Literature DB >> 19906412

Late morbidity following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

D Cibula1, P Velechovska, J Sláma, D Fischerova, I Pinkavova, D Pavlista, P Dundr, M Hill, P Freitag, M Zikan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Nerve-sparing (NS) modification of radical hysterectomy (RH) has been developed with the main purpose of improving the quality of life after radical surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. Although the procedure has been discussed for almost 30 years, there are only limited data available on late morbidity. The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the morbidity of patients before and 6 months after NS RH and compare that with the morbidity in patients following different types of parametrectomy without nerve sparing.
METHODS: Multiple parameters were assessed prospectively using 20-item self-reported questionnaire, focusing on three main areas of morbidity: bladder, sexual, and anorectal functions. Excluded were patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy.
RESULTS: Enrolled were women following NS RH (N=32), type C RH (N=19), and type D RH (N=21). Nine parameters significantly deteriorate in the whole group after the treatment: defecation straining (p=0.03), defecation regularity (p=0.0006), defecation frequency (p=0.02), need to use laxatives (p<0.001), flatulence incontinence (p<0.001), urinary incontinence (p<0.001), nocturia (p=0.002), loss of bladder sensation (p=0.04), and straining to void (p<0.001). There were significant differences (p<0.05) between groups following NS and type C or D RH in changes of following parameters: defecation regularity, receptivity to sexual activity, urinary incontinence, nocturia, and straining to void, while no differences were found between type C and D RH. Minimal changes were observed in any of 10 parameters of sexual functions.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed a significant negative impact of RH on bladder and anorectal functions. Autonomic nerve preservation significantly improved morbidity 6 months after treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19906412     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  9 in total

Review 1.  Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Khadra Galaal; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-12

Review 2.  Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Perineural invasion in early-stage cervical cancer and its relevance following surgery.

Authors:  Yi Zhu; Guonan Zhang; Yan Yang; Ling Cui; Shijun Jia; Yu Shi; Shuiqin Song; Shiqiang Xu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Benefit of robot-assisted laparoscopy in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: urinary morbidity in early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fabrice Narducci; Pierre Collinet; Benjamin Merlot; Eric Lambaudie; Loic Boulanger; Daniele Lefebvre-Kuntz; Philippe Nickers; Sophie Taieb; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Eric Leblanc
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Effects of Hysterectomy on Sexual Function.

Authors:  Risa Lonnée-Hoffmann; Ingrid Pinas
Journal:  Curr Sex Health Rep       Date:  2014

6.  Oncologic effectiveness of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Antonino Ditto; Giorgio Bogani; Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore; Fabio Martinelli; Valentina Chiappa; Carlos Lopez; Stefania Perotto; Domenica Lorusso; Francesco Raspagliesi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Nerve-sparing versus non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: surgical and long-term oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Antonio Gil-Moreno; Melchor Carbonell-Socias; Sabina Salicrú; Melissa Bradbury; Ángel García; Ramona Vergés; Oriol Puig Puig; José Luís Sánchez-Iglesias; Silvia Cabrera-Díaz; Javier de la Torre; Natalia R Gómez-Hidalgo; Assumpció Pérez-Benavente; Berta Díaz-Feijoo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-07-16

Review 8.  Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Long; De-Sheng Yao; Xin-Wei Pan; Ting-Yu Ou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting factors for resumption of spontaneous voiding following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Chalaithorn Nantasupha; Kittipat Charoenkwan
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.401

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.