Literature DB >> 19907387

Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait.

Catharine M Walsh1, Simon C Ling, Charlie S Wang, Heather Carnahan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Feedback is an important feature of simulation-based education. This study investigated the optimal timing of feedback for technical skills learning in novices.
METHOD: Thirty novice endoscopists were pretested on a colonoscopy simulator task. Participants then received feedback either during (concurrent) or after (terminal) each of their 12 practice trials. Effectiveness of training was assessed using an immediate posttest and one week later on retention and transfer tests. Measures included execution time and blinded expert assessments.
RESULTS: Both groups performed similarly on the pre-, post-, and retention tests. At transfer, the terminal feedback group performed significantly better as measured by execution time, checklist, and global rating scores. The concurrent feedback group's performance decreased significantly on the transfer test as compared with the posttest and retention test.
CONCLUSIONS: Not all feedback conditions seem equally effective. The use of terminal feedback resulted in better learning as demonstrated by superior performance during transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19907387     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b38daf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  22 in total

1.  Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training.

Authors:  Matthew S Holden; Chang Nancy Wang; Kyle MacNeil; Ben Church; Lawrence Hookey; Gabor Fichtinger; Tamas Ungi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Catch the moment: The power of turning mistakes into 'precious' learning opportunities.

Authors:  Emanuela Ferretti; Kristina Rohde; Gregory P Moore; Thierry Daboval
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Preoperative Practice Paired With Instructor Feedback May Not Improve Obstetrics-Gynecology Residents' Operative Performance.

Authors:  Jamie Kroft; Michael Ordon; Leslie Po; Nora Zwingerman; Katie Waters; Jason Y Lee; Richard Pittini
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-04

4.  Development and roll out of the JETS e-portfolio: a web based electronic portfolio for endoscopists.

Authors:  T Mehta; K Dowler; B C McKaig; R M Valori; P Dunckley
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-20

5.  Educator-student talk during interprofessional simulation-based teaching.

Authors:  Bianca N Jackson; Alana Brady; Philippa Friary; Andrea Braakhuis; Julia Sekula; Anna Miles
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-06-30

6.  Push and pull factors impacting the pedagogical approaches used by sonographers to teach scanning skills.

Authors:  Delwyn Nicholls; Linda Sweet; Jon Hyett; Amanda Müller
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-08-14

7.  A survey of Australian sonographer psychomotor teaching practices.

Authors:  Delwyn Nicholls; Linda Sweet; Jon Hyett; Amanda Müller
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-08-18

8.  Sonographer Skill Teaching Practices Survey: Development and initial validation of a survey instrument.

Authors:  Delwyn Nicholls; Linda Sweet; Pawel Skuza; Amanda Muller; Jon Hyett
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2016-05-11

9.  Impressions on Reliability and Students' Perceptions of Learning in a Peer-Based OSCE.

Authors:  Rishad Khan; Saad Chahine; Steven Macaluso; Ricardo Viana; Caitlin Cassidy; Thomas Miller; Debra Bartley; Michael Payne
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-02-18

10.  Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Rishad Khan; Joanne Plahouras; Bradley C Johnston; Michael A Scaffidi; Samir C Grover; Catharine M Walsh
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.