Literature DB >> 19886490

For ant-protected plants, the best defense is a hungry offense.

J H Ness1, W F Morris, Judith L Bronstein.   

Abstract

Animal foraging has been characterized as an attempt to maximize the intake of carbon and nitrogen at appropriate ratios. Plant species in over 90 families produce carbohydrate-rich extrafloral nectar (EFN), a resource attractive to ants and other omnivorous insects. This attraction can benefit the plant if those arthropods subsequently attack herbivores. This protective response has been attributed to the increased visitation and "ownership" of plants that provide a predictable source of fuel. Here, we propose and test an alternative (but non-mutually exclusive) hypothesis, that access to C-rich carbohydrates increases the ants' desire for N-rich protein and hence the likelihood that they will attack herbivorous insects on the host plant. This "deficit hypothesis" would be rejected if (1) EFN were itself a sufficiently balanced food source in terms of C and N, (2) ant dietary preferences were similar in the presence vs. absence of EFN, (3) protein-hungry ants were not more predaceous, or (4) ants provided access to protein were more aggressive toward potential prey items than were ants provided access to carbohydrates. We test these predictions in a protective mutualism between a guild of desert ants and the barrel cactus Ferocactus wislizeni. C:N ratios of EFN exceeded that of ants or potential prey items by an order of magnitude (i.e., EFN is an N-poor food for ants). Baiting studies demonstrated that plant-tending ant species recruited more workers to N-rich protein baits than to C-rich sugar baits; this difference was more pronounced when the ants had access to F. wislizeni EFN. From these data, we infer that protein is a valuable resource and that its relative value increases when carbohydrates are readily available. Moreover, ant colonies provided access to supplemental carbohydrates responded more aggressively to surrogate herbivores than did control colonies (to which no additional resources were provided) or colonies provided protein. These results support the predictions of the "deficit" hypothesis, wherein plant protection is elicited by plant-mediated dietary imbalances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19886490     DOI: 10.1890/08-1580.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  19 in total

1.  The diversity, ecology and evolution of extrafloral nectaries: current perspectives and future challenges.

Authors:  Brigitte Marazzi; Judith L Bronstein; Suzanne Koptur
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Different trophic groups of arboreal ants show differential responses to resource supplementation in a neotropical savanna.

Authors:  Laila F Ribeiro; Ricardo R C Solar; Tathiana G Sobrinho; Dalana C Muscardi; José H Schoereder; Alan N Andersen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  An ant-plant mutualism through the lens of cGMP-dependent kinase genes.

Authors:  Pierre-Jean G Malé; Kyle M Turner; Manjima Doha; Ina Anreiter; Aaron M Allen; Marla B Sokolowski; Megan E Frederickson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Composition of extrafloral nectar influences interactions between the myrmecophyte Humboldtia brunonis and its ant associates.

Authors:  Megha Shenoy; Venkatesan Radhika; Suma Satish; Renee M Borges
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Differential Recruitment of Camponotus femoratus (Fabricius) Ants in Response to Ant Garden Herbivory.

Authors:  R E Vicente; W Dáttilo; T J Izzo
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.434

6.  Non-additive benefit or cost? Disentangling the indirect effects that occur when plants bearing extrafloral nectaries and honeydew-producing insects share exotic ant mutualists.

Authors:  Amy M Savage; Jennifer A Rudgers
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Thermal tolerance affects mutualist attendance in an ant-plant protection mutualism.

Authors:  Ginny Fitzpatrick; Michele C Lanan; Judith L Bronstein
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Indirect effects of mutualism: ant-treehopper associations deter pollinators and reduce reproduction in a tropical shrub.

Authors:  Javier Ibarra-Isassi; Paulo S Oliveira
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  An ant's-eye view of an ant-plant protection mutualism.

Authors:  M C Lanan; J L Bronstein
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Increased host investment in extrafloral nectar (EFN) improves the efficiency of a mutualistic defensive service.

Authors:  Marcia González-Teuber; Juan Carlos Silva Bueno; Martin Heil; Wilhelm Boland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.