Literature DB >> 19878728

The costs of monitoring simultaneously two sensory modalities decrease when dividing attention in space.

Valerio Santangelo1, Sabrina Fagioli, Emiliano Macaluso.   

Abstract

Traditional views of multisensory integration emphasise the advantage of stimulating or attending to different senses at one single spatial location. We challenge this view demonstrating that in-parallel processing of two sensory modalities can be more efficient when attention is spatially divided rather than focused. We asked subjects to monitor simultaneously vision and audition either at one location (focused attention) or in the two opposite hemifields (divided attention) or to monitor one single modality at one or two locations. Behavioural results demonstrated that the costs of monitoring two modalities, versus one modality, decrease when spatial attention is divided between two separate locations compared with focused attention. Neuroimaging data revealed increased activity in the posterior-parietal cortex (PPC) when monitoring two modalities at different locations, while no specific region was recruited in the focused attention conditions. We suggest that supramodal control and the integration of spatial representations hinders the selection of independent sensory streams when attention is spatially focused, while a greater exploitation of modality-specific resources and the engagement of PPC allows in-parallel processing when attention is spatially divided. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19878728     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  17 in total

1.  The contribution of working memory to divided attention.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Cross-modal decoupling in temporal attention between audition and touch.

Authors:  Stefanie Mühlberg; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-17

3.  Oscillatory alpha-band mechanisms and the deployment of spatial attention to anticipated auditory and visual target locations: supramodal or sensory-specific control mechanisms?

Authors:  Snigdha Banerjee; Adam C Snyder; Sophie Molholm; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Assessing the audiotactile Colavita effect in near and rear space.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Jess Hartcher O'Brien; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Jinglong Wu; Yong Shen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Vision and audition do not share attentional resources in sustained tasks.

Authors:  Roberto Arrighi; Roy Lunardi; David Burr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-05

7.  Activation of Right Ventral Prefrontal Cortex Using a Predictive Cue during Visual Spatial Orienting of Attentional Processes: An fMRI Study.

Authors:  Chunlin Li; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  Neurol Res Int       Date:  2012-05-07

8.  Large-Scale Brain Networks Supporting Divided Attention across Spatial Locations and Sensory Modalities.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-27

9.  Audio-visual interactions for motion perception in depth modulate activity in visual area V3A.

Authors:  Akitoshi Ogawa; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Task-related suppression of the brainstem frequency following response.

Authors:  W David Hairston; Tomasz R Letowski; Kaleb McDowell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.