Literature DB >> 19908192

Contacts between poultry farms, their spatial dimension and their relevance for avian influenza preparedness.

Lena Fiebig1, Timo Smieszek, Jennifer Saurina, Jan Hattendorf, Jakob Zinsstag.   

Abstract

Ongoing economic losses by and exposure of humans to highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in poultry flocks across Asia and parts of Africa and Europe motivate also outbreak-free countries such as Switzerland to invest in preparedness planning. Country-specific population data on between-farm contacts are required to anticipate probable patterns of pathogen spread. Information is scarce; in particular on how strongly small, non-commercial poultry farms are involved in between-farm contacts. We aimed to identify between-farm contacts of interest for HPAI spread at both commercial and non-commercial farms in a non-outbreak situation: whether or not commercial and non-commercial farms were involved in poultry and person movements and shared resources by company integration. Focus was on poultry movements for the purpose of purchase, sale and poultry show visits, their spatial dimension, their frequencies and the farm types they connected. Of the total 49,437 recorded poultry farms in Switzerland, 95% had less than 500 birds. The farm number resulted in densities of up to 8 poultry farms per km2 and a median number of 47 neighbour farms within a 3 km radius around the farms. Person movements and shared resources were identified in 78% of the surveyed farms (93% among commercials, 67% among non-commercials). Poultry trading movements over extensive spatial ranges were stated at 65% (79% among commercials, 55% among non-commercials). Movement frequencies depended on farm specialization and were higher for commercial than for non-commercial farms except for poultry show visits. Estimates however for the entire population revealed 3.5 times higher chances of a poultry purchase, and 14.6 times higher chances of exhibiting birds at poultry shows occurring in a given time by a farm smaller than 500 birds (non-commercial farm) than by a larger (commercial) farm. These findings indicate that both commercial and non-commercial farms are involved in neighbourhood and remote between-farm contacts relevant to HPAI spread. It is necessary to include all poultry farms, irrespective of their size and purpose in both livestock registration and disease surveillance systems, as well as in transmission models for poultry and zoonotic diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19908192     DOI: 10.4081/gh.2009.212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geospat Health        ISSN: 1827-1987            Impact factor:   1.212


  5 in total

Review 1.  Infectious disease transmission and contact networks in wildlife and livestock.

Authors:  Meggan E Craft
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The emergence and diversification of panzootic H5N1 influenza viruses.

Authors:  Yi Guan; Gavin J D Smith
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 3.303

3.  How should social mixing be measured: comparing web-based survey and sensor-based methods.

Authors:  Timo Smieszek; Victoria C Barclay; Indulaxmi Seeni; Jeanette J Rainey; Hongjiang Gao; Amra Uzicanin; Marcel Salathé
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Quantification of dust-borne transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus between chickens.

Authors:  Dieuwertje Spekreijse; Annemarie Bouma; Guus Koch; Arjan Stegeman
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Knowledge and remaining gaps on the role of animal and human movements in the poultry production and trade networks in the global spread of avian influenza viruses - A scoping review.

Authors:  Claire Hautefeuille; Gwenaëlle Dauphin; Marisa Peyre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.