Literature DB >> 19904266

Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and prognosis of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

S Tamez1, C Norizoe, K Ochiai, D Takahashi, A Shimojima, Y Tsutsumi, N Yanaihara, T Tanaka, A Okamoto, M Urashima.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, the vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphism FokI was shown to be associated with susceptibility to ovarian cancer. We aimed to examine whether VDR FokI polymorphisms influence the survivals of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).
METHODS: VDR polymorphisms from FokI in 101 patients with EOC were genotyped by sequencing. Overall survival was compared between FokI single nucleotide polymorphism using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank tests and the Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for ages, stages, histology, and existence of residual tumour.
RESULTS: The FokI C/C genotypes were associated with better prognosis compared with the C/T and T/T genotypes (log-rank test: P = 0.008; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.18; 95%CI 0.05-0.61; P = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the VDR polymorphisms from the FokI genotype may be associated with improved prognosis of patients with EOC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19904266      PMCID: PMC2777264          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Recently, a meta-analysis showed that patients with one of single nuclear polymorphisms vitamin D receptor (VDR), the FokI (rs2228570) TT genotype, had a significantly higher risk for developing ovarian cancer as well as prostate, breast, skin, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and colorectal cancer compared with its CC genotype (Raimondi ). Moreover, combined results from four case–control studies showed almost the same results regarding enhanced susceptibility to ovarian cancer (Tworoger ). However, the risk of developing ovarian cancer based on FokI genotype is minor (Lurie ), and study findings are controversial (Clendenen ). Recently, Heist ) showed that the T allele of VDR FokI polymorphisms was associated with significantly worse survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, which is the first report to show a relationship between VDR polymorphisms and prognosis of patients with cancer. Although some articles show an association between FokI polymorphisms and susceptibility to epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), no report has shown a relationship between FokI polymorphisms and survival of patients with EOC. Therefore, we investigated whether VDR FokI polymorphisms influenced the prognosis of patients with EOC.

Materials and methods

Patients

This prospective cohort hospital-based study to detect important gene mutations in ovarian cancer was approved by the Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research of the Jikei Institutional Review Board, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. As post-hoc analysis, we performed to re-examine VDR FokI polymorphisms in this cohort. Between September 1996 and January 2009, approximately 600 patients with EOC took surgery. Of these, approximately 300 had PaclitaxelCarboplatin treatment as a first line chemotherapy. Of these, approximately 250 patients provided informed consent. Of these, approximately 200 samples showed more than 80% of cancer cells. Of these, 125 samples were enriched DNA by laser capture micro-dissection or trimming with needle. Of these, 24 were not selected from this study because DNA specimens were not available. Thus, 101 patients with EOC were included in this study: Clinical information was abstracted from clinical and surgical charts. Postoperative stages were determined by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification (Kikkawa ). Patients were periodically (every 0.5–2 months) examined on an outpatient basis to make sure they had not relapsed.

Samples

In all cases, tumour samples from the primary site, but not metastatic sites, were stored at −80°C after excision. Cancer tissue was divided into two specimens: one for pathological confirmation, in which the sample was composed of more than 80% cancer cells, and the other for DNA extraction. Peripheral blood samples were collected during the preoperative period from 10 of the same patient's group to confirm whether alteration of sequence was due to either genomic polymorphisms or somatic mutations.

Polymorphisms of the VDR gene

DNA was extracted from the fresh frozen tumour and peripheral blood samples using QIAcube (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan) following the manufacturer's protocol. DNA fragments of FokI were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the following primers (forward/reverse): ctccgaaggcactgtgctcaggcct/atggaaacaccttgcttcttctccctc; sequence, ggcctgggccctggggagat; parameters: denaturation at 98°C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles at 98°C for 10 s, annealing at 68°C for 4 min, and the stopping reaction at 16°C. The PCR products were incubated with rAPid alkaline phosphatase (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and Exonuclease I (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) at 37°C for 30 min, then 80°C for 15 min. Using Big Dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Tokyo, Japan), the aliquots were incubated under the following conditions: 96°C for 5 min; 25 cycles at 96°C for 10 s, 50°C for 5 s, and 60°C for 2 min. Treated PCR products were sequenced with the ABI PRISM 3700 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequencing was confirmed with independent duplicate analyses in 20 samples for quality control to find no discrepancy. Genotyping success rate was 69%, although genotyping success rate improved to 100% by repeated measure. Genotyping was performed by ST and CN, who were blinded to clinical information.

