Robert Ewart1, Harald Lausen, Norman Millian. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA. rewart@siumed.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: We wanted to investigate the frequency of undisclosed changes in the outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between trial registration and publication. METHODS: Using a retrospective, nonrandom, cross-sectional study design, we investigated RCTs published in consecutive issues of 5 major medical journals during a 6-month period and their associated trials registry entries. Articles were excluded if they did not have an available trial registry entry, did not have analyzable outcomes, or were secondary publications. The primary outcome was the proportion of publications in which the primary outcome of the trial was, without disclosure, changed between that recorded in the trial registry and that reported in the final publication. The secondary outcome was the proportion of publications in which the secondary outcome was changed without disclosure. RESULTS: We reviewed 158 reports of RCTs and included 110 in the analysis. In 34 (31%), a primary outcome had been changed, and in 77 (70%), a secondary outcome had been changed. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial and important undisclosed changes made to the outcomes of published RCTs between trial registration and publication. This finding has important implications for the interpretation of trial results. Disclosure and discussion of changes would improve transparency in the performance and reporting of trials.
PURPOSE: We wanted to investigate the frequency of undisclosed changes in the outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between trial registration and publication. METHODS: Using a retrospective, nonrandom, cross-sectional study design, we investigated RCTs published in consecutive issues of 5 major medical journals during a 6-month period and their associated trials registry entries. Articles were excluded if they did not have an available trial registry entry, did not have analyzable outcomes, or were secondary publications. The primary outcome was the proportion of publications in which the primary outcome of the trial was, without disclosure, changed between that recorded in the trial registry and that reported in the final publication. The secondary outcome was the proportion of publications in which the secondary outcome was changed without disclosure. RESULTS: We reviewed 158 reports of RCTs and included 110 in the analysis. In 34 (31%), a primary outcome had been changed, and in 77 (70%), a secondary outcome had been changed. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial and important undisclosed changes made to the outcomes of published RCTs between trial registration and publication. This finding has important implications for the interpretation of trial results. Disclosure and discussion of changes would improve transparency in the performance and reporting of trials.
Authors: James B Bussel; David J Kuter; James N George; Robert McMillan; Louis M Aledort; George T Conklin; Alan E Lichtin; Roger M Lyons; Jorge Nieva; Jeffrey S Wasser; Israel Wiznitzer; Reggie Kelly; Chien-Feng Chen; Janet L Nichol Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-10-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Steven A Kaplan; Claus G Roehrborn; Eric S Rovner; Martin Carlsson; Tamara Bavendam; Zhonghong Guan Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A M James Shapiro; Camillo Ricordi; Bernhard J Hering; Hugh Auchincloss; Robert Lindblad; R Paul Robertson; Antonio Secchi; Mathias D Brendel; Thierry Berney; Daniel C Brennan; Enrico Cagliero; Rodolfo Alejandro; Edmond A Ryan; Barbara DiMercurio; Philippe Morel; Kenneth S Polonsky; Jo-Anna Reems; Reinhard G Bretzel; Federico Bertuzzi; Tatiana Froud; Raja Kandaswamy; David E R Sutherland; George Eisenbarth; Miriam Segal; Jutta Preiksaitis; Gregory S Korbutt; Franca B Barton; Lisa Viviano; Vicki Seyfert-Margolis; Jeffrey Bluestone; Jonathan R T Lakey Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-09-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Miriam K Laufer; Phillip C Thesing; Nicole D Eddington; Rhoda Masonga; Fraction K Dzinjalamala; Shannon L Takala; Terrie E Taylor; Christopher V Plowe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-11-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel M Hartung; Deborah A Zarin; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Marian McDonagh; Robin Paynter; Mark Helfand Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Kerry Dwan; Douglas G Altman; Lynne Cresswell; Michaela Blundell; Carrol L Gamble; Paula R Williamson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-01-19
Authors: Isabeau van Beurden; Megan J van de Beek; Jan A A van Heteren; Adriana L Smit; Inge Stegeman Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 4.003