Mark B Faries1, Eddy C Hsueh, Xing Ye, Mary Hoban, Donald L Morton. 1. Sonya Valley Ghidossi Vaccine Laboratory of the Roy E. Coats Research Laboratories of the John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA. fariesm@jwci.org
Abstract
PURPOSE: The availability of a variety of immune response modifiers creates an opportunity for improved efficacy of immunotherapy, but it also leads to uncertainty in how to combine agents and how to assess those combinations. We sought to assess the effect of the addition of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to vaccination with a melanoma vaccine. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Ninety-seven patients with resected melanoma (stage II-IV) were enrolled, stratified by stage, and randomized to receive a cellular melanoma vaccine with or without GM-CSF. The primary endpoint was delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response to melanoma cells. Antibody responses, peripheral leukocyte counts, and survival were also examined. RESULTS: The GM-CSF arm showed enhanced antibody responses with an increase in IgM titer against the TA90 antigen and increased TA90 immune complexes. This arm also had diminished antimelanoma cell delayed-type hypersensitivity response. Peripheral blood leukocyte profiles showed increases in eosinophils and basophils with decreased monocytes in the GM-CSF arm. These immune changes were accompanied by an increase in early melanoma deaths and a trend toward worse survival with GM-CSF. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that GM-CSF is not helpful as an immune adjuvant in this dose and schedule and raise concern that it may be harmful. Based on the discordant findings of an immune endpoint and clinical outcome, the use of such surrogate endpoints in selecting treatments for further evaluation must be done with a great deal of caution.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The availability of a variety of immune response modifiers creates an opportunity for improved efficacy of immunotherapy, but it also leads to uncertainty in how to combine agents and how to assess those combinations. We sought to assess the effect of the addition of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to vaccination with a melanoma vaccine. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Ninety-seven patients with resected melanoma (stage II-IV) were enrolled, stratified by stage, and randomized to receive a cellular melanoma vaccine with or without GM-CSF. The primary endpoint was delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response to melanoma cells. Antibody responses, peripheral leukocyte counts, and survival were also examined. RESULTS: The GM-CSF arm showed enhanced antibody responses with an increase in IgM titer against the TA90 antigen and increased TA90 immune complexes. This arm also had diminished antimelanoma cell delayed-type hypersensitivity response. Peripheral blood leukocyte profiles showed increases in eosinophils and basophils with decreased monocytes in the GM-CSF arm. These immune changes were accompanied by an increase in early melanoma deaths and a trend toward worse survival with GM-CSF. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that GM-CSF is not helpful as an immune adjuvant in this dose and schedule and raise concern that it may be harmful. Based on the discordant findings of an immune endpoint and clinical outcome, the use of such surrogate endpoints in selecting treatments for further evaluation must be done with a great deal of caution.
Authors: E Jäger; M Ringhoffer; H P Dienes; M Arand; J Karbach; D Jäger; C Ilsemann; M Hagedorn; F Oesch; A Knuth Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 1996-07-03 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: John L Marshall; James L Gulley; Philip M Arlen; Patricia K Beetham; Kwong-Yok Tsang; Rebecca Slack; James W Hodge; Sandra Doren; Douglas W Grosenbach; Jimmy Hwang; Evelyn Fox; Lauretta Odogwu; Susie Park; Dennis Panicali; Jeffrey Schlom Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-12-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Omid Hamid; Jolie C Solomon; Ronald Scotland; Marile Garcia; Shirley Sian; Wei Ye; Susan L Groshen; Jeff S Weber Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-01-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: S J Simmons; B A Tjoa; M Rogers; A Elgamal; G M Kenny; H Ragde; M J Troychak; A L Boynton; G P Murphy Journal: Prostate Date: 1999-06-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Matthew P Morrow; Jian Yan; Panyupa Pankhong; Bernadette Ferraro; Mark G Lewis; Amir S Khan; Niranjan Y Sardesai; David B Weiner Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2010-08-04
Authors: Sarah E Church; Shawn M Jensen; Christopher G Twitty; Keith Bahjat; Hong-Ming Hu; Walter J Urba; Bernard A Fox Journal: Cancer J Date: 2011 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.360
Authors: Sergiusz Markowicz; Zbigniew I Nowecki; Piotr Rutkowski; Andrzej W Lipkowski; Marzena Biernacka; Anna Jakubowska-Mucka; Tomasz Switaj; Aleksandra Misicka; Henryk Skurzak; Hanna Polowniak-Pracka; Jan Walewski Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Craig L Slingluff; Sandra Lee; Fengmin Zhao; Kimberly A Chianese-Bullock; Walter C Olson; Lisa H Butterfield; Theresa L Whiteside; Philip D Leming; John M Kirkwood Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 12.531