BACKGROUND: Appendiceal neoplasms include tumors ranging from benign-appearing cells with widespread mucin deposits to aggressive poorly differentiated signet ring cell adenocarcinomas. Traditionally, these tumors are treated with cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. For some patients, cytoreductive surgery is not an option, and minimal published data exist in the management and outcome of these patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted to determine the benefit of modern systemic chemotherapy in patients with disseminated appendiceal neoplasm who were not considered optimal candidates for cytoreductive surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted using The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center tumor registry between January 2000 and July 2005. Response was determined by radiographic response and/or overall clinical benefit. RESULTS: Of 186 patients diagnosed with appendiceal neoplasm, 54 (29%) patients considered to be suboptimal surgical candidates received > or =2 cycles of systemic chemotherapy. Thirty (55.6%) patients had a disease control rate noted as a complete response, partial response, or stable disease. After a median follow-up of 24 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were determined to be 7.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4-11) and 56 months (95% CI, 36-not applicable), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic chemotherapy has a role in appendiceal neoplasm patients who are suboptimal candidates for cytoreductive surgery. The intermediate PFS indicates the challenges that exist for appendiceal neoplasm patients in this setting. Prospective randomized trials including systemic chemotherapy are needed to provide further insight into this malignancy, for which no standard exists.
BACKGROUND:Appendiceal neoplasms include tumors ranging from benign-appearing cells with widespread mucin deposits to aggressive poorly differentiated signet ring cell adenocarcinomas. Traditionally, these tumors are treated with cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. For some patients, cytoreductive surgery is not an option, and minimal published data exist in the management and outcome of these patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted to determine the benefit of modern systemic chemotherapy in patients with disseminated appendiceal neoplasm who were not considered optimal candidates for cytoreductive surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted using The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center tumor registry between January 2000 and July 2005. Response was determined by radiographic response and/or overall clinical benefit. RESULTS: Of 186 patients diagnosed with appendiceal neoplasm, 54 (29%) patients considered to be suboptimal surgical candidates received > or =2 cycles of systemic chemotherapy. Thirty (55.6%) patients had a disease control rate noted as a complete response, partial response, or stable disease. After a median follow-up of 24 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were determined to be 7.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4-11) and 56 months (95% CI, 36-not applicable), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic chemotherapy has a role in appendiceal neoplasmpatients who are suboptimal candidates for cytoreductive surgery. The intermediate PFS indicates the challenges that exist for appendiceal neoplasmpatients in this setting. Prospective randomized trials including systemic chemotherapy are needed to provide further insight into this malignancy, for which no standard exists.
Authors: Edward A Levine; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Shadi A Qasem; John Philip; Kathleen A Cummins; Jeff W Chou; Jimmy Ruiz; Ralph D'Agostino; Perry Shen; Lance D Miller Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: P Barrios; F Losa; S Gonzalez-Moreno; A Rojo; A Gómez-Portilla; P Bretcha-Boix; I Ramos; J Torres-Melero; R Salazar; M Benavides; T Massuti; E Aranda Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Edward A Levine; Dan G Blazer; Mickey K Kim; Perry Shen; John H Stewart; Cynthia Guy; David S Hsu Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: C H Lieu; L A Lambert; R A Wolff; C Eng; N Zhang; S Wen; S Rafeeq; M Taggart; K Fournier; R Royal; P Mansfield; M J Overman Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Ryuma Tokunaga; Joanne Xiu; Curtis Johnston; Richard M Goldberg; Philip A Philip; Andreas Seeber; Madiha Naseem; Jae Ho Lo; Hiroyuki Arai; Francesca Battaglin; Alberto Puccini; Martin D Berger; Shivani Soni; Wu Zhang; Jimmy J Hwang; Anthony F Shields; John L Marshall; Hideo Baba; W Michael Korn; Heinz-Josef Lenz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Alvaro Arjona-Sanchez; Francisco Cristobal Muñoz-Casares; Angela Casado-Adam; Juan Manuel Sánchez-Hidalgo; Maria Dolores Ayllon Teran; Rafael Orti-Rodriguez; Ana Cristina Padial-Aguado; Javier Medina-Fernández; Rosa Ortega-Salas; Gema Pulido-Cortijo; Auxiliadora Gómez-España; Sebastián Rufián-Peña Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.352