Literature DB >> 19891806

Can pharmacotherapists be too supportive? A process study of active medication and placebo in the treatment of depression.

D R Strunk1, M O Stewart, S D Hollon, R J DeRubeis, J Fawcett, J D Amsterdam, R C Shelton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined therapist-patient interactions during clinical management with antidepressant medication and pill-placebo.
METHOD: The sample consisted of 80 patients on active medication and 40 patients in a pill-placebo condition from a randomized controlled trial for moderate to severe depression. Pharmacotherapist-patient interactions were characterized using observer ratings of the therapeutic alliance, pharmacotherapist-offered facilitative conditions, pharmacotherapist adherence to clinical management treatment guidelines and pharmacotherapist competence. Patients, therapists and raters were blind to treatment condition and outcome.
RESULTS: Provision of greater non-specific support (facilitative conditions) in early sessions predicted less subsequent improvement in depressive symptoms for patients receiving pill-placebo but not those receiving active medications, for which none of the process ratings predicted subsequent change. Early symptom change predicted later alliance and adherence in both conditions and therapist competence in the active condition.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of support in early sessions predict poorer subsequent response among placebo patients. It remains unclear whether patients who are likely to be refractory elicit greater non-specific support or whether the provision of such support has a deleterious effect in unmedicated patients. Differences in treatment process variables between conditions late in treatment are likely to be largely a consequence of symptom relief produced by active medications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19891806      PMCID: PMC3743545          DOI: 10.1017/S0033291709991553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  17 in total

1.  Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  D J Martin; J P Garske; M K Davis
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-06

2.  The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

Authors:  J L Krupnick; S M Sotsky; S Simmens; J Moyer; I Elkin; J Watkins; P A Pilkonis
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1996-06

3.  Applying the Collaborative Study Psychotherapy Rating Scale to rate therapist adherence in cognitive-behavior therapy, interpersonal therapy, and clinical management.

Authors:  C E Hill; K E O'Grady; I Elkin
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-02

Review 4.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Preventing hung juries about therapy studies.

Authors:  D F Klein
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1996-02

6.  Contribution of the therapeutic alliance to outcome in active versus control psychotherapies.

Authors:  K M Carroll; C Nich; B J Rounsaville
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1997-06

7.  Clinical management--imipramine/placebo administration manual. NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

Authors:  J Fawcett; P Epstein; S J Fiester; I Elkin; J H Autry
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1987

Review 8.  The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy.

Authors:  A O Horvath; L Luborsky
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1993-08

9.  Alliance predicts patients' outcome beyond in-treatment change in symptoms.

Authors:  J P Barber; M B Connolly; P Crits-Christoph; L Gladis; L Siqueland
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-12

10.  A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

Authors:  J B Williams
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1988-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  The process of change in cognitive therapy for depression when combined with antidepressant medication: Predictors of early intersession symptom gains.

Authors:  Daniel R Strunk; Andrew A Cooper; Elizabeth T Ryan; Robert J DeRubeis; Steven D Hollon
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2012-07-09

2.  Therapeutic alliance in antidepressant treatment: cause or effect of symptomatic levels?

Authors:  Sigal Zilcha-Mano; Steven P Roose; Jacques P Barber; Bret R Rutherford
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 17.659

3.  The associations among improvement and alliance expectations, alliance during treatment, and treatment outcome for major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Jacques P Barber; Sigal Zilcha-Mano; Robert Gallop; Marna Barrett; Kevin S McCarthy; Ulrike Dinger
Journal:  Psychother Res       Date:  2014-01-07

4.  The therapeutic alliance and therapist adherence as predictors of dropout from cognitive therapy for depression when combined with antidepressant medication.

Authors:  Andrew A Cooper; Daniel R Strunk; Elizabeth T Ryan; Robert J DeRubeis; Steven D Hollon; Robert Gallop
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2015-07-02

Review 5.  Common Factors in Pediatric Psychiatry: A Review of Essential and Adjunctive Mechanisms of Treatment Outcome.

Authors:  Alessandro S De Nadai; Marc S Karver; Tanya K Murphy; Mark A Cavitt; Jeffrey L Alvaro; Michael Bengtson; Saundra Stock; Andrew C Rakhshani; Eric A Storch
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.576

6.  Role of pill-taking, expectation and therapeutic alliance in the placebo response in clinical trials for major depression.

Authors:  Andrew F Leuchter; Aimee M Hunter; Molly Tartter; Ian A Cook
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 9.319

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.