Literature DB >> 19910250

Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study.

Ana Ignjatovic1, James E East, Noriko Suzuki, Margaret Vance, Thomas Guenther, Brian P Saunders.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate optical diagnosis of small (<10 mm) colorectal polyps in vivo, without formal histopathology, could make colonoscopy more efficient and cost effective. The aim of this study was to assess whether optical diagnosis of small polyps is feasible and safe in routine clinical practice.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with a positive faecal occult blood test or previous adenomas undergoing surveillance at St Mark's Hospital (London, UK), from June 19, 2008, to June 16, 2009, were included in this prospective study. Four colonoscopists with different levels of experience predicted polyp histology using optical diagnosis with high-definition white light, followed by narrow-band imaging without magnification and chromoendoscopy, as required. The primary outcome was accuracy of polyp characterisation using optical diagnosis compared with histopathology, the current gold standard. Accuracy of optical diagnosis to predict the next surveillance interval was also assessed and compared with surveillance intervals predicted by current guidelines using histopathology. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00888771.
FINDINGS: 363 polyps smaller than 10 mm were detected in 130 patients, of which 278 polyps had both optical and histopathological diagnosis. By histology, 198 of these polyps were adenomas and 80 were non-neoplastic lesions (of which 62 were hyperplastic). Optical diagnosis accurately diagnosed 186 of 198 adenomas (sensitivity 0.94; 95% CI 0.90-0.97) and 55 of 62 hyperplastic polyps (specificity 0.89; 0.78-0.95), with an overall accuracy of 241 of 260 (0.93, 0.89-0.96) for polyp characterisation. Using optical diagnosis alone, 82 of 130 patients could be given a surveillance interval immediately after colonoscopy, and the same interval was found after formal histopathology in 80 patients (98%) using British guidelines and in 78 patients (95%) using US multisociety guidelines.
INTERPRETATION: For polyps less than 10 mm in size, in-vivo optical diagnosis seems to be an acceptable strategy to assess polyp histopathology and future surveillance intervals. Dispensing with formal histopathology for most small polyps found at colonoscopy could improve the efficiency of the procedure and lead to substantial savings in time and cost. FUNDING: Leigh Family Trust, London, UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19910250     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70329-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  114 in total

1.  Risks and potential cost savings of not sending diminutive polyps for histologic examination.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2012-02

2.  Factors associated with adherence to the recommended postpolypectomy surveillance interval.

Authors:  Eun Ran Kim; Dong Hyun Sinn; Jin Yong Kim; Dong Kyung Chang; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim; Jong Chul Rhee; Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Feasibility of cold snare polypectomy in Japan: A pilot study.

Authors:  Yoji Takeuchi; Takeshi Yamashina; Noriko Matsuura; Takashi Ito; Mototsugu Fujii; Kengo Nagai; Fumi Matsui; Tomofumi Akasaka; Noboru Hanaoka; Koji Higashino; Hiroyasu Iishi; Ryu Ishihara; Henrik Thorlacius; Noriya Uedo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-11-25

4.  Risk factors for polyp retrieval failure in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Carlos Fernandes; Rolando Pinho; Iolanda Ribeiro; Joana Silva; Ana Ponte; João Carvalho
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Management and risk factors for incomplete resection associated with jumbo forceps polypectomy for diminutive colorectal polyps: a single-institution retrospective study.

Authors:  Naoki Asayama; Shinji Nagata; Kenjiro Shigita; Yutaro Ogawa; Hirosato Tamari; Taiki Aoyama; Akira Fukumoto; Shinichi Mukai; Mayumi Kaneko
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Computer-generated surface and tone enhancements to distinguish neoplastic from non-neoplastic colon polyps less than 1 cm in diameter.

Authors:  Ming-Lun Han; Yi-Chia Lee; Chieh-Chang Chen; Yu-Jen Fang; Ji-Yuh Lee; Tzu-Ling Lin; Long-Wei Lin; Ping-Huei Tseng; Ming-Shiang Wu; Hsiu-Po Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The Resect-and-Discard Strategy for Management of Small and Diminutive Colonic Polyps.

Authors:  Franco Radaelli
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-05

8.  Real-time endoscopic pathology assessment of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-11

Review 9.  High-resolution microendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Justin S Louie; Richa Shukla; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.043

Review 10.  Indications, stains and techniques in chromoendoscopy.

Authors:  P J Trivedi; B Braden
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2012-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.