Literature DB >> 19881436

Case-based or non-case-based questions for teaching postgraduate physicians: a randomized crossover trial.

David A Cook1, Warren G Thompson, Kris G Thomas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The comparative efficacy of case-based (CB) and non-CB self-assessment questions in Web-based instruction is unknown. The authors sought to compare CB and non-CB questions.
METHOD: The authors conducted a randomized crossover trial in the continuity clinics of two academic residency programs. Four Web-based modules on ambulatory medicine were developed in both CB (periodic questions based on patient scenarios) and non-CB (questions matched for content but lacking patient scenarios) formats. Participants completed two modules in each format (sequence randomly assigned). Participants also completed a pretest of applied knowledge for two modules (randomly assigned).
RESULTS: For the 130 participating internal medicine and family medicine residents, knowledge scores improved significantly (P < .0001) from pretest (mean: 53.5; SE: 1.1) to posttest (75.1; SE: 0.7). Posttest knowledge scores were similar in CB (75.0; SE: 0.1) and non-CB formats (74.7; SE: 1.1); the 95% CI was -1.6, 2.2 (P = .76). A nearly significant (P = .062) interaction between format and the presence or absence of pretest suggested a differential effect of question format, depending on pretest. Overall, those taking pretests had higher posttest knowledge scores (76.7; SE: 1.1) than did those not taking pretests (73.0; SE: 1.1; 95% CI: 1.7, 5.6; P = .0003). Learners preferred the CB format. Time required was similar (CB: 42.5; SE: 1.8 minutes, non-CB: 40.9; SE: 1.8 minutes; P = .22).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, among postgraduate physicians, CB and non-CB questions have similar effects on knowledge scores, but learners prefer CB questions. Pretests influence posttest scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19881436     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b6b36e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  5 in total

1.  Nephrologists as Educators: Clarifying Roles, Seizing Opportunities.

Authors:  Kenar D Jhaveri; Mark A Perazella
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Impact of Curriculum Content on Resident Attitudes Towards Cancer Care.

Authors:  Thomas Lycan; Kristopher Hansen; David Miller
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Problem-based learning in continuing medical education: review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hilal Al-Azri; Savithiri Ratnapalan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  A Decade of Teaching and Learning in Internal Medicine Ambulatory Education: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Andrew Coyle; Ira Helenius; Christina M Cruz; E Allison Lyons; Natalie May; John Andrilli; M Merav Bannet; Rachel Pinotti; David C Thomas
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-04

5.  Comfort and experience with online learning: trends over nine years and associations with knowledge.

Authors:  David A Cook; Warren G Thompson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.