PURPOSE: For the majority of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), CNS prophylaxis consists of eitherintrathecal (IT) methotrexate or triple IT therapy (ie, methotrexate with both cytarabine and hydrocortisone). The long-term neurotoxicities of these two IT strategies have not yet been directly compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multisite study, 171 children with standard-risk ALL, age 1 to 9.99 years at diagnosis, previously randomly assigned to IT methotrexate (n = 82) or to triple IT therapy (n = 89) on CCG 1952, underwent neurocognitive evaluation by a licensed psychologist at a mean of 5.9 years after random assignment. RESULTS: Patients who received IT methotrexate had a mean Processing Speed Index that was 3.6 points lower, about one fourth of a standard deviation, than those who received triple IT therapy (P = .04) after analysis was adjusted for age, sex, and time since diagnosis. Likewise, 19.5% of children in the IT methotrexate group had a Processing Speed Index score in the below-average range compared with 6.9% in the triple IT therapy group (P = .02). Otherwise, the groups performed similarly on tests of full-scale intelligence quotient, academic achievement, attention/concentration, memory, and visual motor integration. The association of treatment with measures of cognitive functioning was not modified by sex or age at diagnosis. In the post-therapy period, there were no group differences in special education services, neurologic events, or use of psychotropic medications. CONCLUSION: This study did not show any clinically meaningful differences in neurocognitive functioning between patients previously randomly assigned to IT methotrexate or triple IT therapy except for a small difference in processing speed in the IT methotrexate group.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: For the majority of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), CNS prophylaxis consists of either intrathecal (IT) methotrexate or triple IT therapy (ie, methotrexate with both cytarabine and hydrocortisone). The long-term neurotoxicities of these two IT strategies have not yet been directly compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multisite study, 171 children with standard-risk ALL, age 1 to 9.99 years at diagnosis, previously randomly assigned to IT methotrexate (n = 82) or to triple IT therapy (n = 89) on CCG 1952, underwent neurocognitive evaluation by a licensed psychologist at a mean of 5.9 years after random assignment. RESULTS:Patients who received IT methotrexate had a mean Processing Speed Index that was 3.6 points lower, about one fourth of a standard deviation, than those who received triple IT therapy (P = .04) after analysis was adjusted for age, sex, and time since diagnosis. Likewise, 19.5% of children in the IT methotrexate group had a Processing Speed Index score in the below-average range compared with 6.9% in the triple IT therapy group (P = .02). Otherwise, the groups performed similarly on tests of full-scale intelligence quotient, academic achievement, attention/concentration, memory, and visual motor integration. The association of treatment with measures of cognitive functioning was not modified by sex or age at diagnosis. In the post-therapy period, there were no group differences in special education services, neurologic events, or use of psychotropic medications. CONCLUSION: This study did not show any clinically meaningful differences in neurocognitive functioning between patients previously randomly assigned to IT methotrexate or triple IT therapy except for a small difference in processing speed in the IT methotrexate group.
Authors: Laura Iuvone; Paolo Mariotti; Cesare Colosimo; Francesco Guzzetta; Antonio Ruggiero; Riccardo Riccardi Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Annemieke I Buizer; Leo M J de Sonneville; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Anjo J P Veerman Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Maarten Mennes; Peter Stiers; Erik Vandenbussche; Gertrui Vercruysse; Anne Uyttebroeck; Geert De Meyer; Stefaan W Van Cool Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: W A Bleyer; P F Coccia; H N Sather; C Level; J Lukens; D J Niebrugge; S Siegel; P S Littman; S L Leikin; D R Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1983-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Smith; D Arthur; B Camitta; A J Carroll; W Crist; P Gaynon; R Gelber; N Heerema; E L Korn; M Link; S Murphy; C H Pui; J Pullen; G Reamon; S E Sallan; H Sather; J Shuster; R Simon; M Trigg; D Tubergen; F Uckun; R Ungerleider Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D G Tubergen; G S Gilchrist; R T O'Brien; P F Coccia; H N Sather; M J Waskerwitz; G D Hammond Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ida M Moore; Marilyn J Hockenberry; Cynthia Anhalt; Kathy McCarthy; Kevin R Krull Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Marc H Bornstein; Sara Scrimin; Diane L Putnick; Fabia Capello; O Maurice Haynes; Simona de Falco; Modesto Carli; Marta Pillon Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2012-02-02
Authors: Susan J Lindemulder; Linda C Stork; Bruce Bostrom; Xiaomin Lu; Meenakshi Devidas; Stephen Hunger; Joseph P Neglia; Nina S Kadan-Lottick Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Kevin R Krull; Raja B Khan; Kirsten K Ness; Davonna Ledet; Liang Zhu; Ching-Hon Pui; Scott C Howard; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Noah D Sabin; Melissa M Hudson; E Brannon Morris Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Yin Ting Cheung; Tara M Brinkman; Chenghong Li; Yasmin Mzayek; Deokumar Srivastava; Kirsten K Ness; Sunita K Patel; Rebecca M Howell; Kevin C Oeffinger; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin R Krull Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Kevin R Krull; Deepa Bhojwani; Heather M Conklin; Deqing Pei; Cheng Cheng; Wilburn E Reddick; John T Sandlund; Ching-Hon Pui Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lillian Sung; Theo Zaoutis; Nicole J Ullrich; Donna Johnston; Lee Dupuis; Elena Ladas Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 3.167