PURPOSE: Higher plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) (25(OH)D) levels are associated with a decreased incidence of colorectal cancer, but the influence of plasma 25(OH)D on the outcome of patients with established colorectal cancer is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively examined the association between prediagnosis 25(OH)D levels and mortality among 304 participants in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS) who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer from 1991 to 2002. Participants diagnosed within 2 years of blood collection were excluded. Patients were observed until death, June 2005 (NHS), or January 2005 (HPFS), whichever came first. The primary end point was overall mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for other risk factors for cancer survival. RESULTS: Higher plasma 25(OH)D levels were associated with a significant reduction in overall mortality (P for trend = .02). Compared with the lowest quartile, participants in the highest quartile had an adjusted HR of 0.52 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.94) for overall mortality. A trend toward improved colorectal cancer-specific mortality was also seen (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.19). The results remained unchanged after excluding patients diagnosed within 5 years of blood collection (P for trend = .04); the multivariate HR for overall mortality comparing extreme quartiles was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.19 to 1.09). CONCLUSION: Among patients with colorectal cancer, higher prediagnosis plasma 25(OH)D levels were associated with a significant improvement in overall survival. Further study of the vitamin D pathway and its influence on colorectal carcinogenesis and cancer progression is warranted.
PURPOSE: Higher plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) (25(OH)D) levels are associated with a decreased incidence of colorectal cancer, but the influence of plasma 25(OH)D on the outcome of patients with established colorectal cancer is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively examined the association between prediagnosis 25(OH)D levels and mortality among 304 participants in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS) who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer from 1991 to 2002. Participants diagnosed within 2 years of blood collection were excluded. Patients were observed until death, June 2005 (NHS), or January 2005 (HPFS), whichever came first. The primary end point was overall mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for other risk factors for cancer survival. RESULTS: Higher plasma 25(OH)D levels were associated with a significant reduction in overall mortality (P for trend = .02). Compared with the lowest quartile, participants in the highest quartile had an adjusted HR of 0.52 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.94) for overall mortality. A trend toward improved colorectal cancer-specific mortality was also seen (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.19). The results remained unchanged after excluding patients diagnosed within 5 years of blood collection (P for trend = .04); the multivariate HR for overall mortality comparing extreme quartiles was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.19 to 1.09). CONCLUSION: Among patients with colorectal cancer, higher prediagnosis plasma 25(OH)D levels were associated with a significant improvement in overall survival. Further study of the vitamin D pathway and its influence on colorectal carcinogenesis and cancer progression is warranted.
Authors: François Meyer; Geoffrey Liu; Pierre Douville; Elodie Samson; Wei Xu; Araba Adjei; Isabelle Bairati Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Elizabeth A Yetley; Christine M Pfeiffer; Rosemary L Schleicher; Karen W Phinney; David A Lacher; Sylvia Christakos; John H Eckfeldt; James C Fleet; George Howard; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Siu L Hui; Gary L Lensmeyer; Joseph Massaro; Munro Peacock; Bernard Rosner; Donald Wiebe; Regan L Bailey; Paul M Coates; Anne C Looker; Christopher Sempos; Clifford L Johnson; Mary Frances Picciano Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Kimmie Ng; Daniel J Sargent; Richard M Goldberg; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Erin M Green; Henry C Pitot; Bruce W Hollis; Michael N Pollak; Charles S Fuchs Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Johanna E Torfadottir; Thor Aspelund; Unnur A Valdimarsdottir; Mary Frances Cotch; Laufey Tryggvadottir; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Hans-Olov Adami; Lorelei A Mucci; Edward L Giovannucci; Meir J Stampfer; Laufey Steingrimsdottir Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Stacey Meeker; Audrey Seamons; Jisun Paik; Piper M Treuting; Thea Brabb; William M Grady; Lillian Maggio-Price Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Kimmie Ng; Chen Yuan; Kaori Sato; Bruce W Hollis; Sui Zhang; Donna Niedzwiecki; Fang-Shu Ou; I-Wen Chang; Bert H O'Neil; Federico Innocenti; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Charles D Blanke; Richard M Goldberg; Alan P Venook; Robert J Mayer; Charles S Fuchs Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 12.531