Statistical analysis

The analysis of variance and χ2 test were used to evaluate differences in patients' characteristics stratified by VDR genotypes. Overall survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by VDR polymorphisms using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard models were fitted for multivariate analysis using postoperative stages (stages I–IV), histology (endometrioid, clear cell, serous mucinous, mixed mesodermal), residual tumour (none, <2 cm, ⩾2 cm), and ages. Adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 9.1 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients' characteristics

Patients ranged in age from 42–64 years. When classified under FIGO staging, around 53% of the patients had advanced stages of disease (stages III–IV). We confirmed that the polymorphism FokI was common between the tumour and peripheral blood samples obtained from the same 10 patients, suggesting genomic alterations, but not somatic mutations. Genotype frequencies of the VDR polymorphisms based on tumour samples were as follows: FokI C/C, 35%; C/T, 55%; and TT, 10%. Patients' characteristics were not significantly different among FokI genotypes (Table 1).
Table 1

Patients' characteristics stratified by FokI genotype

Variable number (%) Total 101 Fok I C/C 35 (35) Fok I C/T 56 (55) Fok I T/T 10 (10) P value
Age, year (mean±s.d.)53.1±10.652.0±8.854.6±12.148.1±5.60.18a
      
Histological type: Number (%) 0.54b
 Endometrioid219 (43)11 (52)1 (5) 
 Clear cell3510 (29)22 (63)3 (9) 
 Serous3812 (32)20 (53)6 (16) 
 Mucinous64 (67)2 (33)0 
 Mixed mesodermal1010 
      
FIGO staging 0.36b
 I (A, B, C)4115 (36)22 (54)4 (10) 
 II (A, B, C)61 (17)3 (50)2 (33) 
 III (A, B, C)4416 (36)26 (59)2 (5) 
 IV103 (30)5 (50)2 (20) 
      
Residual tumour c 0.43b
 None6925 (36)36 (52)8 (12) 
 <2 cm123 (25)7 (58)2 (17) 
 ⩾2 cm207 (35)13 (65)0 (0) 

Abbreviation: FIGO=Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

ANOVA.

χ2 test.

Existence and size of residual tumour after surgery.

FokI polymorphisms and overall survival

All 101 patients were followed for a median of 85 months; 45 (45%) relapsed and 28 (28%) died of EOC. Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed that the FokI C/C genotype was associated with a better prognosis. At 30 months after surgery, 90% of patients with FokI C/C genotype were still alive; in contrast, only 66% of patients with C/T and T/T were alive (Figure 1A). When cancer stage was restricted to stage I, there was no significant difference between C/C and C/T plus T/T genotypes (Figure 1B). When cancer stages were restricted to II–IV, 84% of patients with FokI C/C were still alive; in contrast, only 50% of patients with C/T and T/T were still alive (Figure 1C).
Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival by (A) stages I–IV, (B) stage I, (C) stages II–IV.

Cox proportional hazard models with multivariate adjustment

Cox proportional hazard models were computed to determine the significance of FokI with adjustment for postoperative stages, histology, existence of residual tumour and ages (Table 2). Without multivariate analysis, patients with FokI C/C genotype, stage I disease, or without residual tumour after surgery did show a significantly reduced crude hazard ratio. Even with multivariate analysis, patients with the FokI C/C genotype showed significantly better prognostic markers: AHR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.61; P=0.006.
Table 2

Cox proportional hazard models

  Single-variate analyses
Multivariate analysis
Variable Crude HR 95% CI P value AHR 95% CI P value
FokI C/C: 660.260.09–0.760.0140.180.05–0.610.006
FokI C/T or T/T: 35Reference  Reference  
Stage I: 410.050.005–0.420.0060.020.002–0.280.004
Stage II: 60.780.14–4.320.780.760.89–6.540.81
Stage III: 441.320.45–3.860.621.090.33–3.610.89
Stage IV: 10Reference  Reference  
       
Histology
 Endometrioid: 210.170.02–1.710.130.050.03–0.950.04
 Clear Cell: 350.510.06–4.040.520.530.05–5.160.58
 Serous: 380.600.08–4.700.630.080.07–0.880.04
 Mucinous: 6Reference  Reference  
 Mixed mesodermal: 10.270.02–4.310.350.090.04–2.100.13
       
Residual tumour
 None: 69Reference  Reference  
 <2 cm: 125.671.84–17.430.0031.730.39–7.690.47
 ⩾2 cm: 2011.194.36–28.72<0.0014.931.31–18.530.02
 Age1.061.01–1.100.0051.010.98–1.050.49

Abbreviations: HR=hazard ratio; CI=confidence interval; AHR=adjusted hazard ratio.

