Literature DB >> 19881348

Maternal age and chromosomally abnormal pregnancies: what we know and what we wish we knew.

Terry Hassold1, Patricia Hunt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The relationship between increasing maternal age and trisomy has been recognized for over 50 years and is one of the most important etiological factors associated with any human genetic disorder. Specifically, the risk of trisomy in a clinically recognized pregnancy rises from about 2-3% for women in their twenties to an astounding 30% or more for women in their forties. Thus, as women approach the end of their child-bearing years, errors of chromosome segregation represent the most important impediment to a successful pregnancy. RECENT
FINDINGS: Despite the clinical importance of this relationship, we do not understand how age affects the likelihood of producing a normal egg. Errors that affect chromosome segregation could occur at several stages during the development of the oocyte: in the fetal ovary, either during the mitotic proliferation of oogonia or the early stages of meiosis; in the 'dictyate' oocyte, during the 10-50-year period of meiotic arrest; or during the final stages of oocyte growth and maturation, when meiosis resumes and the meiotic divisions take place. Recent evidence from studies of human oocytes and trisomic conceptions and from studies in model organisms implicates errors at each of these stages.
SUMMARY: It seems likely that there are multiple causes of human age-related nondisjunction, complicating our efforts to understand - and, ultimately, to provide preventive measures for - errors associated with increasing maternal age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19881348      PMCID: PMC2894811          DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328332c6ab

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr        ISSN: 1040-8703            Impact factor:   2.856


  42 in total

1.  Cytological studies of meiotic recombination in human males.

Authors:  T Hassold; L Judis; E R Chan; S Schwartz; A Seftel; A Lynn
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  Sequence variants in the RNF212 gene associate with genome-wide recombination rate.

Authors:  Augustine Kong; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Hreinn Stefansson; Gisli Masson; Agnar Helgason; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Gudrun M Jonsdottir; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Sverrir Sverrisson; Theodora Thorlacius; Aslaug Jonasdottir; Gudmundur A Hardarson; Stefan T Palsson; Michael L Frigge; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The origin of trisomy 22: evidence for acrocentric chromosome-specific patterns of nondisjunction.

Authors:  Heather E Hall; Urvashi Surti; Lori Hoffner; Sofia Shirley; Eleanor Feingold; Terry Hassold
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  SMC1beta-deficient female mice provide evidence that cohesins are a missing link in age-related nondisjunction.

Authors:  Craig A Hodges; Ekaterina Revenkova; Rolf Jessberger; Terry J Hassold; Patricia A Hunt
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-10-30       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Altered patterns of meiotic recombination in human fetal oocytes with asynapsis and/or synaptonemal complex fragmentation at pachytene.

Authors:  Charles Tease; Geraldine Hartshorne; Maj Hultén
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  Inadequate histone deacetylation during oocyte meiosis causes aneuploidy and embryo death in mice.

Authors:  Tomohiko Akiyama; Masao Nagata; Fugaku Aoki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Age-associated increase in aneuploidy and changes in gene expression in mouse eggs.

Authors:  Hua Pan; Pengpeng Ma; Wenting Zhu; Richard M Schultz
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 8.  Spindle formation, chromosome segregation and the spindle checkpoint in mammalian oocytes and susceptibility to meiotic error.

Authors:  E Vogt; M Kirsch-Volders; J Parry; U Eichenlaub-Ritter
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Non-disjunction of chromosome 13.

Authors:  Merete Bugge; Andrew Collins; Jens Michael Hertz; Hans Eiberg; Claes Lundsteen; Carsten A Brandt; Mads Bak; Claus Hansen; Celia D Delozier; James Lespinasse; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Johanne M D Hahnemann; Kirsten Rasmussen; Gert Bruun-Petersen; Laurence Duprez; Niels Tommerup; Michael B Petersen
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  New insights into human nondisjunction of chromosome 21 in oocytes.

Authors:  Tiffany Renee Oliver; Eleanor Feingold; Kai Yu; Vivian Cheung; Stuart Tinker; Maneesha Yadav-Shah; Nirupama Masse; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  77 in total

1.  Polar body morphology is not predictive of its cell division origin.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott; Jing Su; Jessyca Campos; John Stevens; William Schoolcraft; Mandy Katz-Jaffe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Spindle assembly checkpoint signalling is uncoupled from chromosomal position in mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Liming Gui; Hayden Homer
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Mathematical modeling of human oocyte aneuploidy.

Authors:  Katarzyna M Tyc; Rajiv C McCoy; Karen Schindler; Jinchuan Xing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  On the paternal origin of trisomy 21 Down syndrome.

Authors:  Maj A Hultén; Suketu D Patel; Magnus Westgren; Nikos Papadogiannakis; Anna Maria Jonsson; Jon Jonasson; Erik Iwarsson
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Multiple meiotic errors caused by predivision of chromatids in women of advanced maternal age undergoing in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  Alan H Handyside; Markus Montag; M Cristina Magli; Sjoerd Repping; Joyce Harper; Andreas Schmutzler; Katerina Vesela; Luca Gianaroli; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Oocyte-specific differences in cell-cycle control create an innate susceptibility to meiotic errors.

Authors:  So Iha Nagaoka; Craig A Hodges; David F Albertini; Patricia Ann Hunt
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Mouse oocyte, a paradigm of cancer cell.

Authors:  Marie-Emilie Terret; Agathe Chaigne; Marie-Hélène Verlhac
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Next Generation Sequencing-Based Comprehensive Chromosome Screening in Mouse Polar Bodies, Oocytes, and Embryos.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Rebecca L Krisher; Xin Tao; Heather Garnsey; Chelsea Bohrer; Elena Silva; Jessica Landis; Deanne Taylor; Richard T Scott; Teresa K Woodruff; Francesca E Duncan
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  A comparative cytogenetic study of miscarriages after IVF and natural conception in women aged under and over 35 years.

Authors:  Anna A Pendina; Olga A Efimova; Olga G Chiryaeva; Andrei V Tikhonov; Lubov' I Petrova; Vera S Dudkina; Natalia A Sadik; Irina D Fedorova; Ilona A Galembo; Tatyana V Kuznetzova; Alexander M Gzgzyan; Vladislav S Baranov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Human ovarian tissue cortex surrounding benign and malignant lesions.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Pavone; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron; Candace Tingen; Cristina Thomas; Jessina Thomas; M Patrick Lowe; Julian C Schink; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.