| Literature DB >> 19889803 |
Raffaele Marfella1, Michelangela Barbieri, Roberto Ruggiero, Maria Rosaria Rizzo, Rodolfo Grella, Anna Licia Mozzillo, Ludovico Docimo, Giuseppe Paolisso.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy of malabsorptive bariatric surgery on daily blood glucose fluctuations and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetic obese patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The 48-h continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring was assessed in type 2 diabetic patients before and 1 month after biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) (n = 36), or after diet-induced equivalent weight loss (n = 20). The mean amplitude of glycemic excursions and oxidative stress (nitrotyrosine) were evaluated during continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring. During a standardized meal, glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, glucagon, and insulin were measured.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19889803 PMCID: PMC2809267 DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Care ISSN: 0149-5992 Impact factor: 19.112
Clinical characteristics and metabolic profile before and after 1 month after biliopancreatic diversion or 10-kg weight loss
| Biliopancreatic diversion group | Diet group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | After 1 month | Baseline | After 10-kg weight loss | |||
| Age (years) | 45 ± 8 | — | — | 46 ± 6 | — | — |
| Male/female sex ( | 16/20 | 16/20 | — | 9/11 | 9/11 | — |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 43.7 ± 2.9 | 39.1 ± 3.2 | 0.01 | 43.6 ± 3.1 | 38.9 ± 3.3 | 0.01 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 120 ± 12 | 119 ± 13 | NS | 121 ± 13 | 120 ± 10 | NS |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 79 ± 5 | 78 ± 3 | NS | 80 ± 4 | 79 ± 3 | NS |
| Diabetes duration (years) | 3.2 ± 4 | — | — | 3.1 ± 6 | — | — |
| Risk factors | ||||||
| Hypertension | 9 (25) | — | — | 5 (25) | — | — |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 4 (11) | — | — | 2 (10) | — | — |
| Smokers | 4 (11) | — | — | 2 (10) | — | — |
| Laboratory | ||||||
| Fasting glycemia (mg/dl) | 129 ± 19 | 109 ± 12 | 0.01 | 128 ± 13 | 106 ± 14 | 0.01 |
| 2-h postprandial glycemia (mg/dl) | 186 ± 23 | 164 ± 16 | 0.01 | 185 ± 21 | 165 ± 15 | 0.01 |
| A1C (%) | 7.1 ± 0.4 | 6.8 ± 0.3 | 0.01 | 7.0 ± 0.5 | 6.6 ± 0.4 | 0.01 |
| MAGE (mg/dl glucose) | 61 ± 13 | 35 ± 12 | 0.01 | 60 ± 21 | 55 ± 14 | NS |
| Nitrotyrosine (μmol/l) | 0.81 ± 0.04 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.79 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0.06 | NS |
| Fasting insulin (pmol/l) | 170 ± 55 | 131 ± 48 | 0.01 | 178 ± 68 | 127 ± 50 | 0.01 |
| Postmeal insulin AUC (pmol/l) | 498 ± 179 | 669 ± 135 | 0.01 | 505 ± 157 | 655 ± 122 | 0.01 |
| Interprandial insulin AUC (pmol · l−1 · min−1) | 325 ± 124 | 290 ± 108 | 0.01 | 339 ± 111 | 301 ± 122 | 0.01 |
| Fasting glucagon (ng/l) | 71.9 ± 12 | 65.3 ± 11.6 | NS | 69.9 ± 13 | 66.2 ± 11 | NS |
| Postmeal glucagon AUC (ng/l) | 68.3 ± 14 | 50 ± 9 | 0.01 | 66.7 ± 10 | 53 ± 12 | 0.01 |
| Interprandial glucagon AUC (ng · l−1 · min−1) | 70.7 ± 13 | 53.6 ± 12 | 0.01 | 69.3 ± 12 | 68.6 ± 13 | NS |
| Fasting GLP-1 (pmol/l) | 6.5 ± 1.2 | 7.1 ± 1.1 | NS | 6.6 ± 1.8 | 6.9 ± 1.5 | NS |
| Postmeal GLP-1 AUC (pmol/l) | 9.9 ± 2.1 | 18.7 ± 3.2 | 0.01 | 10.2 ± 2.9 | 19.3 ± 2.6 | 0.01 |
| Interprandial GLP-1 AUC (pmol · l−1 · min−1) | 6.2 ± 1.1 | 11.7 ± 2.5 | 0.01 | 6.5 ± 1.3 | 7.2 ± 1.4 | NS |
| Active therapy | ||||||
| ACE inhibitors | 5 (14) | 5 (14) | — | 3 (15) | 3 (15) | — |
| Angiotensin II antagonists | 4 (11) | 4 (11) | — | 2 (10) | 2 (10) | — |
| Diuretics | 4 (11) | 4 (11) | — | 2 (10) | 2 (10) | — |
| Aspirin | 10 (28) | 10 (28) | — | 6 (30) | 6 (30) | — |
| Statins | 8 (22) | 8 (22) | — | 5 (25) | 5 (25) | — |
| Metformin | 32 (89) | 32 (89) | — | 18 (90) | 18 (90) | — |
| Thiazolinediones | 10 (28) | 10 (28) | — | 6 (30) | 6 (30) | — |
Data are means ± SD or n (%) unless otherwise indicated. Postmeal (0–120 min) and interprandial (120–300 min after meal) areas under the curve (AUCs) for outcome variables were calculated using the trapezoidal method.
*P < 0.05 compared with the diet group. Nitrotyrosine was assayed as described previously (8): the standard curve was constructed with serial dilution of a nitrated protein solution; the limit of detection of the assay was 10 nmol/l, with intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of 4.5 and 8%, respectively.