Literature DB >> 19896174

Penile fracture: long-term outcome of immediate surgical intervention.

el-Housseiny I Ibrahiem1, Hossam S el-Tholoth, Tarek Mohsen, Ihab A Hekal, Ahmed el-Assmy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the etiology and the late effects of penile fractures treated by immediate surgical intervention.
METHODS: Between 1986 and 2008, a total of 155 patients with penile fracture were treated surgically in our center. The interval from injury to presentation was between 1 and 96 hours. Those patients were contacted by mail or phone and were re-evaluated. All patients were re-evaluated by questionnaire and local examination. Patients with erectile dysfunction were evaluated by color Doppler ultrasonography.
RESULTS: The most common cause of fracture of penis is sexual intercourse (51.5%). Unilateral and bilateral corporeal ruptures were present in 139 (89.7%) and 3 (1.9%) cases, respectively, whereas no tunical tear was found in 13 (8.4%) cases. Concomitant urethral injury was present in 14 (9%) cases. Long-term follow-up (>12 months) was available for 141 patients; among whom there was no complications in 108 (77%), painful erection in 2 (1.3%), penile deviation in 5 (3.2%), both in 1 (0.7%), erectile dysfunction in 11 (7.8%), and palpable scarring in 14 (10%). Scar formation was highly associated using nonabsorbable sutures (P <.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Vigorous sexual intercourse was found to be the most common cause of penile fracture. Immediate surgical intervention has low morbidity, short hospital stay, rapid functional recovery, and no serious long-term sequelae. Nonabsorbable sutures should be avoided as it has a higher incidence of scar formation. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19896174     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  24 in total

1.  Penile fracture with urethral injury: evaluation by contrast imaging.

Authors:  Manish Garg; Apul Goel; Deepansh Dalela; Sachin Patil
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-08-20

2.  Urotrauma: AUA guideline.

Authors:  Allen F Morey; Steve Brandes; Daniel David Dugi; John H Armstrong; Benjamin N Breyer; Joshua A Broghammer; Bradley A Erickson; Jeff Holzbeierlein; Steven J Hudak; Jeffrey H Pruitt; James T Reston; Richard A Santucci; Thomas G Smith; Hunter Wessells
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Penile fracture with bilateral corporeal rupture without urethral involvement.

Authors:  Tarik Yonguc; Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Bumin Ors; Zafer Kozacioglu; Burak Arslan; Nilufer Goksin Yonguc
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Penile fracture with bilateral corpus cavernosa tears and complete urethral disruption.

Authors:  Deepak Batura; Asif Raza; Michael Mikhail; Tumaj Hashemzehi; Malwina Julia Figaszewska
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Effects of penile fracture and its surgical treatment on psychosocial and sexual function.

Authors:  M S Bolat; M Özen; K Önem; A Açıkgöz; R Asci
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 2.896

6.  Penile fracture with bilateral corporeal rupture and complete urethral disruption: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Nathan A Hoag; Kiara Hennessey; Alan So
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Comparison of different approaches to the surgical treatment of penile fractures: quicker return to sexual function with longitudinal incisions.

Authors:  M X Xu; Z Zhou; H J Yao; K Zhang; J Da; M Zhang; Z Wang; M J Lu
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  Penile vascular indices in surgically treated and conservatively treated penile fracture: does conventional immediate repair matter?

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Safarinejad; Mohammad Hossein Lashkari; Alireza Babaei; Farid Dadkhah; Ali Asghar Kolahi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Sexual function outcomes following fracture of the penis.

Authors:  Gregory J Nason; Barry B McGuire; Stephen Liddy; Aisling Looney; Gerald M Lennon; David W Mulvin; David J Galvin; David M Quinlan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Penile fracture with two ipsilateral corporal tears and delayed presentation: A case report.

Authors:  Emad Rajih; Abdullah Alenizi; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.