BACKGROUND: Treatment of peritoneal metastases from appendiceal and colon cancer with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) shows great promise. Although long-term disease-free survival is achieved in some cases with this procedure, many patients have recurrence. Oncologists have treated such recurrences of appendiceal cancer similarly to colorectal carcinoma, which has been largely ineffective. This study uses gene expression analysis of peritoneal metastases to better understand these neoplasms. STUDY DESIGN: From a prospectively maintained database and tissue bank, 41 snap frozen samples of peritoneal metastases (26 appendiceal, 15 colorectal) from patients undergoing HIPEC with complete cytoreduction and more than 3 years of follow-up underwent global gene expression analysis. Distinct phenotypes were identified using unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on differential gene expression. Survival curves restratified by genotype were generated. RESULTS: Three distinct phenotypes were found, 2 consisting of predominantly low grade appendiceal samples (10 of 13 in Cluster 1 and 15 of 20 in Cluster 2) and 1 consisting of predominantly colorectal samples (7 of 8 in Cluster 3). Cluster 1 consisted of patients with good prognosis and Clusters 2 and 3 consisted of patients with poor prognosis (p = 0.006). Signatures predicted survival of low- (Cluster 1) vs high-risk (Cluster 2) appendiceal (p = 0.04) and low-risk appendiceal (Cluster 1) vs colon primary (Cluster 3) (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first use of gene expression profiling for appendiceal cancer, and demonstrates genomic signatures quite distinct from colorectal cancer, confirming their unique biology. Consequently, therapy for appendiceal lesions extrapolated from colonic cancer regimens may be unfounded. These phenotypes may predict outcomes guiding patient management.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of peritoneal metastases from appendiceal and colon cancer with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) shows great promise. Although long-term disease-free survival is achieved in some cases with this procedure, many patients have recurrence. Oncologists have treated such recurrences of appendiceal cancer similarly to colorectal carcinoma, which has been largely ineffective. This study uses gene expression analysis of peritoneal metastases to better understand these neoplasms. STUDY DESIGN: From a prospectively maintained database and tissue bank, 41 snap frozen samples of peritoneal metastases (26 appendiceal, 15 colorectal) from patients undergoing HIPEC with complete cytoreduction and more than 3 years of follow-up underwent global gene expression analysis. Distinct phenotypes were identified using unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on differential gene expression. Survival curves restratified by genotype were generated. RESULTS: Three distinct phenotypes were found, 2 consisting of predominantly low grade appendiceal samples (10 of 13 in Cluster 1 and 15 of 20 in Cluster 2) and 1 consisting of predominantly colorectal samples (7 of 8 in Cluster 3). Cluster 1 consisted of patients with good prognosis and Clusters 2 and 3 consisted of patients with poor prognosis (p = 0.006). Signatures predicted survival of low- (Cluster 1) vs high-risk (Cluster 2) appendiceal (p = 0.04) and low-risk appendiceal (Cluster 1) vs colon primary (Cluster 3) (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first use of gene expression profiling for appendiceal cancer, and demonstrates genomic signatures quite distinct from colorectal cancer, confirming their unique biology. Consequently, therapy for appendiceal lesions extrapolated from colonic cancer regimens may be unfounded. These phenotypes may predict outcomes guiding patient management.
Authors: Rafael A Irizarry; Benjamin M Bolstad; Francois Collin; Leslie M Cope; Bridget Hobbs; Terence P Speed Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: B Sadeghi; C Arvieux; O Glehen; A C Beaujard; M Rivoire; J Baulieux; E Fontaumard; A Brachet; J L Caillot; J L Faure; J Porcheron; J L Peix; Y François; J Vignal; F N Gilly Journal: Cancer Date: 2000-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Robert F Bradley; John H Stewart; Gregory B Russell; Edward A Levine; Kim R Geisinger Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: John H Stewart; Perry Shen; Gregory B Russell; Robert F Bradley; Jonathan C Hundley; Brian L Loggie; Kim R Geisinger; Edward A Levine Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2006-03-14 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Perry Shen; Jason Hawksworth; James Lovato; Brian W Loggie; Kim R Geisinger; Ronald A Fleming; Edward A Levine Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Edward A Levine; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Shadi A Qasem; John Philip; Kathleen A Cummins; Jeff W Chou; Jimmy Ruiz; Ralph D'Agostino; Perry Shen; Lance D Miller Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Jing Su; Guangxu Jin; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Lou Craddock; Perry Shen; Jeff W Chou; Shadi Qasem; Stacey S O'Neill; Kathleen Cummins Perry; Lance D Miller; Edward A Levine Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Andrea Mazzocchi; Hemamylammal Sivakumar; Steven Forsythe; Julio Aleman; Edward A Levine; Aleksander Skardal Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Konstantinos Ioannis Votanopoulos; David Bartlett; Brendan Moran; Choudry M Haroon; Greg Russell; James F Pingpank; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Chandrakumaran Kandiah; Konstantinos Chouliaras; Perry Shen; Edward A Levine Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Paul L Feingold; Nicholas D Klemen; Mei Li M Kwong; Barry Hashimoto; Udo Rudloff Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Katrina Swett; Aaron U Blackham; Chukwuemeka Ihemelandu; Perry Shen; John H Stewart; Edward A Levine Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-03-02 Impact factor: 5.344