Literature DB >> 19909594

Vitrification of biopsied embryos at cleavage, morula and blastocyst stage.

Xiao Zhang1, Krinos M Trokoudes, Constantinos Pavlides.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of vitrification on biopsied embryos at various developmental stages. After biopsy on day 3, embryos were vitrified at cleavage, morula and blastocyst stages using a commercially available kit. Nonbiopsied embryos were vitrified as controls. For day-3 cleavage embryo vitrification, embryos from abnormally fertilized oocytes were randomly allocated to the biopsy and control groups. For morula and blastocyst vitrification, the embryos used in the biopsy groups were obtained from aneuploidy or affected embryos diagnosed by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). After warming, survival, blastulation and development of embryos in different groups were compared. The survival rate after warming in the non-biopsied cleavage control group was significantly higher than in the biopsied cleavage group (92.0% versus 64.0%, P = 0.037). Most of the biopsied embryos were destroyed due to blastomeres escaping. At the morula stage, both biopsied and non-biopsied embryos had similar survival rates. However, a significantly higher survival rate (95.6%) was observed in the biopsied blastocyst group compared with the control group (81.3%, P = 0.035). Biopsied embryos vitrified at an advanced stage had as high survival rates as non-biopsied embryos. Vitrification at the blastocyst stage is a practical and efficient solution for embryo cryopreservation during PGD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19909594     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  9 in total

1.  Outcomes of day 3 embryo transfer with vitrification using Cryoleaf: a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Xing-ling Wang; Xiao Zhang; Yao-qin Qin; Da-yong Hao; Hui-rong Shi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Vitrified blastocysts from Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) as a source for human Embryonic Stem Cell (hESC) derivation.

Authors:  Begoña Aran; Miquel Sole; Ignasi Rodriguez-Pizà; Mònica Parriego; Yolanda Muñoz; Montserrat Boada; Pere N Barri; Juan Carlos Izpisúa; Anna Veiga
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Human cleavage-stage embryo vitrification is comparable to slow-rate cryopreservation in cycles of assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Martin Graham Wilding; Clemente Capobianco; Nadia Montanaro; Genc Kabili; Loredana Di Matteo; Enrico Fusco; Brian Dale
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Survival, re-expansion and cell survival of human blastocysts following vitrification and warming using two vitrification systems.

Authors:  Ana S Lopes; Veerle Frederickx; Gunther Van Kerkhoven; Rudi Campo; Patrick Puttemans; Stephan Gordts
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Short-term storage of tripronucleated human embryos.

Authors:  Noelia Grau; Belén Aparicio; Laura Escrich; Amparo Mercader; Arantzazu Delgado; José Remohí; María-José Escribá
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Timing day-3 vitrification for PGT-M embryos: pre- or post-blastomere biopsy?

Authors:  Adva Aizer; Chen Shimon; Olga Dratviman-Storobinsky; Hagit Shani; Noa Harel Inbar; Ettie Maman; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Anil Biricik; Rocio P Cotarelo; Elisabetta Iammarone; Patrizia Rubino; Jan Tesarik; Francesco Fiorentino; Maria Giulia Minasi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-01-14

Review 8.  Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.

Authors:  Laura Rienzi; Clarisa Gracia; Roberta Maggiulli; Andrew R LaBarbera; Daniel J Kaser; Filippo M Ubaldi; Sheryl Vanderpoel; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Systematic assessment of the performance of whole-genome amplification for SNP/CNV detection and β-thalassemia genotyping.

Authors:  Fei He; Wanjun Zhou; Ren Cai; Tizhen Yan; Xiangmin Xu
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.