PURPOSE: Survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at increased risk for neurocognitive problems, with significant interindividual variability in outcome. This study examined genetic polymorphisms associated with variability in neurocognitive outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Neurocognitive outcomes were evaluated at the end of therapy in 243 survivors treated on an institutional protocol featuring risk-adapted chemotherapy without prophylactic cranial irradiation. Polymorphisms in genes related to pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of antileukemic agents, drug metabolism, oxidative stress, and attention problems in noncancer populations were examined as predictors of outcome, using multiple general linear models and controlling for age at diagnosis, sex, race, and treatment intensity. RESULTS: Compared with national norms, the cohort demonstrated significantly higher rates of problems on direct assessment of sustained attention (P = .01) and on parent ratings of attention problems (P = .02). Children with the A2756G polymorphism in methionine synthase (MS) were more likely to demonstrate deficits in attentiveness (P = .03) and response speed (P = .02), whereas those with various polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferase demonstrated increased performance variability (P = .01) and reduced attentiveness (P = .003). Polymorphisms in monoamine oxidase (T1460CA) were associated with increased attention variability (P = .03). Parent-reported attention problems were more common in children with the Cys112Arg polymorphism in apoliopoprotein E4 (P = .01). CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with our previous report of association between attention problems and MS in an independent cohort of long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only. The results also raise the possibility of an impact from genetic predispositions related to oxidative stress and CNS integrity.
PURPOSE: Survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at increased risk for neurocognitive problems, with significant interindividual variability in outcome. This study examined genetic polymorphisms associated with variability in neurocognitive outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Neurocognitive outcomes were evaluated at the end of therapy in 243 survivors treated on an institutional protocol featuring risk-adapted chemotherapy without prophylactic cranial irradiation. Polymorphisms in genes related to pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of antileukemic agents, drug metabolism, oxidative stress, and attention problems in noncancer populations were examined as predictors of outcome, using multiple general linear models and controlling for age at diagnosis, sex, race, and treatment intensity. RESULTS: Compared with national norms, the cohort demonstrated significantly higher rates of problems on direct assessment of sustained attention (P = .01) and on parent ratings of attention problems (P = .02). Children with the A2756G polymorphism in methionine synthase (MS) were more likely to demonstrate deficits in attentiveness (P = .03) and response speed (P = .02), whereas those with various polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferase demonstrated increased performance variability (P = .01) and reduced attentiveness (P = .003). Polymorphisms in monoamine oxidase (T1460CA) were associated with increased attention variability (P = .03). Parent-reported attention problems were more common in children with the Cys112Arg polymorphism in apoliopoprotein E4 (P = .01). CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with our previous report of association between attention problems and MS in an independent cohort of long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only. The results also raise the possibility of an impact from genetic predispositions related to oxidative stress and CNS integrity.
Authors: Elisabeth F C van Rossum; Petronella H M Roks; Frank H de Jong; Albert O Brinkmann; Huib A P Pols; Jan W Koper; Steven W J Lamberts Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: O Cases; C Lebrand; B Giros; T Vitalis; E De Maeyer; M G Caron; D J Price; P Gaspar; I Seif Journal: J Neurosci Date: 1998-09-01 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Tim A Ahles; Andrew J Saykin; Walter W Noll; Charlotte T Furstenberg; Stephen Guerin; Bernard Cole; Leila A Mott Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Slim Fellah; Yin T Cheung; Matthew A Scoggins; Ping Zou; Noah D Sabin; Ching-Hon Pui; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Robert J Ogg; Kevin R Krull Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Joshua Luxton; Tara M Brinkman; Cara Kimberg; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin R Krull Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Deepa Bhojwani; Noah D Sabin; Deqing Pei; Jun J Yang; Raja B Khan; John C Panetta; Kevin R Krull; Hiroto Inaba; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Monika L Metzger; Scott C Howard; Raul C Ribeiro; Cheng Cheng; Wilburn E Reddick; Sima Jeha; John T Sandlund; William E Evans; Ching-Hon Pui; Mary V Relling Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 44.544