Literature DB >> 19879039

A new multimodality technique accurately maps the primary lymphatic landing sites of the bladder.

Beat Roth1, Michael P Wissmeyer, Pascal Zehnder, Frédéric D Birkhäuser, George N Thalmann, Thomas M Krause, Urs E Studer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pathoanatomic studies have failed to map accurately the primary lymphatic landing sites of the urinary bladder.
OBJECTIVE: To use single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) combined with computed tomography (CT) plus intraoperative gamma probe verification to map the primary lymphatic landing sites of the bladder. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Clinical trial of 60 consecutive cystectomy patients at a single centre. INTERVENTION: Flexible cystoscopy-guided injection of technetium nanocolloid into one of six non-tumour-bearing sites of the bladder for preoperative detection of radioactive lymph nodes (LNs) with SPECT/CT followed by intraoperative verification with a gamma probe. Backup extended pelvic LN dissection (PLND) for ex vivo detection of missed LNs. MEASUREMENTS: Three-dimensional projection of each LN site. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A median of 4 (range: 1-14) radioactive LNs were detected per site and patient. Ninety-two percent of all LNs were found distal and caudal to where the ureter crosses the common iliac arteries. Eight percent were found proximal to the uretero-iliac crossing, none without simultaneous detection of additional radioactive LNs within the endopelvic region. Extended PLND resected 92% of all primary lymphatic landing sites; limited PLND resected only 52%. A few LNs may have been missed despite preoperative SPECT/CT, intraoperative gamma probe verification, and extended backup PLND.
CONCLUSIONS: Multimodality SPECT/CT plus intraoperative gamma probe show the template of the bladder's primary lymphatic landing sites to be larger than is often thought. PLND limited to the ventral portion of the external iliac vessels and obturator fossa removes only about 50% of all primary lymphatic landing sites, whereas extended PLND along the major pelvic vessels, including the internal iliac, external iliac, obturator, and common iliac region up to the uretero-iliac crossing, removes about 90%. Copyright 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19879039     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  35 in total

Review 1.  [Urothelial carcinoma].

Authors:  H Rübben; F Vom Dorp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Optimizing outcome reporting after radical cystectomy for organ-confined urothelial carcinoma of the bladder using oncological trifecta and pentafecta.

Authors:  Atiqullah Aziz; Michael Gierth; Michael Rink; Marianne Schmid; Felix K Chun; Roland Dahlem; Florian Roghmann; Rein-Jüri Palisaar; Joachim Noldus; Jörg Ellinger; Stefan C Müller; Armin Pycha; Thomas Martini; Christian Bolenz; Rudolf Moritz; Edwin Herrmann; Bastian Keck; Bernd Wullich; Roman Mayr; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Maximilian Burger; Patrick J Bastian; Christian Seitz; Sabine Brookman-May; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh F Shariat; Margit Fisch; Matthias May
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: is bigger better?

Authors:  Debasish Sundi; Robert S Svatek; Matthew E Nielsen; Mark P Schoenberg; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2014

Review 4.  Update on use of enhanced imaging to optimize lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for urothelial cancer of the bladder.

Authors:  Lukas Lusuardi; Günter Janetschek
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Lymph node-positive bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy: effect of the level of node positivity.

Authors:  Tatum V Tarin; Nicholas E Power; Behfar Ehdaie; John P Sfakianos; Jonathan L Silberstein; Caroline J Savage; Daniel Sjoberg; Guido Dalbagni; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  [Lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer: current status and controversies].

Authors:  T Metzger; G N Thalmann; P Zehnder
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  [The significance of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer].

Authors:  M Autenrieth; M Retz; J E Gschwend
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Optimization of sentinel lymph node mapping in bladder cancer using near-infrared fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  B E Schaafsma; F P R Verbeek; H W Elzevier; Q R J G Tummers; J R van der Vorst; J V Frangioni; C J H van de Velde; R C M Pelger; A L Vahrmeijer
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 9.  Lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer treatment: considerations on relevance and extent.

Authors:  Lars Weisbach; Roland Dahlem; Giuseppe Simone; Jens Hansen; Armin Soave; Oliver Engel; Felix K Chun; Shahrokh F Shariat; Margit Fisch; Michael Rink
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Differences in histopathological evaluation of standard lymph node dissections result in differences in nodal count but not in survival.

Authors:  L S Mertens; R P Meijer; E van Werkhoven; A Bex; H G van der Poel; B W van Rhijn; W Meinhardt; S Horenblas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.