Literature DB >> 19877245

Management of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer without prophylactic feeding tubes: the University of Pittsburgh experience.

Brian T McLaughlin1, Abhay S Gokhale, Yongli Shuai, Joyce Diacopoulos, Ricardo Carrau, Dwight E Heron, Ryan P Smith, Michael K Gibson, Robert L Ferris, Jennifer R Grandis, Jonas T Johnson, Athanassios Argiris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Mucositis and dysphagia are common complications of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for head and neck cancer that may necessitate nutritional support with a gastrostomy tube (G-tube).
METHODS: We reviewed records of patients who underwent and completed CRT, which included at least one traditional chemotherapeutic, for previously untreated head and neck cancer. G-tubes were placed as needed. The timing and duration of G-tube placement and treatment-related complications and risk factors for long-term G-tube use were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 91 consecutive patients who received CRT, 68 as primary and 23 as postoperative treatment, were studied. Radiation doses ranged from 59.4 to 74 Gy (median, 70 Gy). Seventy-nine percent of patients received platinum-based therapy during CRT. Severe mucositis occurred in 40% of patients. Forty percent of patients required G-tube placement (15 prior to CRT and 21 during CRT). Median duration of G-tube use was 5.8 months. Two patients who had a G-tube placed during CRT developed a G-tube-related complication. At 6 and 12 months, 15 (18%) and four (6%) patients who were disease free were using G-tubes, respectively. Patients with G-tubes placed prior to CRT or advanced T stage had longer G-tube dependence.
CONCLUSIONS: With aggressive supportive care it is feasible to avoid G-tubes in the majority of patients undergoing CRT for head and neck cancer. G-tube placement prior to CRT due to pre-existing dysphagia and advanced T stage are associated with prolonged G-tube dependence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19877245     DOI: 10.1002/lary.20697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  13 in total

1.  Induction docetaxel, cisplatin, and cetuximab followed by concurrent radiotherapy, cisplatin, and cetuximab and maintenance cetuximab in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Athanassios Argiris; Dwight E Heron; Ryan P Smith; Seungwon Kim; Michael K Gibson; Stephen Y Lai; Barton F Branstetter; Donna M Posluszny; Lin Wang; Raja R Seethala; Sanja Dacic; William Gooding; Jennifer R Grandis; Jonas T Johnson; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The impact of early percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement on treatment completeness and nutritional status in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Beste M Atasoy; Oya Yonal; Birsen Demirel; Faysal Dane; Yusuf Yilmaz; Cem Kalayci; Ufuk Abacioglu; Nese Imeryuz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Safety and long-term outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Richard E Burney; Benjamin S Bryner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Does PEG use cause dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients?

Authors:  Susan Langmore; Gintas P Krisciunas; Keri Vasquez Miloro; Steven R Evans; Debbie M Cheng
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Feeding Tube Utilization in Patients with Salivary Gland Malignancies.

Authors:  Diane Wenhua Chen; Jan S Lewin; Li Xu; Stephen Y Lai; G Brandon Gunn; Clifton David Fuller; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Aasheesh Kanwar; Erich M Sturgis; Katherine A Hutcheson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Patterns of prophylactic gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients: a consideration of the significance of social support and practice variation.

Authors:  Julie L Locher; James A Bonner; William R Carroll; Jimmy J Caudell; Jeroan J Allison; Meredith L Kilgore; Christine S Ritchie; Gabriel S Tajeu; Ya Yuan; David L Roth
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Pre-radiotherapy feeding tube identifies a poor prognostic subset of postoperative p16 positive oropharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Vivek Verma; Jingxia Liu; Laura Eschen; Jonathan Danieley; Christopher Spencer; James S Lewis; Jason Diaz; Jay F Piccirillo; Douglas R Adkins; Brian Nussenbaum; Wade L Thorstad; Hiram A Gay
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Age most significant predictor of requiring enteral feeding in head-and-neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Sean Sachdev; Tamer Refaat; Ian D Bacchus; Vythialinga Sathiaseelan; Bharat B Mittal
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Pain Prevention Using Head and Neck Cancer as a Model.

Authors:  Erin M McMenamin; Marcia Grant
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

10.  Long term results of postoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) located in the oropharynx or oral cavity.

Authors:  M Hoffmann; L Saleh-Ebrahimi; F Zwicker; P Haering; A Schwahofer; J Debus; P E Huber; F Roeder
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.