Adjusted for postoperative stages, postoperative chemotherapy, histology (endometrioid, clear cell, serous, mucinous, mixed mesodermal), and residual tumour (none, <2 cm, ⩾2 cm).

Discussion

In this study, we found that the VDR FokI C/C genotype was associated with a better overall survival rate in patients with EOC than a combination of FokI C/T and FokI T/T, even after adjustment for cancer stage, histology, existence of residual tumour and age. Arai ) showed that compared with the FokI T/T genotype, FokI C/C had 1.7-fold greater function of vitamin D-dependent transcriptional activation of a reporter construct under the control of a vitamin D response element in transfected HeLa cells. Similarly, Colin ) showed a significantly lower (50%) effective dose of 1,25-(OH)2D3 in the FokI C/C genotype than in FokI C/T genotype. By switching from ATG (FokI T) to ACG (FokI C) polymorphism, the first potential start site moves to the 3′ direction, resulting in proteins that are three amino acids shorter and more functional (Gross ). Thus, patients with FokI C/C may react more to vitamin D, resulting in a higher survival rate. Higher serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) can be associated with better outcome in EOC, as reported in early stages of breast, colon, and lung cancer (Zhou ; Ng ; Goodwin ). Moreover, ecological studies showed that solar ultraviolet B irradiance was inversely associated with incidence rates of ovarian cancer (Garland ) as well as survival of patients with ovarian cancer (Grant, 2006), implying a link between ultraviolet B irradiance, vitamin D, and ovarian cancer both in susceptibility and survival. A plausible explanation for why increased sun exposure and higher circulating levels of vitamin D are associated with a decreased risk of deadly cancers is as follows (Holick, 2007). Epithelial cells convert the primary circulating form of vitamin D, (25(OH)D), to its active form, 1,25-dihydoroxyvitamin D, inside the cells, which bind VDR in their nucleus to regulate a variety of genes. These genes help prevent malignant transformation by keeping cellular proliferation and differentiation within normal ranges. In turn, if a cell becomes malignant, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D can induce apoptosis and prevent angiogenesis, thereby reducing the potential for the malignant cell to survive. Vitamin D3 derivative was shown to induce apoptosis of ovarian cells but not of primary fibroblasts and to suppress ovarian tumour growth in a mice model (Zhang ; Lange ). There are several limitations to our study. Overall, the sample size is not large enough to detect significant differences in patients stratified by histology or stages. We did not use restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and directly sequenced PCR fragments to avoid misclassification as much as possible and to compensate for the disadvantage of the small sample size. Moreover, cases were not consecutively selected, which may cause selection bias. This study was performed as post-hoc analysis of prospective cohort hospital-based study to detect important gene mutations in ovarian cancer. Thus, serum 25(OH)D was not measured, vitamin D and its synergistic effect with VDR polymorphism were not evaluated. There are other kinds of VDR polymorphisms, such as Cdx-2 and BsmI, related to disease risks that have been reported in previous articles, and we need to expand our range of analysis in the future. In conclusion, there were significant associations between better prognosis of patients with EOC and the FokI C/C genotype.
  17 in total

Review 1.  Advances in treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Fumitaka Kikkawa; Akihiro Nawa; Kazuhiko Ino; Kiyosumi Shibata; Hiroaki Kajiyama; Seiji Nomura
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.131

2.  A vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism in the translation initiation codon: effect on protein activity and relation to bone mineral density in Japanese women.

Authors:  H Arai; K Miyamoto; Y Taketani; H Yamamoto; Y Iemori; K Morita; T Tonai; T Nishisho; S Mori; E Takeda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Consequences of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms for growth inhibition of cultured human peripheral blood mononuclear cells by 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3.

Authors:  E M Colin; A E Weel; A G Uitterlinden; C J Buurman; J C Birkenhäger; H A Pols; J P van Leeuwen
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  Growth suppression of ovarian cancer xenografts in nude mice by vitamin D analogue EB1089.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zhang; Feng Jiang; Pengfei Li; Chunrong Li; Qiuping Ma; Santo V Nicosia; Wenlong Bai
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  The presence of a polymorphism at the translation initiation site of the vitamin D receptor gene is associated with low bone mineral density in postmenopausal Mexican-American women.

Authors:  C Gross; T R Eccleshall; P J Malloy; M L Villa; R Marcus; D Feldman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin d levels and survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kimmie Ng; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Kana Wu; Diane Feskanich; Bruce W Hollis; Edward L Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Review and meta-analysis on vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and cancer risk.

