| Literature DB >> 33192181 |
Yiman Liu1, Jie Li1,2, Nianxin Wan3, Tianyu Fu1, Lili Wang1, Cong Li1, Zhonghui Qie1, Ao Zhu1.
Abstract
In order to improve the practicality of the rapid biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) method, a highly sensitive rapid detection method for BOD that is based on establishing the correlation between current and dissolved oxygen (DO) was developed. In this experiment, Bacillus subtilis was used as the test microorganism, and the embedding method was used to achieve quantitative fixation of microorganisms, which could increase the content of microorganisms and prolong the service life of the biological element. The conductivity (COND) probe is used as a sensing element, so that the testing value can be read every second. In the program, the moving average method is used to process the collected data so that the value can be read every minute. National standard samples were detected to test the accuracy and stability of the method. The results showed that relative error and analytical standard deviations were less than 5%. Different polluted water was tested to evaluate its application range. The results showed that relative error was less than 5%. The results of the method are consistent with the results of the wastewater sample obtained by the BOD5 standard method. The proposed rapid BOD current sensing biosensor method should be promising in practical application of wastewater monitoring.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33192181 PMCID: PMC7641274 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8894925
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Archaea ISSN: 1472-3646 Impact factor: 3.273
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the current sensing biosensor for BOD.
Figure 2The appearance of the prototype.
Figure 3Testing results of glucose-glutonic acid solution: (a) 200 mg L−1; (b) 400 mg L−1; (c) 600 mg L−1; (d) 800 mg L−1.
The results of GGA standard solution.
| Standard sample guaranteed value | Average BOD (mg L−1) | Relative mean deviation (%) | Maximum relative deviation (%) | Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 ± 16 | 223.0 | 3.0 | 6.2 | 11.5 |
| 400 ± 32 | 369.4 | 1.0 | 3.3 | -7.6 |
| 600 ± 48 | 603.4 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 0.6 |
| 800 ± 64 | 778.0 | 3.8 | 7.1 | -2.5 |
The results of standard sample BOD mass concentration.
| Sample no. | Average BOD (mg L−1) | Error (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prototype measured value | Standard sample guaranteed value | ||
| 1 | 169.5 | 170.0 | -0.3 |
| 2 | 106.8 | 107 ± 9 | -0.8 |
| 3 | 10.2 | 10.5 ± 2.4 | -2.5 |
| 4 | 598.3 | 600 ± 49.7 | -0.3 |
| 5 | 997.8 | 1050 ± 87 | -0.2 |
The results of continuous monitoring.
| Experiment no. | BOD (mg L−1) | |
|---|---|---|
| Influent | Effluent | |
| 1 | 1140.2 | 130.1 |
| 2 | 1089.5 | 141.1 |
| 3 | 1020.4 | 125.8 |
| 4 | 1001.9 | 119.6 |
| 5 | 1067.5 | 120.1 |
| 6 | 1123.2 | 128.1 |
| Average | 1073.8 | 127.5 |
The results of typical samples.
| Sample | Average BOD (mg L−1) | Error (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prototype | BOD5 | ||
| Domestic sewage | 98.3 | 101.3 | -3.0 |
| Printing and dyeing wastewater | 99.1 | 109.7 | 9.7 |
| Gray water | 73.9 | 75.1 | -1.5 |
| Industrial wastewater | 248.3 | 261.4 | -5.0 |