Literature DB >> 19886504

Estimating habitat selection when GPS fix success is less than 100%.

Ryan M Nielson1, Bryan F J Manly, Lyman L McDonald, Hall Sawyer, Trent L McDonald.   

Abstract

Inferences about habitat selection by animals derived from sequences of relocations obtained with global positioning system (GPS) collars can be influenced by GPS fix success. Environmental factors such as dense canopy cover or rugged terrain can reduce GPS fix success, making subsequent modeling problematic if fix success depends on the selected habitat. Ignoring failed fix attempts may affect estimates of model coefficients and lead to incorrect conclusions about habitat selection. Here, we present a habitat selection model that accounts for missing locations due to habitat-induced data losses, called a resource selection function (RSF) for GPS fix success. The model's formulation is similar to adjusting estimates of probability of occupancy when detection is less than 100% in patch occupancy sampling. We demonstrate use of the model with GPS data collected from an adult female mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and discuss how to analyze data from multiple animals. In the simulations presented, our habitat selection model was generally unbiased for GPS data sets missing up to 50% of the locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19886504     DOI: 10.1890/08-1562.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  13 in total

Review 1.  Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity?

Authors:  John Fieberg; Jason Matthiopoulos; Mark Hebblewhite; Mark S Boyce; Jacqueline L Frair
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use-availability designs.

Authors:  Hawthorne L Beyer; Daniel T Haydon; Juan M Morales; Jacqueline L Frair; Mark Hebblewhite; Michael Mitchell; Jason Matthiopoulos
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Frair; John Fieberg; Mark Hebblewhite; Francesca Cagnacci; Nicholas J DeCesare; Luca Pedrotti
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Conceptual and methodological advances in habitat-selection modeling: guidelines for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Joseph M Northrup; Eric Vander Wal; Maegwin Bonar; John Fieberg; Michel P Laforge; Martin Leclerc; Christina M Prokopenko; Brian D Gerber
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 6.105

5.  Dynamic approach to space and habitat use based on biased random bridges.

Authors:  Simon Benhamou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Is there a single best estimator? Selection of home range estimators using area-under-the-curve.

Authors:  W David Walter; Dave P Onorato; Justin W Fischer
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.600

7.  Estimating resource selection with count data.

Authors:  Ryan M Nielson; Hall Sawyer
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  A hidden Markov model to identify and adjust for selection bias: an example involving mixed migration strategies.

Authors:  John R Fieberg; Paul B Conn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Quantifying Migration Behaviour Using Net Squared Displacement Approach: Clarifications and Caveats.

Authors:  Navinder J Singh; Andrew M Allen; Göran Ericsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Seasonal and circadian biases in bird tracking with solar GPS-tags.

Authors:  Rafa Silva; Isabel Afán; Juan A Gil; Javier Bustamante
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.