Literature DB >> 19900561

Changes in fMRI magnitude data and phase data observed in block-design and event-related tasks.

Sunil Kumar Arja1, Zhaomei Feng, Zikuan Chen, Arvind Caprihan, Kent A Kiehl, Tülay Adali, Vince D Calhoun.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data are acquired as a complex image pair including magnitude and phase information. The vast majority of fMRI experiments do not attempt to take advantage of the time varying phase information. The phase of the MRI signal is related to the local magnetic field changes, suggesting it may contain useful information about the source of hemodynamic activity. Analysis of phase data acquired from different fMRI experiments has shown the presence of activity in response to various stimuli. However, there have been no studies that have examined phase data in a larger group of subjects for multiple types of fMRI tasks nor have studies examined phase changes due to event-related stimuli. In this paper, we evaluate the correspondence between the magnitude and phase changes at a group level in a block-design motor tapping task and in an event-related auditory oddball task. The results for both block-design and event-related tasks indicate the presence of task-related information in the phase data with phase-only and magnitude-only approaches showing signal changes in the expected brain regions. Although there is more overall activity detected with magnitude data, the phase-only analysis also reveals activity in regions expected to be involved in the task, some of which were not significantly activated in the magnitude-only analysis, suggesting that the phase might provide some unique information. In addition, the phase can potentially increase sensitivity within regions also showing magnitude changes. Future work should focus on additional methods for combining the magnitude and phase data. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19900561      PMCID: PMC2848493          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  20 in total

1.  Quantitative differentiation between BOLD models in fMRI.

Authors:  F G Hoogenraad; P J Pouwels; M B Hofman; J R Reichenbach; M Sprenger; E M Haacke
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Motion correction algorithms may create spurious brain activations in the absence of subject motion.

Authors:  L Freire; J F Mangin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Characterizing instantaneous phase relationships in whole-brain fMRI activation data.

Authors:  Angela R Laird; Baxter P Rogers; John D Carew; Konstantinos Arfanakis; Chad H Moritz; M Elizabeth Meyerand
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  A complex way to compute fMRI activation.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Brent R Logan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Complex fMRI analysis with unrestricted phase is equivalent to a magnitude-only model.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Brent R Logan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Modeling both the magnitude and phase of complex-valued fMRI data.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Macrovascular contribution in activation patterns of working memory.

Authors:  Dardo G Tomasi; Elisabeth C Caparelli
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Functional brain imaging with BOSS FMRI.

Authors:  Karla L Miller; Brian A Hargreaves; Jongho Lee; David Ress; R Christopher deCharms; John M Pauly
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

9.  Sources of phase changes in BOLD and CBV-weighted fMRI.

Authors:  Fuqiang Zhao; Tao Jin; Ping Wang; Xiaoping Hu; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Simple group fMRI modeling and inference.

Authors:  Jeanette A Mumford; Thomas Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  10 in total

1.  Spatial source phase: A new feature for identifying spatial differences based on complex-valued resting-state fMRI data.

Authors:  Yue Qiu; Qiu-Hua Lin; Li-Dan Kuang; Xiao-Feng Gong; Fengyu Cong; Yu-Ping Wang; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Separation of parallel encoded complex-valued slices (SPECS) from a single complex-valued aliased coil image.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Iain P Bruce; Andrew S Nencka; James S Hyde; Mary C Kociuba
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 3.  Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal.

Authors:  César Caballero-Gaudes; Richard C Reynolds
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Phase Ambiguity Correction and Visualization Techniques for Complex-Valued ICA of Group fMRI Data.

Authors:  Pedro A Rodriguez; Vince D Calhoun; Tülay Adalı
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 7.740

5.  Magnitude and phase behavior of multiresolution BOLD signal.

Authors:  Zikuan Chen; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 1.176

6.  Application of independent component analysis with adaptive density model to complex-valued fMRI data.

Authors:  Hualiang Li; Nicolle M Correa; Pedro A Rodriguez; Vince D Calhoun; Tülay Adali
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Blood oxygenation level-dependent functional MRI signal turbulence caused by ultrahigh spatial resolution: numerical simulation and theoretical explanation.

Authors:  Zikuan Chen; Zeyuan Chen; Vince Calhoun
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  The role of diversity in complex ICA algorithms for fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Wei Du; Yuri Levin-Schwartz; Geng-Shen Fu; Sai Ma; Vince D Calhoun; Tülay Adalı
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  In-vivo Imaging of Magnetic Fields Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Human Brain using MRI.

Authors:  Mayank V Jog; Robert X Smith; Kay Jann; Walter Dunn; Belen Lafon; Dennis Truong; Allan Wu; Lucas Parra; Marom Bikson; Danny J J Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A multiple kernel learning approach to perform classification of groups from complex-valued fMRI data analysis: application to schizophrenia.

Authors:  Eduardo Castro; Vanessa Gómez-Verdejo; Manel Martínez-Ramón; Kent A Kiehl; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.