Literature DB >> 19894795

Analysis of categorical response data: use logistic regression rather than endpoint-difference scores or discriminant analysis.

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Maria V Kondaurova.   

Abstract

Example of a typical second-language (L2) speech perception experiment: Synthetic vowel stimuli from a two-dimensional grid of points in which acoustic properties vary systematically in duration and spectral properties are classified as English /i/ or /I/ by L2-English listeners. In a number of studies, the data from such experiments have been analyzed using endpoint-difference scores or discriminant analysis. The current letter describes theoretical problems inherent in the first procedure in general, and in the application of the second procedure to data of this type in particular. Logistic regression is proposed as an alternative, which does not suffer from these problems.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19894795     DOI: 10.1121/1.3216917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing?

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein; Eric Tarr; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; D Bradley Welling; Antoine J Shahin; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The role of selective attention in the acquisition of English tense and lax vowels by native Spanish listeners: comparison of three training methods.

Authors:  Maria V Kondaurova; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2010-10-01

4.  How Mixed-Effects Modeling Can Advance Our Understanding of Learning and Memory and Improve Clinical and Educational Practice.

Authors:  Katherine R Gordon
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Individual differences in categorical perception of speech: Cue weighting and executive function.

Authors:  Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2016-09-23

6.  Specialization along the left superior temporal sulcus for auditory categorization.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; Rutvik Desai; Michael M Ellingson; Brinda Ramachandran; Anjali Desai; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast.

Authors:  Jessamyn Schertz; Taehong Cho; Andrew Lotto; Natasha Warner
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2015-09-01

8.  Perceptual weighting strategies of children with cochlear implants and normal hearing.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Roles of voice onset time and F0 in stop consonant voicing perception: effects of masking noise and low-pass filtering.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.