Literature DB >> 19896420

Stabilizing the baseline current of a microbial fuel cell-based biosensor through overpotential control under non-toxic conditions.

Nienke E Stein1, Hubertus V M Hamelers, Cees N J Buisman.   

Abstract

A MFC-based biosensor can act as online toxicity sensor. Electrical current is a direct linear measure for metabolic activity of electrochemically active microorganisms. Microorganisms gain energy from anodic overpotential and current strongly depends on anodic overpotential. Therefore control of anodic overpotential is necessary to detect toxic events and prevent false positive alarms. Anodic overpotential and thus current is influenced by anode potential, pH, substrate and bicarbonate concentrations. In terms of overpotential all factor showed a comparable effect, anode potential 1.2% change in current density per mV, pH 0.43%/mV, bicarbonate 0.75%/mV and acetate 0.8%/mV. At acetate saturation the maximum acetate conversion rate is reached and with that a constant bicarbonate concentration. Control of acetate and bicarbonate concentration can be less strict than control of anode potential and pH. Current density changes due to changing anode potential and pH are in the same order of magnitude as changes due to toxicity. Strict control of pH and anode potential in a small range is required. The importance of anodic overpotential control for detection of toxic compounds is shown. To reach a stable baseline current under nontoxic conditions a MFC-based biosensor should be operated at controlled anode potential, controlled pH and saturated substrate concentrations. 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19896420     DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2009.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry        ISSN: 1567-5394            Impact factor:   5.373


  8 in total

1.  Mechanism and toxicity research of benzalkonium chloride oxidation in aqueous solution by H2O2/Fe(2+) process.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Yu-Feng Xia; Jun-Ming Hong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Effect of toxic components on microbial fuel cell-polarization curves and estimation of the type of toxic inhibition.

Authors:  Nienke E Stein; Hubertus V M Hamelers; Gerrit van Straten; Karel J Keesman
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-07-11

Review 3.  Water Quality Monitoring in Developing Countries; Can Microbial Fuel Cells be the Answer?

Authors:  Jon Chouler; Mirella Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-16

Review 4.  Microbial Fuels Cell-Based Biosensor for Toxicity Detection: A Review.

Authors:  Tuoyu Zhou; Huawen Han; Pu Liu; Jian Xiong; Fake Tian; Xiangkai Li
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Microbial fuel cells for in-field water quality monitoring.

Authors:  Lola Gonzalez Olias; Mirella Di Lorenzo
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Effects of storage on mixed-culture biological electrodes.

Authors:  Soroush Saheb Alam; Frank Persson; Britt-Marie Wilén; Malte Hermansson; Oskar Modin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A Portable, Single-Use, Paper-Based Microbial Fuel Cell Sensor for Rapid, On-Site Water Quality Monitoring.

Authors:  Jong Hyun Cho; Yang Gao; Seokheun Choi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  A Current Sensing Biosensor for BOD Rapid Measurement.

Authors:  Yiman Liu; Jie Li; Nianxin Wan; Tianyu Fu; Lili Wang; Cong Li; Zhonghui Qie; Ao Zhu
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.273

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.