BACKGROUND: A prognostic index based on widely available clinical and laboratory features was recently proposed to predict survival in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We assessed the utility of this index for predicting time to first treatment in early chronic lymphocytic leukemia. DESIGN AND METHODS: An observational database of the GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto), which included 310 patients with newly diagnosed Binet stage A chronic lymphocytic leukemia who were observed at different primary hematology centers during the period 1991 - 2000, was used for the purpose of this study. RESULTS: The new prognostic index enabled Binet stage A patients to be divided into two subgroups that differed with respect to time to first treatment (P=0.003). The original prognostic index was derived from a database that included cases observed at a reference academic center; these patients were younger (P<0.0001) and had more advanced disease (P<0.0001) than those in the current investigation, which studied community-based patients whose data were recorded at presentation. With this in mind, we used an optimal cut-off search to determine how best to split patients with Binet stage A disease into different prognostic groups. According to the recursive partitioning (RPART) model, a classification tree was built that identified three subsets of patients who scores were 0-2 (low risk), 3-4 (intermediate risk) and 5-7 (high risk). The probability of remaining free from therapy at 5 years was 100% in the low risk group, 81.2% in the intermediate risk group and 61.3% in the high risk group (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm the utility of a new prognostic index for predicting time to first treatment in a large sample series of community-based patients with early stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia at presentation. Our effort to develop a revised scoring method meets the need to separate Binet stage A patients into different prognostic groups in order to devise individualized and tailored follow-up during the treatment-free period.
BACKGROUND: A prognostic index based on widely available clinical and laboratory features was recently proposed to predict survival in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We assessed the utility of this index for predicting time to first treatment in early chronic lymphocytic leukemia. DESIGN AND METHODS: An observational database of the GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto), which included 310 patients with newly diagnosed Binet stage A chronic lymphocytic leukemia who were observed at different primary hematology centers during the period 1991 - 2000, was used for the purpose of this study. RESULTS: The new prognostic index enabled Binet stage A patients to be divided into two subgroups that differed with respect to time to first treatment (P=0.003). The original prognostic index was derived from a database that included cases observed at a reference academic center; these patients were younger (P<0.0001) and had more advanced disease (P<0.0001) than those in the current investigation, which studied community-based patients whose data were recorded at presentation. With this in mind, we used an optimal cut-off search to determine how best to split patients with Binet stage A disease into different prognostic groups. According to the recursive partitioning (RPART) model, a classification tree was built that identified three subsets of patients who scores were 0-2 (low risk), 3-4 (intermediate risk) and 5-7 (high risk). The probability of remaining free from therapy at 5 years was 100% in the low risk group, 81.2% in the intermediate risk group and 61.3% in the high risk group (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm the utility of a new prognostic index for predicting time to first treatment in a large sample series of community-based patients with early stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia at presentation. Our effort to develop a revised scoring method meets the need to separate Binet stage A patients into different prognostic groups in order to devise individualized and tailored follow-up during the treatment-free period.
Authors: Terry J Hamblin; Jenny A Orchard; Rachel E Ibbotson; Zadie Davis; Peter W Thomas; Freda K Stevenson; David G Oscier Journal: Blood Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Laura Z Rassenti; Lang Huynh; Tracy L Toy; Liguang Chen; Michael J Keating; John G Gribben; Donna S Neuberg; Ian W Flinn; Kanti R Rai; John C Byrd; Neil E Kay; Andrew Greaves; Arthur Weiss; Thomas J Kipps Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-08-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H Döhner; S Stilgenbauer; A Benner; E Leupolt; A Kröber; L Bullinger; K Döhner; M Bentz; P Lichter Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-12-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R N Damle; T Wasil; F Fais; F Ghiotto; A Valetto; S L Allen; A Buchbinder; D Budman; K Dittmar; J Kolitz; S M Lichtman; P Schulman; V P Vinciguerra; K R Rai; M Ferrarini; N Chiorazzi Journal: Blood Date: 1999-09-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Philippe Solal-Céligny; Pascal Roy; Philippe Colombat; Josephine White; Jim O Armitage; Reyes Arranz-Saez; Wing Y Au; Monica Bellei; Pauline Brice; Dolores Caballero; Bertrand Coiffier; Eulogio Conde-Garcia; Chantal Doyen; Massimo Federico; Richard I Fisher; Javier F Garcia-Conde; Cesare Guglielmi; Anton Hagenbeek; Corinne Haïoun; Michael LeBlanc; Andrew T Lister; Armando Lopez-Guillermo; Peter McLaughlin; Noël Milpied; Pierre Morel; Nicolas Mounier; Stephen J Proctor; Ama Rohatiner; Paul Smith; Pierre Soubeyran; Hervé Tilly; Umberto Vitolo; Pier-Luigi Zinzani; Emanuele Zucca; Emili Montserrat Journal: Blood Date: 2004-05-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: J L Binet; A Auquier; G Dighiero; C Chastang; H Piguet; J Goasguen; G Vaugier; G Potron; P Colona; F Oberling; M Thomas; G Tchernia; C Jacquillat; P Boivin; C Lesty; M T Duault; M Monconduit; S Belabbes; F Gremy Journal: Cancer Date: 1981-07-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: William G Wierda; Susan O'Brien; Xuemei Wang; Stefan Faderl; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Kim-Anh Do; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Jorge Cortes; Deborah Thomas; Charles A Koller; Jan A Burger; Susan Lerner; Ellen Schlette; Lynne Abruzzo; Hagop M Kantarjian; Michael J Keating Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew D Zelenetz; Leo I Gordon; William G Wierda; Jeremy S Abramson; Ranjana H Advani; C Babis Andreadis; Nancy Bartlett; John C Byrd; Myron S Czuczman; Luis E Fayad; Richard I Fisher; Martha J Glenn; Thomas M Habermann; Nancy Lee Harris; Richard T Hoppe; Steven M Horwitz; Christopher R Kelsey; Youn H Kim; Susan Krivacic; Ann S LaCasce; Auayporn Nademanee; Pierluigi Porcu; Oliver Press; Rachel Rabinovitch; Nishitha Reddy; Erin Reid; Ayman A Saad; Lubomir Sokol; Lode J Swinnen; Christina Tsien; Julie M Vose; Lynn Wilson; Joachim Yahalom; Nadeem Zafar; Mary Dwyer; Hema Sundar Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Katarzyna Skórka; Michał Chojnacki; Marta Masternak; Agnieszka Karczmarczyk; Edyta Subocz; Ewa Wawrzyniak; Krzysztof Giannopoulos Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 3.989
Authors: Pietro Bulian; Davide Rossi; Francesco Forconi; Giovanni Del Poeta; Francesco Bertoni; Emanuele Zucca; Marco Montillo; Gabriele Pozzato; Giovanni D'Arena; Dimitar G Efremov; Roberto Marasca; Francesco Lauria; Gianluca Gaidano; Valter Gattei; Luca Laurenti Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2012-01-30 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Nina Kreuzberger; Johanna Aag Damen; Marialena Trivella; Lise J Estcourt; Angela Aldin; Lisa Umlauff; Maria Dla Vazquez-Montes; Robert Wolff; Karel Gm Moons; Ina Monsef; Farid Foroutan; Karl-Anton Kreuzer; Nicole Skoetz Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-07-31