Literature DB >> 19909829

Effects of intermittent intravenous ibandronate injections on bone quality and micro-architecture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: the DIVA study.

Robert R Recker1, Louis-George Ste-Marie, Bente Langdahl, Edward Czerwinski, Bernard Bonvoisin, Daiva Masanauskaite, Lucy Rowell, Dieter Felsenberg.   

Abstract

In the Dosing IntraVenous Administration (DIVA) study, IV ibandronate injections (15-30 s duration) provided significantly greater gains in bone mineral density than daily oral ibandronate (P<0.001). Single transiliac bone biopsy was performed in a subgroup of women (n=109/1395) from DIVA to assess the impact of ibandronate on newly formed bone and bone remodeling. Patients received ibandronate IV injections 2 mg every 2 months, 3 mg every 3 months or oral ibandronate 2.5 mg daily, plus oral or IV placebo, as appropriate to maintain blinding. Of the 1395 participants from the DIVA study, 122 were enrolled in the substudy. Qualitative histological analysis was performed on all biopsy cores and 89 cores were considered to be evaluable for quantitative histomorphometry. Following 2 years of ibandronate treatment, trabecular bone maintained its normal lamellar structure with no evidence of woven bone, marrow fibrosis, cellular toxicity, or other qualitative abnormalities. Primary mineralization of new bone remained normal, as indicated by the slightly lower osteoid thickness and osteoid volume, with normal mineral apposition rate compared to healthy, postmenopausal women. Mineralizing surface, osteoid surface, activation frequency and bone formation rate were decreased in all ibandronate-treated groups compared with values from healthy, postmenopausal women. Specifically, the bone formation rate (BFR/BV and BFR/BS) was approximately 5 times lower in the ibandronate-treated (3 mg) group than in healthy, postmenopausal women. Histomorphometric analysis of transiliac bone biopsies demonstrated normal micro-structure of newly formed bone with normal mineralization and reduced remodeling after oral or IV ibandronate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19909829     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  11 in total

1.  Efficacy of ibandronate: a long term confirmation.

Authors:  Ombretta Di Munno; Andrea Delle Sedie
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-01

2.  Comparative effects of teriparatide and ibandronate on spine bone mineral density (BMD) and microarchitecture (TBS) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a 2-year open-label study.

Authors:  C Senn; B Günther; A W Popp; R Perrelet; D Hans; K Lippuner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Application of modeling and simulation to a long-term clinical trial: a direct comparison of simulated data and data actually observed in Japanese osteoporosis patients following 3-year ibandronate treatment.

Authors:  Kiyohiko Nakai; Satofumi Iida; Masato Tobinai; Junko Hashimoto; Takehiko Kawanishi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  From histology to micro-CT: Measuring and modeling resorption cavities and their relation to bone competence.

Authors:  Jef Vanderoost; G Harry van Lenthe
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-28

5.  Medical treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Bente Lomholt Langdahl; Torben Harsløf
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 6.  Bisphosphonates and bone quality.

Authors:  Michael Pazianas; Stefan van der Geest; Paul Miller
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-05-07

7.  Bone safety with risedronate: histomorphometric studies at different dose levels and exposure.

Authors:  R R Recker; L-G Ste-Marie; P Chavassieux; M R McClung; M W Lundy
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Dose-Effectiveness Relationships Determining the Efficacy of Ibandronate for Management of Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yanjie Hou; Ke Gu; Chao Xu; Huiyong Ding; Changxin Liu; Yilihamu Tuoheti
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Clinical efficacy on fracture risk and safety of 0.5 mg or 1 mg/month intravenous ibandronate versus 2.5 mg/day oral risedronate in patients with primary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Toshitaka Nakamura; Tetsuo Nakano; Masako Ito; Hiroshi Hagino; Junko Hashimoto; Masato Tobinai; Hideki Mizunuma
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Predictors of Ibandronate Efficacy for the Management of Osteoporosis: A Meta-Regression Analysis.

Authors:  Zeren Ma; Yong Li; Ming Zhou; Kedi Huang; Hejun Hu; Xiaoping Liu; Xiaosheng Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.