Literature DB >> 19896001

Quantitative assessment of pleasant touch.

Greg K Essick1, Francis McGlone, Chris Dancer, David Fabricant, Yancy Ragin, Nicola Phillips, Therese Jones, Steve Guest.   

Abstract

The hedonic attributes of tactile stimulation are important to one's quality of life, yet they have rarely been studied scientifically. The earliest experimental investigations suggested soft and smooth materials as pleasant, those that were stiff, rough, or coarse as unpleasant. More recent studies conducted by the authors and described herein obtained ratings of pleasantness of different textured materials stroked across the skin of multiple body sites at controlled velocities and forces of application. Statistically significant interactions between materials, sites, velocities, forces and subject sex attest to the complexity of the percept. Less pleasant percepts arose from stimuli that were rougher. However, the difficulty in making further general statements regarding hedonic touch raises questions as to whether the body surface can be mapped affectively in a meaningful manner with a single stimulus and indeed whether pleasantness-to-touch can be viewed as a unidimensional construct.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19896001     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  55 in total

1.  Brain mechanisms for processing affective touch.

Authors:  Ilanit Gordon; Avery C Voos; Randi H Bennett; Danielle Z Bolling; Kevin A Pelphrey; Martha D Kaiser
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Tactile motion lacks momentum.

Authors:  Gianluca Macauda; Bigna Lenggenhager; Rebekka Meier; Gregory Essick; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-08

3.  Perceptual and neural response to affective tactile texture stimulation in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Carissa J Cascio; Estephan J Moana-Filho; Steve Guest; Mary Beth Nebel; Jonathan Weisner; Grace T Baranek; Gregory K Essick
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 5.216

4.  Emotion recognition in objects in patients with neurological disease.

Authors:  Michelle N Shiota; Michaela L Simpson; Heidi E Kirsch; Robert W Levenson
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Defining pleasant touch stimuli: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pankaj Taneja; Håkan Olausson; Mats Trulsson; Peter Svensson; Lene Baad-Hansen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-19

6.  Self-reported Pleasantness Ratings and Examiner-Coded Defensiveness in Response to Touch in Children with ASD: Effects of Stimulus Material and Bodily Location.

Authors:  Carissa J Cascio; Jill Lorenzi; Grace T Baranek
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-05

7.  The arousing power of everyday materials: an analysis of the physiological and behavioral responses to visually and tactually presented textures.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cochlear SGN neurons elevate pain thresholds in response to music.

Authors:  R I M Dunbar; Eiluned Pearce; Bronwyn Tarr; Adarsh Makdani; Joshua Bamford; Sharon Smith; Francis McGlone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Feel-Good Requirements: Neurophysiological and Psychological Design Criteria of Affective Touch for (Assistive) Robots.

Authors:  Mehmet Ege Cansev; Daniel Nordheimer; Elsa Andrea Kirchner; Philipp Beckerle
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Psychological and physiological effect in humans of touching plant foliage - using the semantic differential method and cerebral activity as indicators.

Authors:  Kazuko Koga; Yutaka Iwasaki
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.