Authors:  Sara Raimondi; Harriet Johansson; Patrick Maisonneuve; Sara Gandini
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Prognostic effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Pamela J Goodwin; Marguerite Ennis; Kathleen I Pritchard; Jarley Koo; Nicky Hood
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D, VDR polymorphisms, and survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca Suk Heist; Wei Zhou; Zhaoxi Wang; Geoffrey Liu; Donna Neuberg; Li Su; Kofi Asomaning; Bruce W Hollis; Thomas J Lynch; John C Wain; Edward Giovannucci; David C Christiani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Effect of a vitamin D(3) derivative (B3CD) with postulated anti-cancer activity in an ovarian cancer animal model.

Authors:  Thilo S Lange; Ashley R Stuckey; Katina Robison; Kyu Kwang Kim; Rakesh K Singh; Christina A Raker; Laurent Brard
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.850

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic role of vitamin d status and efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Consuelo Buttigliero; Chiara Monagheddu; Paola Petroni; Andrea Saini; Luigi Dogliotti; Giovannino Ciccone; Alfredo Berruti
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-08-11

2.  Associations between genetic variants in vitamin D metabolism and asthma characteristics in young African Americans: a pilot study.

Authors:  Dinesh K Pillai; Sabah F Iqbal; Angela S Benton; Jennifer Lerner; Andrew Wiles; Matthew Foerster; Tugba Ozedirne; Henry P Holbrook; Perry W Payne; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Stephen J Teach; Robert J Freishtat
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Vitamin D receptor gene variants and clinical outcomes after androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jiunn-Bey Pao; Ying-Pi Yang; Chun-Nung Huang; Shu-Pin Huang; Tzyh-Chyuan Hour; Ta-Yuan Chang; Yu-Hsuan Lan; Te-Ling Lu; Hong-Zin Lee; Shin-Hun Juang; Chao-Yuan Huang; Bo-Ying Bao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Vitamin D receptor gene BsmI and FokI polymorphisms in relation to ovarian cancer risk in the Polish population.

Authors:  Adrianna Mostowska; Stefan Sajdak; Piotr Pawlik; Margarita Lianeri; Pawel P Jagodzinski
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-01-15

5.  Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma: a population-based study.

Authors:  Irene Orlow; Anne S Reiner; Nancy E Thomas; Pampa Roy; Peter A Kanetsky; Li Luo; Susan Paine; Bruce K Armstrong; Anne Kricker; Loraine D Marrett; Stefano Rosso; Roberto Zanetti; Stephen B Gruber; Hoda Anton-Culver; Richard P Gallagher; Terence Dwyer; Klaus Busam; Colin B Begg; Marianne Berwick
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Plasma Vitamin D Levels And Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms Are Associated with Survival of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yao Liu; Wei Chen; Zhi-Bin Hu; Lin Xu; Yong-Qian Shu; Shi-Yang Pan; Jun-Cheng Dai; Guang-Fu Jin; Hong-Xia Ma; Hong-Bing Shen
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Polymorphisms in the vitamin D Receptor (VDR) and the risk of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanling Liu; Chenglin Li; Peizhan Chen; Xiaoguang Li; Mian Li; He Guo; Jingquan Li; Ruiai Chu; Hui Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  In Silico discovery of transcription factors as potential diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mandeep Kaur; Cameron R MacPherson; Sebastian Schmeier; Kothandaraman Narasimhan; Mahesh Choolani; Vladimir B Bajic
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2011-09-19

9.  Prediagnostic 25-hydroxyvitamin D, VDR and CASR polymorphisms, and survival in patients with colorectal cancer in western European ppulations.

Authors:  Veronika Fedirko; Elio Riboli; Anne Tjønneland; Pietro Ferrari; Anja Olsen; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Fränzel J B van Duijnhoven; Teresa Norat; Eugène H J M Jansen; Christina C Dahm; Kim Overvad; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Antoine Racine; Annekatrin Lukanova; Birgit Teucher; Heiner Boeing; Krasimira Aleksandrova; Antonia Trichopoulou; Vassiliki Benetou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Sara Grioni; Paolo Vineis; Salvatore Panico; Domenico Palli; Rosario Tumino; Peter D Siersema; Petra H Peeters; Guri Skeie; Magritt Brustad; Maria-Dolores Chirlaque; Aurelio Barricarte; Jose Ramón Quirós; Maria José Sánchez; Miren Dorronsoro; Catalina Bonet; Richard Palmqvist; Göran Hallmans; Timothy J Key; Francesca Crowe; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nick Wareham; Isabelle Romieu; James McKay; Petra A Wark; Dora Romaguera; Mazda Jenab
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Vitamin d: are we ready to supplement for breast cancer prevention and treatment?

Authors:  Katherine D Crew
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.