yu; Asok Kumar; Sooyeon Lee; Panaiyur S Mohan; Corrinne M Peterhoff; Devin M Wolfe; Marta Martinez-Vicente; Ashish C Massey; Guy Sovak; Yasuo Uchiyama; David Westaway; Ana Maria Cuervo; Ralph A Nixon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Differentiation-dependent autophagy controls the fate of newly synthesized N-linked glycoproteins in the colon adenocarcinoma HT-29 cell line.

Authors:  J J Houri; E Ogier-Denis; D De Stefanis; C Bauvy; F M Baccino; C Isidoro; P Codogno
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Knock-down of cathepsin D affects the retinal pigment epithelium, impairs swim-bladder ontogenesis and causes premature death in zebrafish.

Authors:  Carlo Follo; Matteo Ozzano; Vera Mugoni; Roberta Castino; Massimo Santoro; Ciro Isidoro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mutant Rab7 causes the accumulation of cathepsin D and cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor in an early endocytic compartment.

Authors:  B Press; Y Feng; B Hoflack; A Wandinger-Ness
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-03-09       Impact factor: 10.539

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.