Literature DB >> 15613691

Phase I study of sequential vaccinations with fowlpox-CEA(6D)-TRICOM alone and sequentially with vaccinia-CEA(6D)-TRICOM, with and without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, in patients with carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing carcinomas.

John L Marshall1, James L Gulley, Philip M Arlen, Patricia K Beetham, Kwong-Yok Tsang, Rebecca Slack, James W Hodge, Sandra Doren, Douglas W Grosenbach, Jimmy Hwang, Evelyn Fox, Lauretta Odogwu, Susie Park, Dennis Panicali, Jeffrey Schlom.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our previous clinical experience with vaccinia and replication-defective avipox recombinant carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) vaccines has demonstrated safety and clinical activity with a correlation between CEA-specific immune response and survival. Preclinical evidence demonstrated that the addition of the transgenes for three T-cell costimulatory molecules (B7-1, ICAM-1, LFA-3, designated TRICOM) results in a significant improvement in antigen-specific T-cell responses and antitumor activity. We describe here the first trial in humans of the CEA-TRICOM vaccines (also including an enhancer agonist epitope within the CEA gene). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with advanced CEA-expressing cancers were accrued to eight cohorts that involved vaccinations with the following: replication-defective fowlpox recombinant (rF)-CEA(6D)-TRICOM; primary vaccination with recombinant vaccinia (rV)-CEA(6D)-TRICOM plus rF-CEA(6D)-TRICOM booster vaccinations; and rV-CEA(6D)-TRICOM and then rF-CEA(6D)-TRICOM, plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) with vaccines, or with divided doses of vaccine with GM-CSF. Vaccines were administered every 28 days for six doses and then once every 3 months. Reverting to treatments every 28 days was allowed if patients progressed on the 3-month schedule.
RESULTS: In this phase I study, no significant toxicity was observed. Twenty-three patients (40%) had stable disease for at least 4 months, with 14 of these patients having prolonged stable disease (> 6 months). Eleven patients had decreasing or stable serum CEA, and one patient had a pathologic complete response. Enhanced CEA-specific T-cell responses were observed in the majority of patients tested.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the CEA-TRICOM vaccines are safe and can generate significant CEA-specific immune responses, and they seem to have clinical benefit in some patients with advanced cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15613691     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  92 in total

1.  Immune response after photodynamic therapy increases anti-cancer and anti-bacterial effects.

Authors:  Eleonora Reginato; Peter Wolf; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  World J Immunol       Date:  2014-03-27

2.  Off-the-shelf adenoviral-mediated immunotherapy via bicistronic expression of tumor antigen and iMyD88/CD40 adjuvant.

Authors:  Jan Ole Kemnade; Mamatha Seethammagari; Priya Narayanan; Jonathan M Levitt; Alison A McCormick; David M Spencer
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 3.  Therapeutic cancer vaccines: are we there yet?

Authors:  Christopher A Klebanoff; Nicolas Acquavella; Zhiya Yu; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 4.  Viral vector-based therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Cecilia Larocca; Jeffrey Schlom
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 5.  Exploiting the curative potential of adoptive T-cell therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Christian S Hinrichs; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

6.  Phase I trial of a recombinant yeast-CEA vaccine (GI-6207) in adults with metastatic CEA-expressing carcinoma.

Authors:  Marijo Bilusic; Christopher R Heery; Philip M Arlen; Myrna Rauckhorst; David Apelian; Kwong Y Tsang; Jo A Tucker; Caroline Jochems; Jeffrey Schlom; James L Gulley; Ravi A Madan
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 7.  Immunotherapeutic strategies to target prognostic and predictive markers of cancer.

Authors:  Michael S Magee; Adam E Snook; Glen P Marszalowicz; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 8.  The emerging role of immunotherapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  David Lynch; Adrian Murphy
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-08

9.  Immunotherapy updates in pancreatic cancer: are we there yet?

Authors:  Krishna Soujanya Gunturu; Gabriela R Rossi; Muhammad Wasif Saif
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 10.  Immune Therapy in GI Malignancies: A Review.

Authors:  Judy Wang; Kim A Reiss; Rina Khatri; Elizabeth Jaffee; Dan Laheru
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.