Terry Hassold1, Patricia Hunt. 1. School of Molecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, USA. terryhassold@wsu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The relationship between increasing maternal age and trisomy has been recognized for over 50 years and is one of the most important etiological factors associated with any human genetic disorder. Specifically, the risk of trisomy in a clinically recognized pregnancy rises from about 2-3% for women in their twenties to an astounding 30% or more for women in their forties. Thus, as women approach the end of their child-bearing years, errors of chromosome segregation represent the most important impediment to a successful pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the clinical importance of this relationship, we do not understand how age affects the likelihood of producing a normal egg. Errors that affect chromosome segregation could occur at several stages during the development of the oocyte: in the fetal ovary, either during the mitotic proliferation of oogonia or the early stages of meiosis; in the 'dictyate' oocyte, during the 10-50-year period of meiotic arrest; or during the final stages of oocyte growth and maturation, when meiosis resumes and the meiotic divisions take place. Recent evidence from studies of human oocytes and trisomic conceptions and from studies in model organisms implicates errors at each of these stages. SUMMARY: It seems likely that there are multiple causes of human age-related nondisjunction, complicating our efforts to understand - and, ultimately, to provide preventive measures for - errors associated with increasing maternal age.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The relationship between increasing maternal age and trisomy has been recognized for over 50 years and is one of the most important etiological factors associated with any humangenetic disorder. Specifically, the risk of trisomy in a clinically recognized pregnancy rises from about 2-3% for women in their twenties to an astounding 30% or more for women in their forties. Thus, as women approach the end of their child-bearing years, errors of chromosome segregation represent the most important impediment to a successful pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the clinical importance of this relationship, we do not understand how age affects the likelihood of producing a normal egg. Errors that affect chromosome segregation could occur at several stages during the development of the oocyte: in the fetal ovary, either during the mitotic proliferation of oogonia or the early stages of meiosis; in the 'dictyate' oocyte, during the 10-50-year period of meiotic arrest; or during the final stages of oocyte growth and maturation, when meiosis resumes and the meiotic divisions take place. Recent evidence from studies of human oocytes and trisomic conceptions and from studies in model organisms implicates errors at each of these stages. SUMMARY: It seems likely that there are multiple causes of human age-related nondisjunction, complicating our efforts to understand - and, ultimately, to provide preventive measures for - errors associated with increasing maternal age.
Authors: Augustine Kong; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Hreinn Stefansson; Gisli Masson; Agnar Helgason; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Gudrun M Jonsdottir; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Sverrir Sverrisson; Theodora Thorlacius; Aslaug Jonasdottir; Gudmundur A Hardarson; Stefan T Palsson; Michael L Frigge; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson Journal: Science Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Heather E Hall; Urvashi Surti; Lori Hoffner; Sofia Shirley; Eleanor Feingold; Terry Hassold Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Merete Bugge; Andrew Collins; Jens Michael Hertz; Hans Eiberg; Claes Lundsteen; Carsten A Brandt; Mads Bak; Claus Hansen; Celia D Delozier; James Lespinasse; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Johanne M D Hahnemann; Kirsten Rasmussen; Gert Bruun-Petersen; Laurence Duprez; Niels Tommerup; Michael B Petersen Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2007-06-21 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Maj A Hultén; Suketu D Patel; Magnus Westgren; Nikos Papadogiannakis; Anna Maria Jonsson; Jon Jonasson; Erik Iwarsson Journal: Mol Cytogenet Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 2.009
Authors: Nathan R Treff; Rebecca L Krisher; Xin Tao; Heather Garnsey; Chelsea Bohrer; Elena Silva; Jessica Landis; Deanne Taylor; Richard T Scott; Teresa K Woodruff; Francesca E Duncan Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 4.285
Authors: Anna A Pendina; Olga A Efimova; Olga G Chiryaeva; Andrei V Tikhonov; Lubov' I Petrova; Vera S Dudkina; Natalia A Sadik; Irina D Fedorova; Ilona A Galembo; Tatyana V Kuznetzova; Alexander M Gzgzyan; Vladislav S Baranov Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Mary Ellen Pavone; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron; Candace Tingen; Cristina Thomas; Jessina Thomas; M Patrick Lowe; Julian C Schink; Teresa K Woodruff Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 3.060