Literature DB >> 1989677

General base catalysis in a glutamine for histidine mutant at position 51 of human liver alcohol dehydrogenase.

T Ehrig1, T D Hurley, H J Edenberg, W F Bosron.   

Abstract

On the basis of the three-dimensional structure of horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase determined by X-ray crystallography, His 51 has been proposed to act as a general base during catalysis by abstracting a proton from the alcohol substrate. A hydrogen-bonding system (proton relay system) connecting the alcohol substrate and His 51 has been proposed to mediate proton transfer. We have mutated His 51 to Gln in the homologous human liver beta 1 beta 1 alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzyme which is expected to have a similar proton relay system. The mutation resulted in an about 6-fold drop in V/Kb (Vmax for ethanol oxidation divided by Km for ethanol) at pH 7.0 and a 12-fold drop at pH 6.5. V/Kb could be restored completely or partially by the presence of high concentrations of glycylglycine, glycine, and phosphate buffers. A Brønsted plot of the effect on V/Kb versus the pKa of these bases plus H2O and OH- was linear. Only secondary or tertiary amine buffers differed from linearity, presumably due to steric hindrance. These results suggest that His 51 acts as a general base catalyst during alcohol oxidation in the wild-type enzyme and can be functionally replaced in the mutant enzyme by general base catalysts present in the solvent. Steady-state kinetic constants for NAD+ and the trifluoroethanol inhibition patterns were similar between the wild-type and the mutant enzyme. Differences in the inhibition constants (Ki) of caprate and trifluoroethanol below pH 7.8 and in the pH dependence of Ki can be explained by the substitution of neutral Gln for positively charged His.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1989677     DOI: 10.1021/bi00218a026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  9 in total

1.  Ten-nanosecond molecular dynamics simulation of the motions of the horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase.PhCH2O- complex.

Authors:  Jia Luo; Thomas C Bruice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Progressive sequence alignment and molecular evolution of the Zn-containing alcohol dehydrogenase family.

Authors:  H W Sun; B V Plapp
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Mutations of gamma-aminobutyric acid and glycine receptors change alcohol cutoff: evidence for an alcohol receptor?

Authors:  M J Wick; S J Mihic; S Ueno; M P Mascia; J R Trudell; S J Brozowski; Q Ye; N L Harrison; R A Harris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Use of competitive dead-end inhibitors to determine the chemical mechanism of action of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase.

Authors:  V Leskovac; S Trivić; B M Anderson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Crystal structure of cod liver class I alcohol dehydrogenase: substrate pocket and structurally variable segments.

Authors:  S Ramaswamy; M el Ahmad; O Danielsson; H Jörnvall; H Eklund
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Brønsted analysis of aspartate aminotransferase via exogenous catalysis of reactions of an inactive mutant.

Authors:  M D Toney; J F Kirsch
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of binary and ternary complexes of Haloferax mediterranei glucose dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Julia Esclapez; K Linda Britton; Patrick J Baker; Martin Fisher; Carmen Pire; Juan Ferrer; María José Bonete; David W Rice
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2005-07-08

8.  The ternary complex of Pseudomonas aeruginosa alcohol dehydrogenase with NADH and ethylene glycol.

Authors:  Inna Levin; Gal Meiri; Moshe Peretz; Yigal Burstein; Felix Frolow
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  In silico identification of AMPylating enzymes and study of their divergent evolution.

Authors:  Shradha Khater; Debasisa Mohanty
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.