Literature DB >> 19896082

Successful stem cell remobilization using plerixafor (mozobil) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with non-hodgkin lymphoma: results from the plerixafor NHL phase 3 study rescue protocol.

Ivana N Micallef1, Patrick J Stiff, John F DiPersio, Richard T Maziarz, John M McCarty, Gary Bridger, Gary Calandra.   

Abstract

In a phase 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of 298 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus plerixafor increased the proportion of patients who mobilized >or=5 x 10(6) CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs)/kg compared with placebo plus G-CSF (P < .001). Patients in either study arm who failed mobilization (< 0.8 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in 2 collections or <2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in 4 collections) were eligible to enter the opened-label rescue protocol. Following a 7-day minimum rest period, these patients received G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day) for 4 days, followed by daily plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg) plus G-CSF and apheresis for up to 4 days. Of the 68 patients failing initial mobilization (plerixafor, n = 11; placebo, n = 57), 62 patients (91%) entered the rescue procedure (plerixafor, n = 10; placebo, n = 52). Four of 10 patients (40%) from the plerixafor group and 33 of 52 (63%) from the placebo group mobilized sufficient CD34(+) cells (>or= 2 x 10(6) cells/kg) for transplantation from the rescue mobilization alone (P = .11). Engraftment of neutrophils (11 days) and platelets (20 days) was similar to that in patients who did not fail initial mobilization, and all patients had durable grafts at the 12-month follow-up. Common plerixafor-related adverse events (AEs) included mild gastrointestinal (GI) effects and injection site reactions. There were no drug-related serious AEs. These data support that plerixafor plus G-CSF can safely and effectively remobilize patients with NHL who have failed previous mobilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19896082     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  24 in total

1.  The effective use of plerixafor as a real-time rescue strategy for patients poorly mobilizing autologous CD34(+) cells.

Authors:  Ajay K Gopal; Mehdi Karami; JoAl Mayor; Mylene Macebeo; Michael Linenberger; William I Bensinger; Leona Holmberg
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Significant mobilization of both conventional and regulatory T cells with AMD3100.

Authors:  Leslie S Kean; Sharon Sen; Olusegun Onabajo; Karnail Singh; Jennifer Robertson; Linda Stempora; Aylin C Bonifacino; Mark E Metzger; Daniel E L Promislow; Joseph J Mattapallil; Robert E Donahue
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study.

Authors:  S Afifi; N G Adel; S Devlin; E Duck; J Vanak; H Landau; D J Chung; N Lendvai; A Lesokhin; N Korde; L Reich; O Landgren; S Giralt; H Hassoun
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 4.  Autologous haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients: a position statement from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  M Mohty; K Hübel; N Kröger; M Aljurf; J Apperley; G W Basak; A Bazarbachi; K Douglas; I Gabriel; L Garderet; C Geraldes; O Jaksic; M W Kattan; Z Koristek; F Lanza; R M Lemoli; L Mendeleeva; G Mikala; N Mikhailova; A Nagler; H C Schouten; D Selleslag; S Suciu; A Sureda; N Worel; P Wuchter; C Chabannon; R F Duarte
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 5.  Mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using inhibitors of CXCR4 and VLA-4.

Authors:  M P Rettig; G Ansstas; J F DiPersio
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Upfront use of plerixafor and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: efficacy and analysis of risk factors associated with poor stem cell collection efficiency.

Authors:  Adebayo Ogunniyi; Mabel Rodriguez; Sean Devlin; Nelly Adel; Heather Landau; David J Chung; Nikoletta Lendvai; Alexander Lesokhin; Guenther Koehne; Sham Mailankody; Neha Korde; Lilian Reich; Ola Landgren; Sergio Giralt; Hani Hassoun
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2016-10-13

7.  An effective mobilization strategy for lymphoma patients after failed upfront mobilization with plerixafor.

Authors:  B M Haverkos; A McBride; L O'Donnell; D Scholl; B Whittaker; S Vasu; S Penza; L A Andritsos; S M Devine; S M Jaglowski
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.

Authors:  A Antar; Z K Otrock; M A Kharfan-Dabaja; H A Ghaddara; N Kreidieh; R Mahfouz; A Bazarbachi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 9.  Plerixafor: a review of its use in stem-cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 deficiency augments G-CSF induced myeloid cell mobilization.

Authors:  Kornél Miszti-Blasius; Szabolcs Felszeghy; Csongor Kiss; Ilona Benkő; Krisztina Géresi; Attila Megyeri; Zsuzsanna Hevessy; János Kappelmayer
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.