| Literature DB >> 19890664 |
Maris Kuningas1, David van Bodegom, Linda May, Johannes J Meij, P Eline Slagboom, Rudi G J Westendorp.
Abstract
Various studies in mice have found support for the hypothesis that heterozygous carriers of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations have an increased resistance to fatal infection compared to both homozygous mutation carriers and non-carriers, while in humans such evidence is scarce. In this study, we assessed the CFTR heterozygotes survival advantage hypothesis in a contemporary rural population that lives under adverse environmental conditions in the Upper-East region of Ghana. We genotyped 30 SNPs throughout the CFTR gene in 4,230 participants and tested their influence on survival and on body composition in the population at large. With a sliding-window haplotype analysis, we identified a set of six common haplotypes that influenced survival probabilities (global p = 6.00 x 10(-05)). Individual haplotype analyses revealed two haplotypes of specific interest. One of these haplotypes was enriched (p = 0.003), whereas the other was depleted (p = 0.041) among people of old age (> or = 65 years) compared to young study participants (< or = 5 years). In addition, children (n = 474) carrying the latter haplotype had lower body weight (p (trend) = 0.020) and height (p (trend) = 0.010) compared to non-carriers. For all these analyses, similar associations for heterozygous and homozygous CFTR haplotype carriers were observed, revealing an additive effect of haplotype alleles. In conclusion, we identified common haplotypes in the CFTR gene that influence survival and body composition in the population at large with no evidence for heterozygote advantage.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19890664 PMCID: PMC2806536 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-009-0762-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Genet ISSN: 0340-6717 Impact factor: 4.132
Characteristics of the study population
|
| 4,230 |
| Women ( | 2,888 (68%) |
| Elderly (≥65 years, | 819 (19%) |
| Children (≤5 years, | 936 (22%) |
| Children ≤5 years measured ( | 474 (11%) |
| Weight (mean, SD) | 13.5 (1.84) |
| Height (mean, SD) | 94.7 (7.04) |
Fig. 1The genetic structure of CFTR gene and −log p-values for the global association of CFTR haplotype frequency differences between young (≤5 years, n = 936) and old (≥65 years, n = 819) study participants, as assessed by sliding-window haplotype analysis. Analysis was adjusted for sex, socioeconomic status and tribe
Fig. 2CFTR haplotypes and its frequencies in the general population (n = 4,230) (a), and in the young (≤5 years, n = 936) and old (≥65 years, n = 819) study participants (b). Underlining denotes the minor allele. Differences in haplotype frequencies between young and old were analyzed using sex, socioeconomic status and tribe adjusted Haplo.stats
The prevalence of CFTR haplotypes in the group of old (≥65 years) study participants compared to young (≤5 years)
| Young versus old | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-copies | 1-copy | 2-copies |
| |
| Haplotype 1 | 1 (reference) | 0.91 (0.75–1.10) | 0.69 (0.47–1.01) | 0.06 |
| Haplotype 2 | 1 (reference) | 1.16 (0.96–1.41) | 1.06 (0.66–1.71) | 0.22 |
| Haplotype 3 | 1 (reference) | 1.15 (0.94–1.40) | 0.85 (0.49–1.48) | 0.47 |
| Haplotype 4 | 1 (reference) | 0.93 (0.76–1.14) | 0.54 (0.27–1.08) | 0.13 |
| Haplotype 5 | 1 (reference) | 1.26 (1.02–1.55)* | 2.20 (1.07–4.52)* | 0.004* |
| Haplotype 6 | 1 (reference) | 1.07 (0.81–1.40) | 1.14 (0.12–10.5) | 0.65 |
Odds ratios were calculated using sex, socioeconomic status and tribe adjusted logistic regression
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
* p < 0.05
Fig. 3The influence of CFTR haplotypes on weight and height in children equal to or younger than 5 years of age (n = 474). Linear regression adjusted for sex, socioeconomic status and tribe