Literature DB >> 19885176

Basal-prandial insulin delivery in type 2 diabetes mellitus via the V-Go: a novel continuous subcutaneous infusion device.

Christoph Kapitza1, Seymour Fein, Lutz Heinemann, Debra Schleusener, Steven Levesque, Poul Strange.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The V-Go is a once-daily disposable device that allows coverage of basal and prandial insulin requirements over a period of 24 hours. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to evaluate the clinical functionality, safety, and pharmacodynamics of the V-Go delivering insulin aspart and redistributing a single basal dose of insulin glargine as a constant basal infusion supplemented with prandial insulin in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
METHODS: In six subjects receiving once-daily subcutaneous (SC) injections of insulin glargine (> or =15 U/day) with or without concomitant oral antidiabetic drugs, glargine was discontinued following a 3-day baseline phase. The V-Go was then applied to the lower abdomen of the subjects once daily for 7 days (days 1-3 inpatient, days 4-7 outpatient). Each V-Go provided a continuous 24-hour preset basal infusion rate of insulin aspart (0.6 U/h) and up to three daily prandial doses at mealtimes. Capillary blood glucose concentrations were measured at 11 time points per day during the baseline and inpatient phases and at 4 time points per day during the outpatient phase. Additionally, glucose profiles were measured continuously on all days.
RESULTS: The V-Go was well tolerated and operated as anticipated. The mean +/- SEM prestudy daily dose of SC insulin glargine was 33.3 +/- 13.8 U; the mean daily total insulin aspart dose infused with the V-Go was 31.5 +/- 7.5 and 32.3 +/- 7.8 U for the inpatient and outpatient periods, respectively. Fasting blood glucose values were similar to those observed at baseline throughout the study, with nonsignificant (NS) reductions in readings collected during the outpatient phase before lunch (-35 +/- 27 mg/dl) and before dinner (-38 +/- 25 mg/dl). The 2-hour postprandial glucose trended lower from 231 to 195 mg/dl (NS) at breakfast, 234 to 166 mg/dl (NS) at lunch, and 222 to 171 mg/dl (NS) at dinner. Bedtime blood glucose decreased (mean change from baseline -52 +/- 21 mg/dl; P = 0.0313), as did nighttime (3:00 AM) measurements (-20 +/- 9 mg/dl; P = 0.0313). Overall glycemic control tended to improve, as shown by continuous glucose monitoring changing from 173 to 157 mg/dl (P = 0.063, NS) and 156 mg/dl (P = 0.219) during inpatient and outpatient periods, respectively. Glycemic variability assessed by the M value similarly tended to decrease from 33 +/- 9 to 25 +/- 4 (NS) and 21 +/- 4 (NS) for inpatient and outpatient periods, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These first data suggest that use of the V-Go is an attractive alternative to SC insulin injection therapy because metabolic control appears to be maintained or even improved without increasing daily insulin doses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  V-Go; basal–prandial insulin; continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; glycemic control; h-Patch; type 2 diabetes

Year:  2008        PMID: 19885176      PMCID: PMC2769698          DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  9 in total

1.  THE M-VALVE, AN INDEX OF BLOOD-SUGAR CONTROL IN DIABETICS.

Authors:  J SCHLICHTKRULL; O MUNCK; M JERSILD
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1965-01

2.  Impact of active versus usual algorithmic titration of basal insulin and point-of-care versus laboratory measurement of HbA1c on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Glycemic Optimization with Algorithms and Labs at Point of Care (GOAL A1C) trial.

Authors:  Laurence Kennedy; William H Herman; Poul Strange; Anthony Harris
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Slicing the pie. Correlating HbA--values with average blood glucose values in a pie chart form.

Authors:  K W Brewer; H P Chase; S Owen; S K Garg
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  A 26-week, randomized, parallel, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin as add-on therapy to oral glucose-lowering drugs in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Kjeld Hermansen; Melanie Davies; Taudeusz Derezinski; Gabrielle Martinez Ravn; Per Clauson; Philip Home
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Contributions of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose increments to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetic patients: variations with increasing levels of HbA(1c).

Authors:  Louis Monnier; Hélène Lapinski; Claude Colette
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Development and validation of a new measure to evaluate psychological resistance to insulin treatment.

Authors:  Frank Petrak; Elmar Stridde; Friedhelm Leverkus; Alexander A Crispin; Thomas Forst; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Treat-to-target insulin titration algorithms when initiating long or intermediate acting insulin in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Poul Strange
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-07

8.  Implementation of treatment protocols in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Matthew C Riddle; Julio Rosenstock; John Gerich
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 19.112

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  V-Go Insulin Delivery System Versus Multiple Daily Insulin Injections for Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Abigail Winter; Michaela Lintner; Emily Knezevich
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-21

2.  Where to Go Now With V-Go?

Authors:  Bithika M Thompson; Curtiss B Cook
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-15

3.  Insulin pump use in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Bruce W Bode
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes With the V-Go Wearable Insulin Delivery Device in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Lisa T Meade; Dawn Battise
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2021-07

5.  A Pragmatic Clinical Trial to Compare the Real-World Effectiveness of V-Go versus Standard Delivery of Insulin in Patients with Advanced Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Mark J Cziraky; Scott Abbott; Matt Nguyen; Kay Larholt; Elizabeth Apgar; Thomas Wasser; Poul Strange; Leon Shi; H Courtenay Harrison; Beverly Everitt; Lynn Nowak
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2019-03-27

6.  Patch-pump technology to manage type 2 diabetes mellitus: hurdles to market acceptance.

Authors:  Matthew J Skladany; Michaela Miller; Joshua S Guthermann; Christopher R Ludwig
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

7.  Aspects of insulin treatment.

Authors:  Zachary T Bloomgarden
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Using observational data to inform the design of a prospective effectiveness study for a novel insulin delivery device.

Authors:  Michael Grabner; Yong Chen; Matthew Nguyen; Scott D Abbott; Ralph Quimbo
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-09-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.