Literature DB >> 19876575

[Pica: epidemiology and association with pregnancy complications].

Cláudia Saunders1, Patricia de Carvalho Padilha, Beatriz Della Líbera, Jamile Lima Nogueira, Larissa Mello de Oliveira, Aurea Astulla.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: to verify the occurrence ratio of pica in pregnant women and its impact on the mother and newborn health.
METHODS: prospective study with 227 adult pregnant women and their newborns treated at the Maternity School of Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, between 2005 and 2006. Pica has been considered as the ingestion of inedible substances or atypical food combinations. The data was collected was done by medical chart review and interview.
RESULTS: Pica was referred to by 14.4% of the women, 42.1% of whom practiced it daily. The onset occurred in the second gestational trimester in 46.7% of the cases, and, in the third trimester, in 30% of them. Among the alleged reasons, 65% of the women were unable to give them, 15% declared relief of nausea and heartburn and 10% reported reduced stress and anxiety. The practice in the previous gestation/puerperium was referred to by 15% of the women. Pica was not associated with the maternal anthropometric condition, the skin color, the marital status, the maternal schooling and the presence of parasitosis. There was no difference between the average of the total family income and the number of gestations for the women who did or did not have pica. Pica was associated with gestational anemia (p<0.009) and gestational intercurrences (OR=3.5; CI95%=1.6-7.9). As for the baby, pica did not interfere in the health parameters at birth: weight, gestational age and intercurrences.
CONCLUSIONS: pica must be investigated at prenatal assistance and recognized as a risk factor for the mother's health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19876575     DOI: 10.1590/s0100-72032009000900004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet        ISSN: 0100-7203


  8 in total

1.  Pica and Eating Attitudes: A Study of High-Risk Pregnancies.

Authors:  Amanda M Santos; Gláucia R G Benute; Roseli M Y Nomura; Niraldo O Santos; Mara C S De Lucia; Rossana P V Francisco
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-03

2.  A meta-analysis of pica and micronutrient status.

Authors:  Diana Miao; Sera L Young; Christopher D Golden
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 1.937

Review 3.  Review of the nature of some geophagic materials and their potential health effects on pregnant women: some examples from Africa.

Authors:  Selma N Kambunga; Carla Candeias; Israel Hasheela; Hassina Mouri
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Prevalence and risk factors for pica during pregnancy in Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Neda Ezzeddin; Rosa Zavoshy; Mostafa Noroozi; Hassan Jahanihashemi; Shaghayegh Hadizadeh Riseh
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 4.652

5.  Geophagy among a Cohort of Kenyan Women with Mixed HIV Status: A Longitudinal Analysis.

Authors:  Joshua D Miller; Kaitlyn G Fitzgerald; Abigail L Smith; Sera L Young
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  A unique case of pica of adult onset with interesting psychosexual aspects.

Authors:  Suddhendu Chakraborty; D Sanyal; R Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2011-01

7.  Rapunzel syndrome: a rare postpartum case.

Authors:  Teshome Tegene; Yahia Foda; Omar Hussain; Kolawole Oloniyo; Ngoc-Tram Ha; Geeta Manikonda
Journal:  Case Rep Gastrointest Med       Date:  2013-09-19

8.  The Association Between Postpartum Depression and Pica During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Neda Ezzeddin; Roza Zavoshy; Mostafa Noroozi; Mohammad Ebrahim Sarichloo; Hassan Jahanihashemi
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-08-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.