Literature DB >> 19909747

Comparison of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of colon polyps.

Anna M Buchner1, Muhammad W Shahid, Michael G Heckman, Murli Krishna, Marwan Ghabril, Muhammad Hasan, Julia E Crook, Victoria Gomez, Massimo Raimondo, Timothy Woodward, Herbert C Wolfsen, Michael B Wallace.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) allows in vivo imaging of tissue at micron resolution. Virtual chromoendoscopy systems, such as Fujinon intelligent color enhancement and narrow band imaging, also have potential to differentiate neoplastic colorectal lesions. The accuracy of these systems in clinical practice is, however, unknown. Our primary aim was to compare sensitivity and specificity of pCLE to virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of colorectal polyps using histopathology as a gold standard. A secondary aim was to compare sensitivity and specificity of pCLE to virtual chromoendoscopy using a modified gold standard that assumed that all polyps >/=10 mm had malignant potential and were considered neoplastic or high risk.
METHODS: Patients underwent colonoscopy using high-resolution colonoscopes. The surface pit pattern was determined with NBI or FICE in all patients. Confocal images were recorded and subsequently analyzed offline, blinded to the endoscopic characteristics and histopathology. Each polyp was diagnosed as benign or neoplastic based on confocal features according to modified Mainz criteria.
RESULTS: A total of 119 polyps (81 neoplastic, 38 hyperplastic) from 75 patients was assessed. The pCLE had higher sensitivity compared to virtual chromoendoscopy when considering histopathology as gold standard (91% vs 77%; P = .010) and modified gold standard (88% vs 76%; P = .037). There was no statistically significant difference in specificity between pCLE and virtual chromoendoscopy when considering histopathology or modified gold standard.
CONCLUSIONS: Confocal endomicroscopy demonstrated higher sensitivity with similar specificity in classification of colorectal polyps. These new methods may replace the need for ex vivo histological confirmation of small polyps, but further studies are warranted. Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19909747     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.10.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  64 in total

1.  Endoscopic imaging: How far are we from real-time histology?

Authors:  Richa Shukla; Wasif M Abidi; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10-16

2.  Robot-assisted transvaginal peritoneoscopy using confocal endomicroscopy: a feasibility study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Richard C Newton; David P Noonan; Valentina Vitiello; James Clark; Christopher J Payne; Jianzhong Shang; Mikael Sodergren; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Molecular body imaging: MR imaging, CT, and US. part I. principles.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Screening: Endomicroscopy for a reliable diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Ralf Kiesslich
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Colonoscopic polypectomy and associated techniques.

Authors:  Christopher-J Fyock; Peter-V Draganov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Spectrally encoded confocal microscopy of esophageal tissues at 100 kHz line rate.

Authors:  Simon C Schlachter; Dongkyun Kang; Michalina J Gora; Paulino Vacas-Jacques; Tao Wu; Robert W Carruth; Eric J Wilsterman; Brett E Bouma; Kevin Woods; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Endoscopic probe optics for spectrally encoded confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Dongkyun Kang; Robert W Carruth; Minkyu Kim; Simon C Schlachter; Milen Shishkov; Kevin Woods; Nima Tabatabaei; Tao Wu; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Pilot study on probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for colorectal neoplasms: an initial experience in Japan.

Authors:  Seiichiro Abe; Yutaka Saito; Yasuhiro Oono; Yusaku Tanaka; Taku Sakamoto; Masayoshi Yamada; Takeshi Nakajima; Takahisa Matsuda; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Tomonori Yano; Shigeki Sekine; Motohiro Kojima; Hidetsugu Yamagishi; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Colonic manifestations of PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome: case series and systematic review.

Authors:  Peter P Stanich; Robert Pilarski; Jonathan Rock; Wendy L Frankel; Samer El-Dika; Marty M Meyer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  High-resolution microendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Justin S Louie; Richa Shukla; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.