Literature DB >> 19885658

Effective population size of a population with stochastically varying size.

Masaru Iizuka1.   

Abstract

For a Wright-Fisher model with mutation whose population size fluctuates stochastically from generation to generation, a heterozygosity effective population size is defined by means of the equilibrium average heterozygosity of the population. It is shown that this effective population size is equal to the harmonic mean of population size if and only if the stochastic changes of population size are uncorrelated. The effective population size is larger (resp. smaller) than the harmonic mean when the stochastic changes of population size are positively (resp. negatively) autocorrelated. These results and those obtained so far for other stochastic models with fluctuating population size suggest that the property that effective population sizes are always larger than the harmonic mean under the fluctuation of population size holds only for continuous time models such as diffusion and coalescent models, whereas effective population sizes can be equal to or smaller than the harmonic mean for discrete time models.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19885658     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-009-0304-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  14 in total

1.  The neutral theory in an infinite population.

Authors:  J H Gillespie
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2000-12-30       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  DNA evolution under weak selection.

Authors:  H Tachida
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2000-12-30       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Coalescent process with fluctuating population size and its effective size.

Authors:  Akinori Sano; Akinobu Shimizu; Masaru Iizuka
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  On the meaning and existence of an effective population size.

Authors:  P Sjödin; I Kaj; S Krone; M Lascoux; M Nordborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Bottleneck effect on evolutionary rate in the nearly neutral mutation model.

Authors:  H Araki; H Tachida
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT AND GENETIC VARIABILITY IN POPULATIONS.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nei; Takeo Maruyama; Ranajit Chakraborty
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  A note on the balance between random sampling and population size. (On the 30th anniversary of G. Malécot's paper).

Authors:  E Seneta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution.

Authors:  T Ohta
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The inbreeding effective number and the effective number of alleles in a population that varies in size.

Authors:  A B Chia; E Pollak
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 1.570

10.  Evolutionary rate at the molecular level.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of demographic stochasticity and life-history strategies on times and probabilities to fixation.

Authors:  Diala Abu Awad; Camille Coron
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.821

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.