Literature DB >> 19885251

A review of current evidence with continuous glucose monitoring in patients with diabetes.

Christophe De Block1, Begoña Manuel-y-Keenoy, Luc Van Gaal.   

Abstract

Devices that measure glucose on a near-continuous basis may provide a better insight into glycemic profiles, allowing patients with diabetes to make therapeutic adjustments to improve metabolic control, thereby reducing the risk of diabetic complications. Motivated and technologically adept patients with brittle diabetes, hypoglycemia unawareness, diabetic pregnancy, or who use pumps might benefit.Current evidence of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on health outcome in patients with diabetes is critically reviewed. No data are available on chronic complications or mortality. Therefore, surrogate endpoints need to be investigated, particularly HbA1c, number of hypo- and hyperglycemic episodes, time within normal, high, or low glucose concentrations, glycemic variability, and quality of life.Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using CGM in a retrospective way did not show metabolic improvement. In contrast, most RCTs applying real-time CGM showed a decrease in HbA1c, reduced glycemic variability, and a diminished number and length of hypo- and hyperglycemic events. Using accurate, real-time CGM devices improves quality of life by reducing the fear of unexpected hypoglycemic events. These beneficial effects were observed despite the fact that in most studies no clear treatment algorithm based on CGM results was provided to the patients. However, most trials were too short in duration, with a variable use of CGM, and were performed in small study samples.In conclusion, real-time CGM systems can improve metabolic control, reduce hypoglycemic episodes, and improve quality of life. Whether this holds true for longer time periods and in the majority of patients remains to be proven. In the long term, CGM might help to reduce chronic diabetes complications and perhaps also mortality, thereby reducing health care costs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  continuous glucose monitoring; diabetes; metabolic control

Year:  2008        PMID: 19885251      PMCID: PMC2769750          DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  53 in total

1.  Continuous glucose monitoring used to adjust diabetes therapy improves glycosylated hemoglobin: a pilot study.

Authors:  B W Bode; T M Gross; K R Thornton; J J Mastrototaro
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.602

2.  A randomized multicenter trial comparing the GlucoWatch Biographer with standard glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  H Peter Chase; Roy Beck; William Tamborlane; Bruce Buckingham; Nelly Mauras; Eva Tsalikian; Tim Wysocki; Stuart Weinzimer; Craig Kollman; Katrina Ruedy; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 3.  Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Poor patient adherence may undermine aim of continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Mike Mitka
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Reduction in hemoglobin A1C with real-time continuous glucose monitoring: results from a 12-week observational study.

Authors:  Timothy S Bailey; Howard C Zisser; Satish K Garg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  H P Chase; L M Kim; S L Owen; T A MacKenzie; G J Klingensmith; R Murtfeldt; S K Garg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Is the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose related to long-term metabolic control? Multicenter analysis including 24,500 patients from 191 centers in Germany and Austria.

Authors:  M Schütt; W Kern; U Krause; P Busch; A Dapp; R Grziwotz; I Mayer; J Rosenbauer; C Wagner; A Zimmermann; W Kerner; R W Holl
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.949

8.  Continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Kirsimarja K Kestilä; Ulla U Ekblad; Tapani Rönnemaa
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 5.602

9.  The role of continuous glucose monitoring in clinical decision-making in diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Kylie McLachlan; Alicia Jenkins; David O'Neal
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.100

10.  Continuous glucose monitoring for treatment adjustment in diabetic pregnancies--a pilot study.

Authors:  Y Yogev; A Ben-Haroush; R Chen; B Kaplan; M Phillip; M Hod
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.359

View more
  10 in total

1.  Preventing hypoglycemia with novel technology and flexible therapy.

Authors:  Judit Dunai; Garry S Tobin
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr

2.  The use of continuous glucose monitoring in the practical management of glycogen storage disorders.

Authors:  Fiona J White; Simon A Jones
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 3.  Glucose monitoring during pregnancy.

Authors:  J Seth Hawkins
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Glucose control in the ICU: is there a time for more ambitious targets again?

Authors:  Martin Haluzik; Milos Mraz; Petr Kopecky; Michal Lips; Stepan Svacina
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-18

5.  The impact of continuous glucose monitoring on low interstitial glucose values and low blood glucose values assessed by point-of-care blood glucose meters: results of a crossover trial.

Authors:  Norbert Hermanns; Beatrix Schumann; Bernhard Kulzer; Thomas Haak
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-02-21

6.  Fabrication of a Flexible Amperometric Glucose Sensor Using Additive Processes.

Authors:  Xiaosong Du; Christopher J Durgan; David J Matthews; Joshua R Motley; Xuebin Tan; Kovit Pholsena; Líney Árnadóttir; Jessica R Castle; Peter G Jacobs; Robert S Cargill; W Kenneth Ward; John F Conley; Gregory S Herman
Journal:  ECS J Solid State Sci Technol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.070

7.  The Evolving Role of Short-Term Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control and Hypoglycemia Among Saudi Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Ayman A Al Hayek; Asirvatham A Robert; Mohammed Al Dawish; Rania A Ahmed; Fahad S Al Sabaan
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 2.945

8.  Glucose Fluctuations during Gestation: An Additional Tool for Monitoring Pregnancy Complicated by Diabetes.

Authors:  M G Dalfrà; N C Chilelli; G Di Cianni; G Mello; C Lencioni; S Biagioni; M Scalese; G Sartore; A Lapolla
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.257

9.  Effect of prandial treatment timing adjustment, based on continuous glucose monitoring, in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with once-daily basal insulin: A randomized, phase IV study.

Authors:  Jacob Ilany; Hamad Bhandari; Dan Nabriski; Yoel Toledano; Noa Konvalina; Ohad Cohen
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 6.577

10.  A non-enzymatic glucose sensor enabled by bioelectronic pH control.

Authors:  Xenofon Strakosas; John Selberg; Pattawong Pansodtee; Nebyu Yonas; Pattawut Manapongpun; Mircea Teodorescu; Marco Rolandi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.